Cargando…

Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis

The bovine udder is colonized by a huge quantity of microorganisms that constitute the intramammary ecosystem, with a specific role in modulating not only udder homeostasis and mastitis susceptibility, but also the quality of the dairy products. However, generating high-quality bacterial DNA can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cremonesi, Paola, Severgnini, Marco, Romanò, Alicia, Sala, Lorenza, Luini, Mario, Castiglioni, Bianca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00374-21
_version_ 1784592446366154752
author Cremonesi, Paola
Severgnini, Marco
Romanò, Alicia
Sala, Lorenza
Luini, Mario
Castiglioni, Bianca
author_facet Cremonesi, Paola
Severgnini, Marco
Romanò, Alicia
Sala, Lorenza
Luini, Mario
Castiglioni, Bianca
author_sort Cremonesi, Paola
collection PubMed
description The bovine udder is colonized by a huge quantity of microorganisms that constitute the intramammary ecosystem, with a specific role in modulating not only udder homeostasis and mastitis susceptibility, but also the quality of the dairy products. However, generating high-quality bacterial DNA can be critical, especially starting from a complex biological matrix like milk, characterized by high fat, protein, and calcium contents. Here, bacterial DNA was recovered from a commercial ultra-high-temperature (UHT) milk sample artificially spiked with a predetermined mock community composition and from three bulk tank milk (raw milk) samples. The DNA was isolated using three different protocols to evaluate the effect of the extraction procedures on the milk microbiota composition. In the mock community experiment, the bacterial profiles generated by the three DNA extraction protocols were profoundly different, with the genera Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Listeria, and Salmonella underestimated by all the protocols. Only one protocol revealed values close to the expected abundances for Escherichia/Shigella spp., Bacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Pseudomonas spp. On the other hand, the nonspiked UHT milk sample exhibited a similar microbiota composition, revealing the prevalence of Acinetobacter spp., for all the DNA extraction protocols. For the raw milk samples, the three DNA extraction kits performed differently, revealing significant separations in both the microbial richness (alpha diversity) and composition (beta diversity). Our study highlights the presence of significant differences among these procedures, probably due to the different DNA extracting capacities and to the different properties of the milk samples, revealing that the selection of DNA extraction protocol is a critical point. IMPORTANCE The advance of high-throughput technologies has increased our knowledge of the world of microorganisms, especially of microbial populations inhabiting living animals. This study provides evidence that milk, as other complex sources, could be critical for generating high-quality DNA for microbiota analysis. In addition, it demonstrates that the microbial population highlighted by metagenomic studies changes in relation to different DNA extraction procedures, revealing that attention should be paid especially when comparing different studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8557886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85578862021-11-08 Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis Cremonesi, Paola Severgnini, Marco Romanò, Alicia Sala, Lorenza Luini, Mario Castiglioni, Bianca Microbiol Spectr Research Article The bovine udder is colonized by a huge quantity of microorganisms that constitute the intramammary ecosystem, with a specific role in modulating not only udder homeostasis and mastitis susceptibility, but also the quality of the dairy products. However, generating high-quality bacterial DNA can be critical, especially starting from a complex biological matrix like milk, characterized by high fat, protein, and calcium contents. Here, bacterial DNA was recovered from a commercial ultra-high-temperature (UHT) milk sample artificially spiked with a predetermined mock community composition and from three bulk tank milk (raw milk) samples. The DNA was isolated using three different protocols to evaluate the effect of the extraction procedures on the milk microbiota composition. In the mock community experiment, the bacterial profiles generated by the three DNA extraction protocols were profoundly different, with the genera Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Listeria, and Salmonella underestimated by all the protocols. Only one protocol revealed values close to the expected abundances for Escherichia/Shigella spp., Bacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Pseudomonas spp. On the other hand, the nonspiked UHT milk sample exhibited a similar microbiota composition, revealing the prevalence of Acinetobacter spp., for all the DNA extraction protocols. For the raw milk samples, the three DNA extraction kits performed differently, revealing significant separations in both the microbial richness (alpha diversity) and composition (beta diversity). Our study highlights the presence of significant differences among these procedures, probably due to the different DNA extracting capacities and to the different properties of the milk samples, revealing that the selection of DNA extraction protocol is a critical point. IMPORTANCE The advance of high-throughput technologies has increased our knowledge of the world of microorganisms, especially of microbial populations inhabiting living animals. This study provides evidence that milk, as other complex sources, could be critical for generating high-quality DNA for microbiota analysis. In addition, it demonstrates that the microbial population highlighted by metagenomic studies changes in relation to different DNA extraction procedures, revealing that attention should be paid especially when comparing different studies. American Society for Microbiology 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8557886/ /pubmed/34550002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00374-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cremonesi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Cremonesi, Paola
Severgnini, Marco
Romanò, Alicia
Sala, Lorenza
Luini, Mario
Castiglioni, Bianca
Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title_full Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title_fullStr Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title_short Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis
title_sort bovine milk microbiota: comparison among three different dna extraction protocols to identify a better approach for bacterial analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34550002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00374-21
work_keys_str_mv AT cremonesipaola bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis
AT severgninimarco bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis
AT romanoalicia bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis
AT salalorenza bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis
AT luinimario bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis
AT castiglionibianca bovinemilkmicrobiotacomparisonamongthreedifferentdnaextractionprotocolstoidentifyabetterapproachforbacterialanalysis