Cargando…
Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing
AIMS: The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34619989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0121.R1 |
_version_ | 1784592562856656896 |
---|---|
author | Dailey, Hannah L. Schwarzenberg, Peter Webb, III, Edmund B. Boran, Sinead A. M. Guerin, Shane Harty, James A. |
author_facet | Dailey, Hannah L. Schwarzenberg, Peter Webb, III, Edmund B. Boran, Sinead A. M. Guerin, Shane Harty, James A. |
author_sort | Dailey, Hannah L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking. METHODS: Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing. RESULTS: A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):825–833. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8558444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85584442021-11-09 Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing Dailey, Hannah L. Schwarzenberg, Peter Webb, III, Edmund B. Boran, Sinead A. M. Guerin, Shane Harty, James A. Bone Jt Open Trauma AIMS: The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking. METHODS: Patients were treated in a single level I trauma centre over a 2.5-year period. Group allocation was not randomized; both the micromotion nail and standard-of-care static locking nails (control group) were commercially available and selected at the discretion of the treating surgeons. Injury risk levels were quantified using the Nonunion Risk Determination (NURD) score. Radiological healing was assessed until 24 weeks or clinical union. Low-dose CT scans were acquired at 12 weeks and virtual mechanical testing was performed to objectively assess structural bone healing. RESULTS: A total of 37 micromotion patients and 46 control patients were evaluated. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, the proportion of open fractures, or NURD score. There were no nonunions (0%) in the micromotion group versus five (11%) in the control group. The proportion of fractures united was significantly higher in the micromotion group compared to control at 12 weeks (54% vs 30% united; p = 0.043), 18 weeks (81% vs 59%; p = 0.034), and 24 weeks (97% vs 74%; p = 0.005). Structural bone healing scores as assessed by CT scans tended to be higher with micromotion compared to control and this difference reached significance in patients who had biological comorbidities such as smoking. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, micromotion fixation was associated with improved healing compared to standard tibial nailing. Further prospective clinical studies will be needed to assess the strength and generalizability of any potential benefits of micromotion fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):825–833. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8558444/ /pubmed/34619989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0121.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Trauma Dailey, Hannah L. Schwarzenberg, Peter Webb, III, Edmund B. Boran, Sinead A. M. Guerin, Shane Harty, James A. Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title | Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title_full | Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title_fullStr | Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title_full_unstemmed | Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title_short | Pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
title_sort | pilot study of micromotion nailing for mechanical stimulation of tibial fracture healing |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34619989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0121.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daileyhannahl pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing AT schwarzenbergpeter pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing AT webbiiiedmundb pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing AT boransineadam pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing AT guerinshane pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing AT hartyjamesa pilotstudyofmicromotionnailingformechanicalstimulationoftibialfracturehealing |