Cargando…

Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance

BACKGROUND: In angiosperms, phenotypic variation of floral organs is often considered as the traditional basis for the evolutionary relationship of different taxonomic groups above the species level. However, little is known about that at or below the species level. Here, we experimentally tested th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ting, Ning, Kun, Zhang, Wangxiang, Chen, Hong, Lu, Xiaoqing, Zhang, Donglin, El-Kassaby, Yousry A., Bian, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03227-8
_version_ 1784592291774595072
author Zhou, Ting
Ning, Kun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Chen, Hong
Lu, Xiaoqing
Zhang, Donglin
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Bian, Jian
author_facet Zhou, Ting
Ning, Kun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Chen, Hong
Lu, Xiaoqing
Zhang, Donglin
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Bian, Jian
author_sort Zhou, Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In angiosperms, phenotypic variation of floral organs is often considered as the traditional basis for the evolutionary relationship of different taxonomic groups above the species level. However, little is known about that at or below the species level. Here, we experimentally tested the phenotypic variation of Malus floral organs using combined methods of intraspecific uniformity test, interspecific distinctness analysis, principal component analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and Q-type cluster analysis. The ancestor-inclined distribution characteristic analysis of Malus species and cultivars floral attributes was also carried out, so as to explore its taxonomic significance. RESULTS: 15/44 phenotypic traits (e.g., flower shape, flower type, flower diameter, ...) were highly consistent, distinguishable, and independent and could be used as the basis for Malus germplasm taxonomy. The studied 142 taxa were divided into two groups (A, B) and five sub-groups (A(1), A(2), B(1), B(2), B(3)), with significantly variable floral phenotypic attributes between groups and within sub-groups. Malus natural species were relatively clustered in the same section (series) while homologous cultivars showed evidence of ancestor-inclined distribution characteristics. However, no significant correlation between the evolutionary order of sections (Sect. Docyniopsis → Sect. Chloromeles → Sect. Sorbomalus → Sect. Eumalus) and group/sub-groups (B(3) → B(2) → B(1) → A). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic variation of floral organs could better explore the genetic relationship between Malus taxa. The findings improved our cognition of floral phenotypic variation taxonomic significance under the species level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85570242021-11-01 Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance Zhou, Ting Ning, Kun Zhang, Wangxiang Chen, Hong Lu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Donglin El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Bian, Jian BMC Plant Biol Research BACKGROUND: In angiosperms, phenotypic variation of floral organs is often considered as the traditional basis for the evolutionary relationship of different taxonomic groups above the species level. However, little is known about that at or below the species level. Here, we experimentally tested the phenotypic variation of Malus floral organs using combined methods of intraspecific uniformity test, interspecific distinctness analysis, principal component analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and Q-type cluster analysis. The ancestor-inclined distribution characteristic analysis of Malus species and cultivars floral attributes was also carried out, so as to explore its taxonomic significance. RESULTS: 15/44 phenotypic traits (e.g., flower shape, flower type, flower diameter, ...) were highly consistent, distinguishable, and independent and could be used as the basis for Malus germplasm taxonomy. The studied 142 taxa were divided into two groups (A, B) and five sub-groups (A(1), A(2), B(1), B(2), B(3)), with significantly variable floral phenotypic attributes between groups and within sub-groups. Malus natural species were relatively clustered in the same section (series) while homologous cultivars showed evidence of ancestor-inclined distribution characteristics. However, no significant correlation between the evolutionary order of sections (Sect. Docyniopsis → Sect. Chloromeles → Sect. Sorbomalus → Sect. Eumalus) and group/sub-groups (B(3) → B(2) → B(1) → A). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic variation of floral organs could better explore the genetic relationship between Malus taxa. The findings improved our cognition of floral phenotypic variation taxonomic significance under the species level. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8557024/ /pubmed/34717537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03227-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhou, Ting
Ning, Kun
Zhang, Wangxiang
Chen, Hong
Lu, Xiaoqing
Zhang, Donglin
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Bian, Jian
Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title_full Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title_fullStr Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title_short Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
title_sort phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03227-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouting phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT ningkun phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT zhangwangxiang phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT chenhong phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT luxiaoqing phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT zhangdonglin phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT elkassabyyousrya phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance
AT bianjian phenotypicvariationoffloralorgansinfloweringcrabapplesanditstaxonomicsignificance