Cargando…

Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE: Since non-adherence (NA) to intravitreal therapy with VEGF drugs is one of the most important modifiable factors compromising treatment outcome of nAMD, the purpose of this study was to investigate the contributing factors and barriers during long-term nAMD treatment. METHODS: Barriers and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobolewska, Bianka, Sabsabi, Muhammed, Ziemssen, Focke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737546
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325763
_version_ 1784592479798951936
author Sobolewska, Bianka
Sabsabi, Muhammed
Ziemssen, Focke
author_facet Sobolewska, Bianka
Sabsabi, Muhammed
Ziemssen, Focke
author_sort Sobolewska, Bianka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Since non-adherence (NA) to intravitreal therapy with VEGF drugs is one of the most important modifiable factors compromising treatment outcome of nAMD, the purpose of this study was to investigate the contributing factors and barriers during long-term nAMD treatment. METHODS: Barriers and potential reasons for NA were prospectively measured using the Adherence Barriers Questionnaire Intravitreal Therapy (ABQ-IVT). A random sample of patients receiving intravitreal therapy was drawn based on data for different treatment periods. Three age-sex matched groups included the treatment periods of ≤30 months (group 1), between >30 months and ≤60 months (group 2), and >60 months (group 3). The occurrence of gaps between treatments and/or OCT visits was evaluated. RESULTS: NA with gaps of >56 days after the scheduled appointment was detected in 39%, 89%, and 100% of patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (groups 1 and 2 vs group 3, p < 0.001). Two or more of such gaps were observed in 6%, 72%, and 94% of patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The overall ABQ-IVT score showed corresponding differences between the groups: 25.89 ± 7.68 (group 1, 95% CI 22.07–29.71), 34.72 ± 10.32 (group 2, 95% CI: 29.59–38.86), and 33.28 ± 9.04 (group 3, 95% CI 28.78–37.77). Accordingly, the score was inversely correlated with the number of regular follow-up visits in groups 2 and 3 (Pearson correlation coefficient r = −0.65 (p = 0.003) and r = −0.5 (p = 0.034), respectively). Within the groups of longer treatment duration, univariate logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of time commitment and challenge accompanying person to be relevant barriers. CONCLUSION: NA is an arising problem with increasing duration of intravitreal therapy. Treatment barriers, detected by the ABQ-IVT, might change or increase during the course of the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85580362021-11-03 Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Sobolewska, Bianka Sabsabi, Muhammed Ziemssen, Focke Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Since non-adherence (NA) to intravitreal therapy with VEGF drugs is one of the most important modifiable factors compromising treatment outcome of nAMD, the purpose of this study was to investigate the contributing factors and barriers during long-term nAMD treatment. METHODS: Barriers and potential reasons for NA were prospectively measured using the Adherence Barriers Questionnaire Intravitreal Therapy (ABQ-IVT). A random sample of patients receiving intravitreal therapy was drawn based on data for different treatment periods. Three age-sex matched groups included the treatment periods of ≤30 months (group 1), between >30 months and ≤60 months (group 2), and >60 months (group 3). The occurrence of gaps between treatments and/or OCT visits was evaluated. RESULTS: NA with gaps of >56 days after the scheduled appointment was detected in 39%, 89%, and 100% of patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (groups 1 and 2 vs group 3, p < 0.001). Two or more of such gaps were observed in 6%, 72%, and 94% of patients in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The overall ABQ-IVT score showed corresponding differences between the groups: 25.89 ± 7.68 (group 1, 95% CI 22.07–29.71), 34.72 ± 10.32 (group 2, 95% CI: 29.59–38.86), and 33.28 ± 9.04 (group 3, 95% CI 28.78–37.77). Accordingly, the score was inversely correlated with the number of regular follow-up visits in groups 2 and 3 (Pearson correlation coefficient r = −0.65 (p = 0.003) and r = −0.5 (p = 0.034), respectively). Within the groups of longer treatment duration, univariate logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of time commitment and challenge accompanying person to be relevant barriers. CONCLUSION: NA is an arising problem with increasing duration of intravitreal therapy. Treatment barriers, detected by the ABQ-IVT, might change or increase during the course of the treatment. Dove 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8558036/ /pubmed/34737546 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325763 Text en © 2021 Sobolewska et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sobolewska, Bianka
Sabsabi, Muhammed
Ziemssen, Focke
Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_full Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_fullStr Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_short Importance of Treatment Duration: Unmasking Barriers and Discovering the Reasons for Undertreatment of Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_sort importance of treatment duration: unmasking barriers and discovering the reasons for undertreatment of anti-vegf agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737546
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S325763
work_keys_str_mv AT sobolewskabianka importanceoftreatmentdurationunmaskingbarriersanddiscoveringthereasonsforundertreatmentofantivegfagentsinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT sabsabimuhammed importanceoftreatmentdurationunmaskingbarriersanddiscoveringthereasonsforundertreatmentofantivegfagentsinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT ziemssenfocke importanceoftreatmentdurationunmaskingbarriersanddiscoveringthereasonsforundertreatmentofantivegfagentsinneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration