Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada

INTRODUCTION: While no direct comparative data exist for crizotinib in ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), studies have suggested clinical benefit with this targeted agent. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of crizotinib compared to standard platinum-doublet chem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beca, Jaclyn M., Walsh, Shaun, Raza, Kaiwan, Hubay, Stacey, Robinson, Andrew, Mow, Elena, Keech, James, Chan, Kelvin K. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34715804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z
_version_ 1784592266314121216
author Beca, Jaclyn M.
Walsh, Shaun
Raza, Kaiwan
Hubay, Stacey
Robinson, Andrew
Mow, Elena
Keech, James
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
author_facet Beca, Jaclyn M.
Walsh, Shaun
Raza, Kaiwan
Hubay, Stacey
Robinson, Andrew
Mow, Elena
Keech, James
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
author_sort Beca, Jaclyn M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While no direct comparative data exist for crizotinib in ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), studies have suggested clinical benefit with this targeted agent. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of crizotinib compared to standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ROS1+ advanced NSCLC. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with a 10-year time horizon from the perspective of the Canadian publicly-funded health care system. Health states included progression-free survival (PFS), up to two further lines of therapy post-progression, palliation and death. Given a lack of comparative data and small study samples, crizotinib or chemotherapy studies with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC patients were identified and time-to-event data from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves were collected to pool PFS data. Costs of drugs, treatment administration, monitoring, adverse events and palliative care were included in 2018 Canadian dollars, with 1.5% discounting. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated probabilistically using 5000 simulations. RESULTS: In the base-case probabilistic analysis, crizotinib produced additional 0.885 life-years and 0.772 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $238,077, producing an ICER of $273,286/QALY gained. No simulations were found to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY gained. A scenario analysis assuming efficacy equivalent to the ALK+ NSCLC population showed a slightly more favorable cost-effectiveness profile for crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Available data appear to support superior activity of crizotinib compared to chemotherapy in ROS1+ advanced NSCLC. At the list price, crizotinib was not cost-effective at commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85569022021-11-01 Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada Beca, Jaclyn M. Walsh, Shaun Raza, Kaiwan Hubay, Stacey Robinson, Andrew Mow, Elena Keech, James Chan, Kelvin K. W. BMC Cancer Research INTRODUCTION: While no direct comparative data exist for crizotinib in ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), studies have suggested clinical benefit with this targeted agent. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of crizotinib compared to standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ROS1+ advanced NSCLC. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with a 10-year time horizon from the perspective of the Canadian publicly-funded health care system. Health states included progression-free survival (PFS), up to two further lines of therapy post-progression, palliation and death. Given a lack of comparative data and small study samples, crizotinib or chemotherapy studies with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC patients were identified and time-to-event data from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves were collected to pool PFS data. Costs of drugs, treatment administration, monitoring, adverse events and palliative care were included in 2018 Canadian dollars, with 1.5% discounting. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated probabilistically using 5000 simulations. RESULTS: In the base-case probabilistic analysis, crizotinib produced additional 0.885 life-years and 0.772 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $238,077, producing an ICER of $273,286/QALY gained. No simulations were found to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY gained. A scenario analysis assuming efficacy equivalent to the ALK+ NSCLC population showed a slightly more favorable cost-effectiveness profile for crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Available data appear to support superior activity of crizotinib compared to chemotherapy in ROS1+ advanced NSCLC. At the list price, crizotinib was not cost-effective at commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z. BioMed Central 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8556902/ /pubmed/34715804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Beca, Jaclyn M.
Walsh, Shaun
Raza, Kaiwan
Hubay, Stacey
Robinson, Andrew
Mow, Elena
Keech, James
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ros1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) in canada
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34715804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z
work_keys_str_mv AT becajaclynm costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT walshshaun costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT razakaiwan costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT hubaystacey costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT robinsonandrew costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT mowelena costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT keechjames costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada
AT chankelvinkw costeffectivenessanalysisoffirstlinetreatmentwithcrizotinibinros1rearrangedadvancednonsmallcelllungcancernsclcincanada