Cargando…
Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Regi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1 |
_version_ | 1784592564541718528 |
---|---|
author | Matar, Hosam E. Porter, Patrick J. Porter, Martyn L. |
author_facet | Matar, Hosam E. Porter, Patrick J. Porter, Martyn L. |
author_sort | Matar, Hosam E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent. CONCLUSION: Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8558451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85584512021-11-09 Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach Matar, Hosam E. Porter, Patrick J. Porter, Martyn L. Bone Jt Open Systematic Review AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent. CONCLUSION: Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8558451/ /pubmed/34587776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Matar, Hosam E. Porter, Patrick J. Porter, Martyn L. Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title | Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title_full | Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title_fullStr | Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title_short | Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
title_sort | metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matarhosame metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach AT porterpatrickj metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach AT portermartynl metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach |