Cargando…

Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of 550 mg naproxen sodium versus 6 mL 2%-lidocaine intracervical block in pain lowering at the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement in young women. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 women aged 15–24 years were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes, Baêta, Thaís, Brant, Ana Paula Caldeira, Silva-Filho, Agnaldo, Rocha, Ana Luiza Lunardi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34715839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z
_version_ 1784592262473187328
author de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes
Baêta, Thaís
Brant, Ana Paula Caldeira
Silva-Filho, Agnaldo
Rocha, Ana Luiza Lunardi
author_facet de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes
Baêta, Thaís
Brant, Ana Paula Caldeira
Silva-Filho, Agnaldo
Rocha, Ana Luiza Lunardi
author_sort de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of 550 mg naproxen sodium versus 6 mL 2%-lidocaine intracervical block in pain lowering at the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement in young women. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 women aged 15–24 years were block-randomized to receive either 6 mL 2%-lidocaine intracervical block 5 min before the LNG-IUS insertion or 550 mg naproxen 30 min before the procedure. Forty-nine women received 550 mg naproxen and 51 received intracervical block. The primary outcome was pain at LNG-IUS insertion. Secondary outcomes were ease of insertion, insertion failures, and correct IUS positioning. Neither participants nor doctors were blinded. Pain at insertion was assessed by using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Women randomized to lidocaine intracervical block presented lower mean pain score at insertion, when compared to women who received naproxen (5.4 vs. 7.3, respectively; p < 0.001). Parous women had a 90.1% lower chance of experiencing severe pain (p = 0.004). There was a 49.8% reduction in the chance of severe pain for every 1-cm increase in the hysterometry (p = 0.002). The only complication observed during insertion was vasovagal-like reactions (7%). The insertion was performed without difficulty in 82% of the women. Participants in the intracervical block group presented higher proportion of malpositioned IUS on transvaginal ultrasound examination compared to women in naproxen group. Nevertheless, all the malpositioned IUS were inserted by resident physicians. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine intracervical block was found to be more effective than naproxen in reducing LNG-IUS insertion pain. Trial registration number: RBR-68mmbp, Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, Retrospectively registered (August 4, 2020), URL of trial registry record: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-68mmbp/.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85568792021-11-01 Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes Baêta, Thaís Brant, Ana Paula Caldeira Silva-Filho, Agnaldo Rocha, Ana Luiza Lunardi BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of 550 mg naproxen sodium versus 6 mL 2%-lidocaine intracervical block in pain lowering at the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placement in young women. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 women aged 15–24 years were block-randomized to receive either 6 mL 2%-lidocaine intracervical block 5 min before the LNG-IUS insertion or 550 mg naproxen 30 min before the procedure. Forty-nine women received 550 mg naproxen and 51 received intracervical block. The primary outcome was pain at LNG-IUS insertion. Secondary outcomes were ease of insertion, insertion failures, and correct IUS positioning. Neither participants nor doctors were blinded. Pain at insertion was assessed by using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Women randomized to lidocaine intracervical block presented lower mean pain score at insertion, when compared to women who received naproxen (5.4 vs. 7.3, respectively; p < 0.001). Parous women had a 90.1% lower chance of experiencing severe pain (p = 0.004). There was a 49.8% reduction in the chance of severe pain for every 1-cm increase in the hysterometry (p = 0.002). The only complication observed during insertion was vasovagal-like reactions (7%). The insertion was performed without difficulty in 82% of the women. Participants in the intracervical block group presented higher proportion of malpositioned IUS on transvaginal ultrasound examination compared to women in naproxen group. Nevertheless, all the malpositioned IUS were inserted by resident physicians. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine intracervical block was found to be more effective than naproxen in reducing LNG-IUS insertion pain. Trial registration number: RBR-68mmbp, Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, Retrospectively registered (August 4, 2020), URL of trial registry record: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-68mmbp/. BioMed Central 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8556879/ /pubmed/34715839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
de Oliveira, Elaine Cristina Fontes
Baêta, Thaís
Brant, Ana Paula Caldeira
Silva-Filho, Agnaldo
Rocha, Ana Luiza Lunardi
Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34715839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiraelainecristinafontes useofnaproxenversusintracervicalblockforpaincontrolduringthe52mglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesysteminsertioninyoungwomenamultivariateanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baetathais useofnaproxenversusintracervicalblockforpaincontrolduringthe52mglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesysteminsertioninyoungwomenamultivariateanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brantanapaulacaldeira useofnaproxenversusintracervicalblockforpaincontrolduringthe52mglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesysteminsertioninyoungwomenamultivariateanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT silvafilhoagnaldo useofnaproxenversusintracervicalblockforpaincontrolduringthe52mglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesysteminsertioninyoungwomenamultivariateanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rochaanaluizalunardi useofnaproxenversusintracervicalblockforpaincontrolduringthe52mglevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesysteminsertioninyoungwomenamultivariateanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial