Cargando…

The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures

OBJECTIVES: To understand the surgeon’s role in inducing and correcting movement inaccuracies during intraocular membrane peeling procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optical sensors were used to record movement errors during actuation at the distal tip of 23-gauge pneumatic forceps both when the hand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doğramacı, Mahmut, Steel, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702022
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.40035
_version_ 1784592620258852864
author Doğramacı, Mahmut
Steel, David
author_facet Doğramacı, Mahmut
Steel, David
author_sort Doğramacı, Mahmut
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To understand the surgeon’s role in inducing and correcting movement inaccuracies during intraocular membrane peeling procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optical sensors were used to record movement errors during actuation at the distal tip of 23-gauge pneumatic forceps both when the handle was handheld and when fixed with no human contact. Movements were also recorded at the proximal part of the forceps shaft (near the sclerotomy site) and compared to movement recorded at the distal end. The root mean square (RMS) and range values of the signals obtained from the sensors were calculated before and after applying high (7-13 Hz) and low (<5 Hz) frequency filters. RESULTS: Comparison of RMS and range values of movement errors at the distal end of the forceps during actuation when the forceps handle was fixed and handheld showed that without human contact, these values were significantly lower in the X axis at all frequencies and in the Z axis at high frequencies compared to handheld (p<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the Y axis. Comparison of values from the distal and proximal ends of the forceps showed that when the forceps were fixed, RMS and range values were significantly higher for movement errors at the distal end compared to the proximal end at all frequencies (p<0.05). There was significant positive correlation between the extent of actuation and the RMS and range values for high-frequency movement errors but not low-frequency errors in all three axes with the fixed pneumatic handle (r=0.21-0.51, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgeon- and non-surgeon-related errors are apparent in all axes, but skilled surgeons correct these errors through visual feedback, resulting in better correction in the visible planes. Sclerotomy sites provide a pivoting and stabilizing point for the shaft of the forceps and it is likely that skilled surgeons make use of the sclerotomy point to dampen motion errors, a skill worth teaching to beginners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85586822021-11-17 The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures Doğramacı, Mahmut Steel, David Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To understand the surgeon’s role in inducing and correcting movement inaccuracies during intraocular membrane peeling procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optical sensors were used to record movement errors during actuation at the distal tip of 23-gauge pneumatic forceps both when the handle was handheld and when fixed with no human contact. Movements were also recorded at the proximal part of the forceps shaft (near the sclerotomy site) and compared to movement recorded at the distal end. The root mean square (RMS) and range values of the signals obtained from the sensors were calculated before and after applying high (7-13 Hz) and low (<5 Hz) frequency filters. RESULTS: Comparison of RMS and range values of movement errors at the distal end of the forceps during actuation when the forceps handle was fixed and handheld showed that without human contact, these values were significantly lower in the X axis at all frequencies and in the Z axis at high frequencies compared to handheld (p<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the Y axis. Comparison of values from the distal and proximal ends of the forceps showed that when the forceps were fixed, RMS and range values were significantly higher for movement errors at the distal end compared to the proximal end at all frequencies (p<0.05). There was significant positive correlation between the extent of actuation and the RMS and range values for high-frequency movement errors but not low-frequency errors in all three axes with the fixed pneumatic handle (r=0.21-0.51, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgeon- and non-surgeon-related errors are apparent in all axes, but skilled surgeons correct these errors through visual feedback, resulting in better correction in the visible planes. Sclerotomy sites provide a pivoting and stabilizing point for the shaft of the forceps and it is likely that skilled surgeons make use of the sclerotomy point to dampen motion errors, a skill worth teaching to beginners. Galenos Publishing 2021-10 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8558682/ /pubmed/34702022 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.40035 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Doğramacı, Mahmut
Steel, David
The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title_full The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title_fullStr The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title_full_unstemmed The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title_short The Surgeon’s Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures
title_sort surgeon’s role in inducing and controlling motion errors during intraocular membrane peeling procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702022
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.40035
work_keys_str_mv AT dogramacımahmut thesurgeonsroleininducingandcontrollingmotionerrorsduringintraocularmembranepeelingprocedures
AT steeldavid thesurgeonsroleininducingandcontrollingmotionerrorsduringintraocularmembranepeelingprocedures
AT dogramacımahmut surgeonsroleininducingandcontrollingmotionerrorsduringintraocularmembranepeelingprocedures
AT steeldavid surgeonsroleininducingandcontrollingmotionerrorsduringintraocularmembranepeelingprocedures