Cargando…

National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications

OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Surv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stead, Martine, Jessop, Curtis, Angus, Kathryn, Bedford, Helen, Ussher, Michael, Ford, Allison, Eadie, Douglas, MacGregor, Andy, Hunt, Kate, MacKintosh, Anne Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085
_version_ 1784592335395356672
author Stead, Martine
Jessop, Curtis
Angus, Kathryn
Bedford, Helen
Ussher, Michael
Ford, Allison
Eadie, Douglas
MacGregor, Andy
Hunt, Kate
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
author_facet Stead, Martine
Jessop, Curtis
Angus, Kathryn
Bedford, Helen
Ussher, Michael
Ford, Allison
Eadie, Douglas
MacGregor, Andy
Hunt, Kate
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
author_sort Stead, Martine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Survey response rate was 84%, among the 5931 panellists invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, financial status), COVID-19 status, vaccine acceptance, trust in COVID-19 vaccination information sources, perceptions of vaccination priority groups and perceptions of importance of second dose. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (83%) was associated with increasing age, higher level of education and having been invited for vaccination. Acceptance decreased with unconfirmed past COVID-19, greater financial hardship and non-white British ethnicity; black/black British participants had lowest acceptance. Overall, healthcare and scientific sources of information were most trusted. Compared with white British participants, other ethnicities had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with lower educational attainment or financial hardship had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with no qualifications had higher trust in media and family/friends. While trust was low overall in community or faith leaders, it was higher among those with Asian/Asian British and black/black British ethnicity compared with white British participants. Views of vaccine prioritisation were mostly consistent with UK official policy but there was support for prioritising additional groups. There was high support for having the second vaccine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted engagement is needed to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-white British ethnic groups, in younger adults, and among those with lower education, greater financial hardship and unconfirmed past infection. Healthcare professionals and scientific advisors should play a central role in communications and tailored messaging is needed for hesitant groups. Careful communication around vaccination prioritisation continues to be required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85572442021-11-02 National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications Stead, Martine Jessop, Curtis Angus, Kathryn Bedford, Helen Ussher, Michael Ford, Allison Eadie, Douglas MacGregor, Andy Hunt, Kate MacKintosh, Anne Marie BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Survey response rate was 84%, among the 5931 panellists invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, financial status), COVID-19 status, vaccine acceptance, trust in COVID-19 vaccination information sources, perceptions of vaccination priority groups and perceptions of importance of second dose. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (83%) was associated with increasing age, higher level of education and having been invited for vaccination. Acceptance decreased with unconfirmed past COVID-19, greater financial hardship and non-white British ethnicity; black/black British participants had lowest acceptance. Overall, healthcare and scientific sources of information were most trusted. Compared with white British participants, other ethnicities had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with lower educational attainment or financial hardship had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with no qualifications had higher trust in media and family/friends. While trust was low overall in community or faith leaders, it was higher among those with Asian/Asian British and black/black British ethnicity compared with white British participants. Views of vaccine prioritisation were mostly consistent with UK official policy but there was support for prioritising additional groups. There was high support for having the second vaccine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted engagement is needed to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-white British ethnic groups, in younger adults, and among those with lower education, greater financial hardship and unconfirmed past infection. Healthcare professionals and scientific advisors should play a central role in communications and tailored messaging is needed for hesitant groups. Careful communication around vaccination prioritisation continues to be required. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8557244/ /pubmed/34711602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Stead, Martine
Jessop, Curtis
Angus, Kathryn
Bedford, Helen
Ussher, Michael
Ford, Allison
Eadie, Douglas
MacGregor, Andy
Hunt, Kate
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title_full National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title_fullStr National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title_full_unstemmed National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title_short National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
title_sort national survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against covid-19: implications for communications
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085
work_keys_str_mv AT steadmartine nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT jessopcurtis nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT anguskathryn nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT bedfordhelen nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT usshermichael nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT fordallison nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT eadiedouglas nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT macgregorandy nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT huntkate nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications
AT mackintoshannemarie nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications