Cargando…
National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications
OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Surv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085 |
_version_ | 1784592335395356672 |
---|---|
author | Stead, Martine Jessop, Curtis Angus, Kathryn Bedford, Helen Ussher, Michael Ford, Allison Eadie, Douglas MacGregor, Andy Hunt, Kate MacKintosh, Anne Marie |
author_facet | Stead, Martine Jessop, Curtis Angus, Kathryn Bedford, Helen Ussher, Michael Ford, Allison Eadie, Douglas MacGregor, Andy Hunt, Kate MacKintosh, Anne Marie |
author_sort | Stead, Martine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Survey response rate was 84%, among the 5931 panellists invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, financial status), COVID-19 status, vaccine acceptance, trust in COVID-19 vaccination information sources, perceptions of vaccination priority groups and perceptions of importance of second dose. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (83%) was associated with increasing age, higher level of education and having been invited for vaccination. Acceptance decreased with unconfirmed past COVID-19, greater financial hardship and non-white British ethnicity; black/black British participants had lowest acceptance. Overall, healthcare and scientific sources of information were most trusted. Compared with white British participants, other ethnicities had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with lower educational attainment or financial hardship had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with no qualifications had higher trust in media and family/friends. While trust was low overall in community or faith leaders, it was higher among those with Asian/Asian British and black/black British ethnicity compared with white British participants. Views of vaccine prioritisation were mostly consistent with UK official policy but there was support for prioritising additional groups. There was high support for having the second vaccine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted engagement is needed to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-white British ethnic groups, in younger adults, and among those with lower education, greater financial hardship and unconfirmed past infection. Healthcare professionals and scientific advisors should play a central role in communications and tailored messaging is needed for hesitant groups. Careful communication around vaccination prioritisation continues to be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8557244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85572442021-11-02 National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications Stead, Martine Jessop, Curtis Angus, Kathryn Bedford, Helen Ussher, Michael Ford, Allison Eadie, Douglas MacGregor, Andy Hunt, Kate MacKintosh, Anne Marie BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To examine public views on COVID-19 vaccination and consider the implications for communications and targeted support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online and telephone nationally representative survey in Great Britain, January to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 4978 adults. Survey response rate was 84%, among the 5931 panellists invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education, financial status), COVID-19 status, vaccine acceptance, trust in COVID-19 vaccination information sources, perceptions of vaccination priority groups and perceptions of importance of second dose. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (83%) was associated with increasing age, higher level of education and having been invited for vaccination. Acceptance decreased with unconfirmed past COVID-19, greater financial hardship and non-white British ethnicity; black/black British participants had lowest acceptance. Overall, healthcare and scientific sources of information were most trusted. Compared with white British participants, other ethnicities had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with lower educational attainment or financial hardship had lower trust in healthcare and scientific sources. Those with no qualifications had higher trust in media and family/friends. While trust was low overall in community or faith leaders, it was higher among those with Asian/Asian British and black/black British ethnicity compared with white British participants. Views of vaccine prioritisation were mostly consistent with UK official policy but there was support for prioritising additional groups. There was high support for having the second vaccine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted engagement is needed to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in non-white British ethnic groups, in younger adults, and among those with lower education, greater financial hardship and unconfirmed past infection. Healthcare professionals and scientific advisors should play a central role in communications and tailored messaging is needed for hesitant groups. Careful communication around vaccination prioritisation continues to be required. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8557244/ /pubmed/34711602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Stead, Martine Jessop, Curtis Angus, Kathryn Bedford, Helen Ussher, Michael Ford, Allison Eadie, Douglas MacGregor, Andy Hunt, Kate MacKintosh, Anne Marie National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title | National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title_full | National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title_fullStr | National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title_full_unstemmed | National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title_short | National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications |
title_sort | national survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against covid-19: implications for communications |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34711602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steadmartine nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT jessopcurtis nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT anguskathryn nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT bedfordhelen nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT usshermichael nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT fordallison nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT eadiedouglas nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT macgregorandy nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT huntkate nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications AT mackintoshannemarie nationalsurveyofattitudestowardsandintentionstovaccinateagainstcovid19implicationsforcommunications |