Cargando…

Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya

BACKGROUND: We implemented a longitudinal study to determine the incidence of Brucella infection in cattle, camels, sheep and goats that were being raised in a pastoral area in Isiolo County, Kenya. An initial cross-sectional survey was implemented to identify unexposed animals for follow up; that s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Njeru, Josiah, Nthiwa, Daniel, Akoko, James, Oyas, Harry, Bett, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03036-z
_version_ 1784592275713556480
author Njeru, Josiah
Nthiwa, Daniel
Akoko, James
Oyas, Harry
Bett, Bernard
author_facet Njeru, Josiah
Nthiwa, Daniel
Akoko, James
Oyas, Harry
Bett, Bernard
author_sort Njeru, Josiah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We implemented a longitudinal study to determine the incidence of Brucella infection in cattle, camels, sheep and goats that were being raised in a pastoral area in Isiolo County, Kenya. An initial cross-sectional survey was implemented to identify unexposed animals for follow up; that survey used 141 camels, 216 cattle, 208 sheep and 161 goats. Sera from these animals were screened for Brucella spp. using the Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT), a modified RBPT, and an indirect multispecies Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (iELISA). Results of RBPT and iELISA were interpreted in parallel to determine seroprevalence. A total of 30 camels, 31 cattle, 22 sheep and 32 goats that were seronegative by all the above tests were recruited in a subsequent longitudinal study for follow up. These animals were followed for 12 months and tested for anti-Brucella antibodies using iELISA. Seroconversion among these animals was defined by a positive iELISA test following a negative iELISA result in the previous sampling period. All seropositive samples were further tested using real-time PCR-based assays to identify Brucella species. These analyses targeted the alkB and BMEI1162 genes for B. abortus, and B. melitensis, respectively. Data from the longitudinal study were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model that accounted for within-herds clustering of Brucella infections. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of Brucella infection was 0.024 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.014–0.037) cases per animal-months at risk. Brucella infection incidence in camels, cattle, goats and sheep were 0.053 (0.022–0.104), 0.028 (0.010–0.061), 0.013 (0.003–0.036) and 0.006 (0.0002–0.034) cases per animal-month at risk, respectively. The incidence rate of Brucella infection among females and males were 0.020 (0.009–0.036) and 0.016 (0.004–0.091), respectively. Real-time PCR analyses showed that B. abortus was more prevalent than B. melitensis in the area. Results of multivariable Cox regression analysis identified species (camels and cattle) as an important predictor of Brucella spp. exposure in animals. CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated an overall brucellosis incidence of 0.024 cases per animal-months at risk with camels and cattle having higher incidence than sheep and goats. These results will inform surveillance studies in the area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-021-03036-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85569482021-11-01 Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya Njeru, Josiah Nthiwa, Daniel Akoko, James Oyas, Harry Bett, Bernard BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: We implemented a longitudinal study to determine the incidence of Brucella infection in cattle, camels, sheep and goats that were being raised in a pastoral area in Isiolo County, Kenya. An initial cross-sectional survey was implemented to identify unexposed animals for follow up; that survey used 141 camels, 216 cattle, 208 sheep and 161 goats. Sera from these animals were screened for Brucella spp. using the Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT), a modified RBPT, and an indirect multispecies Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (iELISA). Results of RBPT and iELISA were interpreted in parallel to determine seroprevalence. A total of 30 camels, 31 cattle, 22 sheep and 32 goats that were seronegative by all the above tests were recruited in a subsequent longitudinal study for follow up. These animals were followed for 12 months and tested for anti-Brucella antibodies using iELISA. Seroconversion among these animals was defined by a positive iELISA test following a negative iELISA result in the previous sampling period. All seropositive samples were further tested using real-time PCR-based assays to identify Brucella species. These analyses targeted the alkB and BMEI1162 genes for B. abortus, and B. melitensis, respectively. Data from the longitudinal study were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model that accounted for within-herds clustering of Brucella infections. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of Brucella infection was 0.024 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.014–0.037) cases per animal-months at risk. Brucella infection incidence in camels, cattle, goats and sheep were 0.053 (0.022–0.104), 0.028 (0.010–0.061), 0.013 (0.003–0.036) and 0.006 (0.0002–0.034) cases per animal-month at risk, respectively. The incidence rate of Brucella infection among females and males were 0.020 (0.009–0.036) and 0.016 (0.004–0.091), respectively. Real-time PCR analyses showed that B. abortus was more prevalent than B. melitensis in the area. Results of multivariable Cox regression analysis identified species (camels and cattle) as an important predictor of Brucella spp. exposure in animals. CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated an overall brucellosis incidence of 0.024 cases per animal-months at risk with camels and cattle having higher incidence than sheep and goats. These results will inform surveillance studies in the area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-021-03036-z. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8556948/ /pubmed/34717610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03036-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Njeru, Josiah
Nthiwa, Daniel
Akoko, James
Oyas, Harry
Bett, Bernard
Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title_full Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title_fullStr Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title_short Incidence of Brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in Isiolo County, Kenya
title_sort incidence of brucella infection in various livestock species raised under the pastoral production system in isiolo county, kenya
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03036-z
work_keys_str_mv AT njerujosiah incidenceofbrucellainfectioninvariouslivestockspeciesraisedunderthepastoralproductionsysteminisiolocountykenya
AT nthiwadaniel incidenceofbrucellainfectioninvariouslivestockspeciesraisedunderthepastoralproductionsysteminisiolocountykenya
AT akokojames incidenceofbrucellainfectioninvariouslivestockspeciesraisedunderthepastoralproductionsysteminisiolocountykenya
AT oyasharry incidenceofbrucellainfectioninvariouslivestockspeciesraisedunderthepastoralproductionsysteminisiolocountykenya
AT bettbernard incidenceofbrucellainfectioninvariouslivestockspeciesraisedunderthepastoralproductionsysteminisiolocountykenya