Cargando…

Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment

BACKGROUND: The use of general practice electronic health records (EHRs) for research purposes is in its infancy in Australia. Given these data were collected for clinical purposes, questions remain around data quality and whether these data are suitable for use in prediction model development. In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thuraisingam, Sharmala, Chondros, Patty, Dowsey, Michelle M., Spelman, Tim, Garies, Stephanie, Choong, Peter F., Gunn, Jane, Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6
_version_ 1784592292521181184
author Thuraisingam, Sharmala
Chondros, Patty
Dowsey, Michelle M.
Spelman, Tim
Garies, Stephanie
Choong, Peter F.
Gunn, Jane
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
author_facet Thuraisingam, Sharmala
Chondros, Patty
Dowsey, Michelle M.
Spelman, Tim
Garies, Stephanie
Choong, Peter F.
Gunn, Jane
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
author_sort Thuraisingam, Sharmala
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of general practice electronic health records (EHRs) for research purposes is in its infancy in Australia. Given these data were collected for clinical purposes, questions remain around data quality and whether these data are suitable for use in prediction model development. In this study we assess the quality of data recorded in 201,462 patient EHRs from 483 Australian general practices to determine its usefulness in the development of a clinical prediction model for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Variables to be used in model development were assessed for completeness and plausibility. Accuracy for the outcome and competing risk were assessed through record level linkage with two gold standard national registries, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and National Death Index (NDI). The validity of the EHR data was tested using participant characteristics from the 2014–15 Australian National Health Survey (NHS). RESULTS: There were substantial missing data for body mass index and weight gain between early adulthood and middle age. TKR and death were recorded with good accuracy, however, year of TKR, year of death and side of TKR were poorly recorded. Patient characteristics recorded in the EHR were comparable to participant characteristics from the NHS, except for OA medication and metastatic solid tumour. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, data relating to the outcome, competing risk and two predictors were unfit for prediction model development. This study highlights the need for more accurate and complete recording of patient data within EHRs if these data are to be used to develop clinical prediction models. Data linkage with other gold standard data sets/registries may in the meantime help overcome some of the current data quality challenges in general practice EHRs when developing prediction models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85570282021-11-01 Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment Thuraisingam, Sharmala Chondros, Patty Dowsey, Michelle M. Spelman, Tim Garies, Stephanie Choong, Peter F. Gunn, Jane Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: The use of general practice electronic health records (EHRs) for research purposes is in its infancy in Australia. Given these data were collected for clinical purposes, questions remain around data quality and whether these data are suitable for use in prediction model development. In this study we assess the quality of data recorded in 201,462 patient EHRs from 483 Australian general practices to determine its usefulness in the development of a clinical prediction model for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Variables to be used in model development were assessed for completeness and plausibility. Accuracy for the outcome and competing risk were assessed through record level linkage with two gold standard national registries, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and National Death Index (NDI). The validity of the EHR data was tested using participant characteristics from the 2014–15 Australian National Health Survey (NHS). RESULTS: There were substantial missing data for body mass index and weight gain between early adulthood and middle age. TKR and death were recorded with good accuracy, however, year of TKR, year of death and side of TKR were poorly recorded. Patient characteristics recorded in the EHR were comparable to participant characteristics from the NHS, except for OA medication and metastatic solid tumour. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, data relating to the outcome, competing risk and two predictors were unfit for prediction model development. This study highlights the need for more accurate and complete recording of patient data within EHRs if these data are to be used to develop clinical prediction models. Data linkage with other gold standard data sets/registries may in the meantime help overcome some of the current data quality challenges in general practice EHRs when developing prediction models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8557028/ /pubmed/34717599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Thuraisingam, Sharmala
Chondros, Patty
Dowsey, Michelle M.
Spelman, Tim
Garies, Stephanie
Choong, Peter F.
Gunn, Jane
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title_full Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title_fullStr Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title_short Assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
title_sort assessing the suitability of general practice electronic health records for clinical prediction model development: a data quality assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01669-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thuraisingamsharmala assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT chondrospatty assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT dowseymichellem assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT spelmantim assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT gariesstephanie assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT choongpeterf assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT gunnjane assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment
AT manskinankervisjoanne assessingthesuitabilityofgeneralpracticeelectronichealthrecordsforclinicalpredictionmodeldevelopmentadataqualityassessment