Cargando…
S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8 |
_version_ | 1784592400258170880 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Jianxiong Feng, Xiaoreng Xiang, Jie Liu, Fei Leung, Frankie K. L. Chen, Bin |
author_facet | Zheng, Jianxiong Feng, Xiaoreng Xiang, Jie Liu, Fei Leung, Frankie K. L. Chen, Bin |
author_sort | Zheng, Jianxiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated: sacroiliac screw (SIS), lumbopelvic fixation (LPF), transiliac internal fixator (TIFI), S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) and S2AI screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-CS1). Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending and left twisting, respectively. Vertical stiffness, relative displacement and change in relative displacement were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: As predicted by the FE model, the vertical stiffness of the five groups in descending order was S2AI-S1, SIS, S2AI-CS1, LPF and TIFI. In terms of relative displacement, groups S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed a lower mean relative displacement, although group S2AI-CS1 exhibited greater displacement in the upper sacrum than group S2AI-S1. Group SIS displayed a moderate mean relative displacement, although the displacement of the upper sacrum was smaller than the corresponding displacement in group S2AI-CS1, while groups LPF and TIFI displayed larger mean relative displacements. Finally, in terms of change in relative displacement, groups TIFI and LPF displayed the greatest fluctuations in their motion, while groups SIS, S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed smaller fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Compared with SIS, unilateral LPF and TIFI, group S2AI-S1 displayed the greatest biomechanical stability of the Denis type I sacral fracture FE models. When the S1 pedicle screw insertion point on the affected side is damaged, S2AI-CS1 can be used as an appropriate alternative to S2AI-S1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8557573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85575732021-11-03 S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study Zheng, Jianxiong Feng, Xiaoreng Xiang, Jie Liu, Fei Leung, Frankie K. L. Chen, Bin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated: sacroiliac screw (SIS), lumbopelvic fixation (LPF), transiliac internal fixator (TIFI), S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) and S2AI screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-CS1). Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending and left twisting, respectively. Vertical stiffness, relative displacement and change in relative displacement were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: As predicted by the FE model, the vertical stiffness of the five groups in descending order was S2AI-S1, SIS, S2AI-CS1, LPF and TIFI. In terms of relative displacement, groups S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed a lower mean relative displacement, although group S2AI-CS1 exhibited greater displacement in the upper sacrum than group S2AI-S1. Group SIS displayed a moderate mean relative displacement, although the displacement of the upper sacrum was smaller than the corresponding displacement in group S2AI-CS1, while groups LPF and TIFI displayed larger mean relative displacements. Finally, in terms of change in relative displacement, groups TIFI and LPF displayed the greatest fluctuations in their motion, while groups SIS, S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed smaller fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Compared with SIS, unilateral LPF and TIFI, group S2AI-S1 displayed the greatest biomechanical stability of the Denis type I sacral fracture FE models. When the S1 pedicle screw insertion point on the affected side is damaged, S2AI-CS1 can be used as an appropriate alternative to S2AI-S1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8557573/ /pubmed/34717718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zheng, Jianxiong Feng, Xiaoreng Xiang, Jie Liu, Fei Leung, Frankie K. L. Chen, Bin S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title | S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title_full | S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title_fullStr | S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title_full_unstemmed | S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title_short | S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
title_sort | s2-alar-iliac screw and s1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengjianxiong s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy AT fengxiaoreng s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy AT xiangjie s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy AT liufei s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy AT leungfrankiekl s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy AT chenbin s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy |