Cargando…

Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems

BACKGROUND: Accurate QSPECT is crucial in dosimetry-based, personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy with (177)Lu and other radionuclides. We compared the quantitative performance of three NaI(Tl)-crystal SPECT/CT systems equipped with low-energy high-resolution collimators from two vendors (Siemens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desy, Alessandro, Bouvet, Guillaume F., Croteau, Étienne, Lafrenière, Nancy, Turcotte, Éric E., Després, Philippe, Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34718900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00421-3
_version_ 1784592332919668736
author Desy, Alessandro
Bouvet, Guillaume F.
Croteau, Étienne
Lafrenière, Nancy
Turcotte, Éric E.
Després, Philippe
Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
author_facet Desy, Alessandro
Bouvet, Guillaume F.
Croteau, Étienne
Lafrenière, Nancy
Turcotte, Éric E.
Després, Philippe
Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
author_sort Desy, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate QSPECT is crucial in dosimetry-based, personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy with (177)Lu and other radionuclides. We compared the quantitative performance of three NaI(Tl)-crystal SPECT/CT systems equipped with low-energy high-resolution collimators from two vendors (Siemens Symbia T6; GE Discovery 670 and NM/CT 870 DR). METHODS: Using up to 14 GBq of (99m)Tc in planar mode, we determined the calibration factor and dead-time constant under the assumption that these systems have a paralyzable behaviour. We monitored their response when one or both detectors were activated. QSPECT capability was validated by SPECT/CT imaging of a customized NEMA phantom containing up to 17 GBq of (99m)Tc. Acquisitions were reconstructed with a third-party ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm. RESULTS: The Siemens system had a higher calibration factor (100.0 cps/MBq) and a lower dead-time constant (0.49 μs) than those from GE (75.4–87.5 cps/MBq; 1.74 μs). Activities of up to 3.3 vs. 2.3–2.7 GBq, respectively, were quantifiable by QSPECT before the observed count rate plateaued or decreased. When used in single-detector mode, the QSPECT capability of the former system increased to 5.1 GBq, whereas that of the latter two systems remained independent of the detectors activation mode. CONCLUSION: Despite similar hardware, SPECT/CT systems’ response can significantly differ at high count rate, which impacts their QSPECT capability in a post-therapeutic setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00421-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85572322021-11-15 Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems Desy, Alessandro Bouvet, Guillaume F. Croteau, Étienne Lafrenière, Nancy Turcotte, Éric E. Després, Philippe Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu EJNMMI Phys Short Communication BACKGROUND: Accurate QSPECT is crucial in dosimetry-based, personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy with (177)Lu and other radionuclides. We compared the quantitative performance of three NaI(Tl)-crystal SPECT/CT systems equipped with low-energy high-resolution collimators from two vendors (Siemens Symbia T6; GE Discovery 670 and NM/CT 870 DR). METHODS: Using up to 14 GBq of (99m)Tc in planar mode, we determined the calibration factor and dead-time constant under the assumption that these systems have a paralyzable behaviour. We monitored their response when one or both detectors were activated. QSPECT capability was validated by SPECT/CT imaging of a customized NEMA phantom containing up to 17 GBq of (99m)Tc. Acquisitions were reconstructed with a third-party ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm. RESULTS: The Siemens system had a higher calibration factor (100.0 cps/MBq) and a lower dead-time constant (0.49 μs) than those from GE (75.4–87.5 cps/MBq; 1.74 μs). Activities of up to 3.3 vs. 2.3–2.7 GBq, respectively, were quantifiable by QSPECT before the observed count rate plateaued or decreased. When used in single-detector mode, the QSPECT capability of the former system increased to 5.1 GBq, whereas that of the latter two systems remained independent of the detectors activation mode. CONCLUSION: Despite similar hardware, SPECT/CT systems’ response can significantly differ at high count rate, which impacts their QSPECT capability in a post-therapeutic setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00421-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8557232/ /pubmed/34718900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00421-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Communication
Desy, Alessandro
Bouvet, Guillaume F.
Croteau, Étienne
Lafrenière, Nancy
Turcotte, Éric E.
Després, Philippe
Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title_full Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title_fullStr Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title_short Quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) at high count rates with contemporary SPECT/CT systems
title_sort quantitative spect (qspect) at high count rates with contemporary spect/ct systems
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34718900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00421-3
work_keys_str_mv AT desyalessandro quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT bouvetguillaumef quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT croteauetienne quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT lafrenierenancy quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT turcotteerice quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT despresphilippe quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems
AT beauregardjeanmathieu quantitativespectqspectathighcountrateswithcontemporaryspectctsystems