Cargando…

Malseating of modular dual mobility liners

AIMS: Prior studies have identified that malseating of a modular dual mobility liner can occur, with previous reported incidences between 5.8% and 16.4%. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of malseating in dual mobility implants at our institution, assess for risk factors for liner...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guntin, Jonathan, Plummer, Darren, Della Valle, Craig, DeBenedetti, Anne, Nam, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0124.R1
_version_ 1784592565037694976
author Guntin, Jonathan
Plummer, Darren
Della Valle, Craig
DeBenedetti, Anne
Nam, Denis
author_facet Guntin, Jonathan
Plummer, Darren
Della Valle, Craig
DeBenedetti, Anne
Nam, Denis
author_sort Guntin, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Prior studies have identified that malseating of a modular dual mobility liner can occur, with previous reported incidences between 5.8% and 16.4%. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of malseating in dual mobility implants at our institution, assess for risk factors for liner malseating, and investigate whether liner malseating has any impact on clinical outcomes after surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 239 primary and revision total hip arthroplasties with a modular dual mobility liner. Two independent reviewers assessed radiographs for each patient twice for evidence of malseating, with a third observer acting as a tiebreaker. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for malseating with Youden’s index used to identify cut-off points. Cohen’s kappa test was used to measure interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: In all, 12 liners (5.0%), including eight Stryker (6.8%) and four Zimmer Biomet (3.3%), had radiological evidence of malseating. Interobserver reliability was found to be 0.453 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.64), suggesting weak inter-rater agreement, with strong agreement being greater than 0.8. We found component size of 50 mm or less to be associated with liner malseating on univariate analysis (p = 0.031). Patients with malseated liners appeared to have no associated clinical consequences, and none required revision surgery at a mean of 14 months (1.4 to 99.2) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The incidence of liner malseating was 5.0%, which is similar to other reports. Component size of 50 mm or smaller was identified as a risk factor for malseating. Surgeons should be aware that malseating can occur and implant design changes or changes in instrumentation should be considered to lower the risk of malseating. Although further follow-up is needed, it remains to be seen if malseating is associated with any clinical consequences. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):858–864.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85584532021-11-09 Malseating of modular dual mobility liners Guntin, Jonathan Plummer, Darren Della Valle, Craig DeBenedetti, Anne Nam, Denis Bone Jt Open Hip AIMS: Prior studies have identified that malseating of a modular dual mobility liner can occur, with previous reported incidences between 5.8% and 16.4%. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of malseating in dual mobility implants at our institution, assess for risk factors for liner malseating, and investigate whether liner malseating has any impact on clinical outcomes after surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 239 primary and revision total hip arthroplasties with a modular dual mobility liner. Two independent reviewers assessed radiographs for each patient twice for evidence of malseating, with a third observer acting as a tiebreaker. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for malseating with Youden’s index used to identify cut-off points. Cohen’s kappa test was used to measure interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: In all, 12 liners (5.0%), including eight Stryker (6.8%) and four Zimmer Biomet (3.3%), had radiological evidence of malseating. Interobserver reliability was found to be 0.453 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.64), suggesting weak inter-rater agreement, with strong agreement being greater than 0.8. We found component size of 50 mm or less to be associated with liner malseating on univariate analysis (p = 0.031). Patients with malseated liners appeared to have no associated clinical consequences, and none required revision surgery at a mean of 14 months (1.4 to 99.2) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The incidence of liner malseating was 5.0%, which is similar to other reports. Component size of 50 mm or smaller was identified as a risk factor for malseating. Surgeons should be aware that malseating can occur and implant design changes or changes in instrumentation should be considered to lower the risk of malseating. Although further follow-up is needed, it remains to be seen if malseating is associated with any clinical consequences. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):858–864. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8558453/ /pubmed/34658249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0124.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Hip
Guntin, Jonathan
Plummer, Darren
Della Valle, Craig
DeBenedetti, Anne
Nam, Denis
Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title_full Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title_fullStr Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title_full_unstemmed Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title_short Malseating of modular dual mobility liners
title_sort malseating of modular dual mobility liners
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0124.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT guntinjonathan malseatingofmodulardualmobilityliners
AT plummerdarren malseatingofmodulardualmobilityliners
AT dellavallecraig malseatingofmodulardualmobilityliners
AT debenedettianne malseatingofmodulardualmobilityliners
AT namdenis malseatingofmodulardualmobilityliners