Cargando…

Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers

This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eren, Birgul, Ozasir, Tufan, Kandemir, Baris, Gulsahi, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3818652
_version_ 1784592281990332416
author Eren, Birgul
Ozasir, Tufan
Kandemir, Baris
Gulsahi, Kamran
author_facet Eren, Birgul
Ozasir, Tufan
Kandemir, Baris
Gulsahi, Kamran
author_sort Eren, Birgul
collection PubMed
description This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n = 10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8556980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85569802021-10-31 Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers Eren, Birgul Ozasir, Tufan Kandemir, Baris Gulsahi, Kamran Biomed Res Int Research Article This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n = 10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2. Hindawi 2021-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8556980/ /pubmed/34725637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3818652 Text en Copyright © 2021 Birgul Eren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eren, Birgul
Ozasir, Tufan
Kandemir, Baris
Gulsahi, Kamran
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title_full Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title_fullStr Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title_short Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
title_sort comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fibersite postsystem and glass fiber, combined with different root canal sealers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3818652
work_keys_str_mv AT erenbirgul comparisonoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithfibersitepostsystemandglassfibercombinedwithdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT ozasirtufan comparisonoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithfibersitepostsystemandglassfibercombinedwithdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT kandemirbaris comparisonoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithfibersitepostsystemandglassfibercombinedwithdifferentrootcanalsealers
AT gulsahikamran comparisonoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithfibersitepostsystemandglassfibercombinedwithdifferentrootcanalsealers