Cargando…

S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study

BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Jianxiong, Feng, Xiaoreng, Xiang, Jie, Liu, Fei, Leung, Frankie K. L., Chen, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8
_version_ 1784592400258170880
author Zheng, Jianxiong
Feng, Xiaoreng
Xiang, Jie
Liu, Fei
Leung, Frankie K. L.
Chen, Bin
author_facet Zheng, Jianxiong
Feng, Xiaoreng
Xiang, Jie
Liu, Fei
Leung, Frankie K. L.
Chen, Bin
author_sort Zheng, Jianxiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated: sacroiliac screw (SIS), lumbopelvic fixation (LPF), transiliac internal fixator (TIFI), S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) and S2AI screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-CS1). Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending and left twisting, respectively. Vertical stiffness, relative displacement and change in relative displacement were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: As predicted by the FE model, the vertical stiffness of the five groups in descending order was S2AI-S1, SIS, S2AI-CS1, LPF and TIFI. In terms of relative displacement, groups S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed a lower mean relative displacement, although group S2AI-CS1 exhibited greater displacement in the upper sacrum than group S2AI-S1. Group SIS displayed a moderate mean relative displacement, although the displacement of the upper sacrum was smaller than the corresponding displacement in group S2AI-CS1, while groups LPF and TIFI displayed larger mean relative displacements. Finally, in terms of change in relative displacement, groups TIFI and LPF displayed the greatest fluctuations in their motion, while groups SIS, S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed smaller fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Compared with SIS, unilateral LPF and TIFI, group S2AI-S1 displayed the greatest biomechanical stability of the Denis type I sacral fracture FE models. When the S1 pedicle screw insertion point on the affected side is damaged, S2AI-CS1 can be used as an appropriate alternative to S2AI-S1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85575732021-11-03 S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study Zheng, Jianxiong Feng, Xiaoreng Xiang, Jie Liu, Fei Leung, Frankie K. L. Chen, Bin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Five different sacral fracture fixation methods were compared using finite element (FE) analysis to study their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Denis type I sacral fractures were created by FE modeling. Five different fixation methods for the posterior pelvic ring were simulated: sacroiliac screw (SIS), lumbopelvic fixation (LPF), transiliac internal fixator (TIFI), S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) and S2AI screw and contralateral S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-CS1). Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending and left twisting, respectively. Vertical stiffness, relative displacement and change in relative displacement were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: As predicted by the FE model, the vertical stiffness of the five groups in descending order was S2AI-S1, SIS, S2AI-CS1, LPF and TIFI. In terms of relative displacement, groups S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed a lower mean relative displacement, although group S2AI-CS1 exhibited greater displacement in the upper sacrum than group S2AI-S1. Group SIS displayed a moderate mean relative displacement, although the displacement of the upper sacrum was smaller than the corresponding displacement in group S2AI-CS1, while groups LPF and TIFI displayed larger mean relative displacements. Finally, in terms of change in relative displacement, groups TIFI and LPF displayed the greatest fluctuations in their motion, while groups SIS, S2AI-S1 and S2AI-CS1 displayed smaller fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Compared with SIS, unilateral LPF and TIFI, group S2AI-S1 displayed the greatest biomechanical stability of the Denis type I sacral fracture FE models. When the S1 pedicle screw insertion point on the affected side is damaged, S2AI-CS1 can be used as an appropriate alternative to S2AI-S1. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8. BioMed Central 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8557573/ /pubmed/34717718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zheng, Jianxiong
Feng, Xiaoreng
Xiang, Jie
Liu, Fei
Leung, Frankie K. L.
Chen, Bin
S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title_full S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title_fullStr S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title_full_unstemmed S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title_short S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
title_sort s2-alar-iliac screw and s1 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of non-osteoporotic sacral fractures: a finite element study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34717718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02805-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjianxiong s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy
AT fengxiaoreng s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy
AT xiangjie s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy
AT liufei s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy
AT leungfrankiekl s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy
AT chenbin s2alariliacscrewands1pediclescrewfixationforthetreatmentofnonosteoporoticsacralfracturesafiniteelementstudy