Cargando…
Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues
Approaches for rapid reviews that focus on streamlining systematic review methods are not always suitable for exploring complex policy questions, as developing and testing theories to explain these complexities requires configuring diverse qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Our ob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y |
_version_ | 1784592266558439424 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Michael G. Oliver, Sandy Melendez-Torres, G. J. Lavis, John N. Waddell, Kerry Dickson, Kelly |
author_facet | Wilson, Michael G. Oliver, Sandy Melendez-Torres, G. J. Lavis, John N. Waddell, Kerry Dickson, Kelly |
author_sort | Wilson, Michael G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Approaches for rapid reviews that focus on streamlining systematic review methods are not always suitable for exploring complex policy questions, as developing and testing theories to explain these complexities requires configuring diverse qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Our objective was therefore to provide a guide to selecting approaches for rapidly (i.e., within days to months) addressing complex questions related to health policy and system issues. We provide a two-stage, transdisciplinary collaborative process to select a rapid review approach to address complex policy questions, which consists of scoping the breadth and depth of the literature and then selecting an optimal approach to synthesis. The first stage (scoping the literature) begins with a discussion with the stakeholders requesting evidence to identify and refine the question for the review, which is then used to conduct preliminary searches and conceptually map the documents identified. In the second stage (selection of an optimal approach), further stakeholder consultation is required to refine and tailor the question and approach to identifying relevant documents to include. The approach to synthesizing the included documents is then guided by the final question, the breadth and depth of the literature, and the time available and can include a static or evolving conceptual framework to code and analyze a range of evidence. For areas already covered extensively by existing systematic reviews, the focus can be on summarizing and integrating the review findings, resynthesizing the primary studies, or updating the search and reanalyzing one or more of the systematic reviews. The choice of approaches for conducting rapid reviews is intertwined with decisions about how to manage projects, the amount of work to be done, and the knowledge already available, and our guide offers support to help make these strategic decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8556903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85569032021-11-01 Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues Wilson, Michael G. Oliver, Sandy Melendez-Torres, G. J. Lavis, John N. Waddell, Kerry Dickson, Kelly Syst Rev Research Approaches for rapid reviews that focus on streamlining systematic review methods are not always suitable for exploring complex policy questions, as developing and testing theories to explain these complexities requires configuring diverse qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Our objective was therefore to provide a guide to selecting approaches for rapidly (i.e., within days to months) addressing complex questions related to health policy and system issues. We provide a two-stage, transdisciplinary collaborative process to select a rapid review approach to address complex policy questions, which consists of scoping the breadth and depth of the literature and then selecting an optimal approach to synthesis. The first stage (scoping the literature) begins with a discussion with the stakeholders requesting evidence to identify and refine the question for the review, which is then used to conduct preliminary searches and conceptually map the documents identified. In the second stage (selection of an optimal approach), further stakeholder consultation is required to refine and tailor the question and approach to identifying relevant documents to include. The approach to synthesizing the included documents is then guided by the final question, the breadth and depth of the literature, and the time available and can include a static or evolving conceptual framework to code and analyze a range of evidence. For areas already covered extensively by existing systematic reviews, the focus can be on summarizing and integrating the review findings, resynthesizing the primary studies, or updating the search and reanalyzing one or more of the systematic reviews. The choice of approaches for conducting rapid reviews is intertwined with decisions about how to manage projects, the amount of work to be done, and the knowledge already available, and our guide offers support to help make these strategic decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8556903/ /pubmed/34717777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wilson, Michael G. Oliver, Sandy Melendez-Torres, G. J. Lavis, John N. Waddell, Kerry Dickson, Kelly Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title | Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title_full | Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title_fullStr | Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title_short | Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
title_sort | paper 3: selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonmichaelg paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues AT oliversandy paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues AT melendeztorresgj paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues AT lavisjohnn paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues AT waddellkerry paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues AT dicksonkelly paper3selectingrapidreviewmethodsforcomplexquestionsrelatedtohealthpolicyandsystemissues |