Cargando…

Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach

AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matar, Hosam E., Porter, Patrick J., Porter, Martyn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1
_version_ 1784592564541718528
author Matar, Hosam E.
Porter, Patrick J.
Porter, Martyn L.
author_facet Matar, Hosam E.
Porter, Patrick J.
Porter, Martyn L.
author_sort Matar, Hosam E.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent. CONCLUSION: Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85584512021-11-09 Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach Matar, Hosam E. Porter, Patrick J. Porter, Martyn L. Bone Jt Open Systematic Review AIMS: Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence. RESULTS: We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent. CONCLUSION: Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8558451/ /pubmed/34587776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Matar, Hosam E.
Porter, Patrick J.
Porter, Martyn L.
Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title_full Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title_fullStr Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title_full_unstemmed Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title_short Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
title_sort metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT matarhosame metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach
AT porterpatrickj metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach
AT portermartynl metalallergyinprimaryandrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyascopingreviewandevidencebasedpracticalapproach