Cargando…

Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive predictability of intraoperative aberrometry (IA, ORA, Alcon) and Barrett True-K/Universal II formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. METHODS: Retrospective study of normal and post-corneal refracti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouvea, Larissa, Sioufi, Kareem, Brown, Colin E, Waring IV, George, Chamon, Wallace, Rocha, Karolinne Maia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737545
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S334489
_version_ 1784592481773420544
author Gouvea, Larissa
Sioufi, Kareem
Brown, Colin E
Waring IV, George
Chamon, Wallace
Rocha, Karolinne Maia
author_facet Gouvea, Larissa
Sioufi, Kareem
Brown, Colin E
Waring IV, George
Chamon, Wallace
Rocha, Karolinne Maia
author_sort Gouvea, Larissa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the refractive predictability of intraoperative aberrometry (IA, ORA, Alcon) and Barrett True-K/Universal II formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. METHODS: Retrospective study of normal and post-corneal refractive surgery eyes that underwent cataract surgery with IA at tertiary academic center. Preoperatively, IOL power calculations were performed using Barrett Universal II (normal eyes) or Barrett True-K (post-corneal refractive surgery eyes) formulas. Intraoperatively, aphakic IA measurements were used for IOL power calculations. Mean absolute refractive prediction error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ±0.50, ±0.75 and ±1.00 D were calculated. Refractive predictability was also evaluated in short, normal, and long eyes. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three eyes were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MAE of preoperative formulas and IA for post-hyperopic laser vision correction (LVC), post-myopic LVC, post-radial keratotomy (RK) and normal eyes. For prediction error within ±0.5 D in post-corneal refractive surgery eyes, range of agreement between Barrett True-K and IA ranged from 28% (7/25) of the time in post-RK eyes to 49% (40/81) of the time in post-hyperopic LVC; the corresponding value for Barrett Universal II/IA was 62% (64/103) in normal eyes. When there was disagreement, IA outperformed Barrett True-K in post-hyperopic LVC eyes and Barrett formula outperformed IA in post-myopic LVC, post-RK, and normal eyes. CONCLUSION: IA appears to be comparable to Barrett formulas for IOL power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. In post-hyperopic LVC, IA yields better results compared to Barrett True-K formula; in real-life scenarios, IA reveals statistical advantage over the Barrett True-K no history formula for eyes post-hyperopic LVC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85580442021-11-03 Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes Gouvea, Larissa Sioufi, Kareem Brown, Colin E Waring IV, George Chamon, Wallace Rocha, Karolinne Maia Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the refractive predictability of intraoperative aberrometry (IA, ORA, Alcon) and Barrett True-K/Universal II formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. METHODS: Retrospective study of normal and post-corneal refractive surgery eyes that underwent cataract surgery with IA at tertiary academic center. Preoperatively, IOL power calculations were performed using Barrett Universal II (normal eyes) or Barrett True-K (post-corneal refractive surgery eyes) formulas. Intraoperatively, aphakic IA measurements were used for IOL power calculations. Mean absolute refractive prediction error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ±0.50, ±0.75 and ±1.00 D were calculated. Refractive predictability was also evaluated in short, normal, and long eyes. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three eyes were included in the analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MAE of preoperative formulas and IA for post-hyperopic laser vision correction (LVC), post-myopic LVC, post-radial keratotomy (RK) and normal eyes. For prediction error within ±0.5 D in post-corneal refractive surgery eyes, range of agreement between Barrett True-K and IA ranged from 28% (7/25) of the time in post-RK eyes to 49% (40/81) of the time in post-hyperopic LVC; the corresponding value for Barrett Universal II/IA was 62% (64/103) in normal eyes. When there was disagreement, IA outperformed Barrett True-K in post-hyperopic LVC eyes and Barrett formula outperformed IA in post-myopic LVC, post-RK, and normal eyes. CONCLUSION: IA appears to be comparable to Barrett formulas for IOL power calculations in post-corneal refractive surgery and normal eyes. In post-hyperopic LVC, IA yields better results compared to Barrett True-K formula; in real-life scenarios, IA reveals statistical advantage over the Barrett True-K no history formula for eyes post-hyperopic LVC. Dove 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8558044/ /pubmed/34737545 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S334489 Text en © 2021 Gouvea et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gouvea, Larissa
Sioufi, Kareem
Brown, Colin E
Waring IV, George
Chamon, Wallace
Rocha, Karolinne Maia
Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title_full Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title_fullStr Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title_full_unstemmed Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title_short Refractive Accuracy of Barrett True-K vs Intraoperative Aberrometry for IOL Power Calculation in Post-Corneal Refractive Surgery Eyes
title_sort refractive accuracy of barrett true-k vs intraoperative aberrometry for iol power calculation in post-corneal refractive surgery eyes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737545
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S334489
work_keys_str_mv AT gouvealarissa refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes
AT sioufikareem refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes
AT browncoline refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes
AT waringivgeorge refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes
AT chamonwallace refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes
AT rochakarolinnemaia refractiveaccuracyofbarretttruekvsintraoperativeaberrometryforiolpowercalculationinpostcornealrefractivesurgeryeyes