Cargando…

Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?

Although ophthalmology has made significant progress and awareness about eye care and the accessibility of health technology has increased, there are still aspects that might be improved. One of the ways to achieve improvement is philosophical investigation of some reasoning and behavior styles in o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceyhan, Doğan, Yaşar, Tekin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.29569
_version_ 1784592622669529088
author Ceyhan, Doğan
Yaşar, Tekin
author_facet Ceyhan, Doğan
Yaşar, Tekin
author_sort Ceyhan, Doğan
collection PubMed
description Although ophthalmology has made significant progress and awareness about eye care and the accessibility of health technology has increased, there are still aspects that might be improved. One of the ways to achieve improvement is philosophical investigation of some reasoning and behavior styles in ophthalmology. Philosophy means love of wisdom, and the philosophical approach can contribute to increasing the wisdom of ophthalmologists. Logical fallacies currently affecting the decisions of ophthalmologists can be reduced. “ontology” can contribute to a better understanding of “the nature of reality”. A detailed inquiry about the basic concepts concerning ophthalmology may support better reasoning styles. Reflecting on epistemological questions such as “What is true knowledge?”, justifying information, and having a skeptical attitude may help to make decisions with more accurate information. The philosophy of science is concerned with the detailed investigation, questioning, and understanding of ophthalmologists’ scientific activities and may form the missing link between ophthalmology and philosophy. Moreover, the claim that philosophy’s contribution to science is of no interest to scientists warrants consideration. The philosophers of science Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn have made significant contributions to the perception of science that are still valid today. Karl Popper proposed that a demarcation between science and pseudo-science might be made through the concept of “falsification”. According to this concept, a statement is scientific if it can be tested and falsified using valid methods. Thomas Kuhn stated that major scientific changes (i.e., revolutions) occur through paradigm shifts. Although the areas of moral philosophy/ethics/bioethics have generated useful ideas and practices for the improvement of the art of medicine, bioethics in particular deserves to be questioned philosophically by physicians living in real life. Ophthalmologists can develop more beneficial and realistic ophthalmology education, research, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation practices by utilizing the basic methods of philosophy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85586922021-11-17 Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy? Ceyhan, Doğan Yaşar, Tekin Turk J Ophthalmol Review Although ophthalmology has made significant progress and awareness about eye care and the accessibility of health technology has increased, there are still aspects that might be improved. One of the ways to achieve improvement is philosophical investigation of some reasoning and behavior styles in ophthalmology. Philosophy means love of wisdom, and the philosophical approach can contribute to increasing the wisdom of ophthalmologists. Logical fallacies currently affecting the decisions of ophthalmologists can be reduced. “ontology” can contribute to a better understanding of “the nature of reality”. A detailed inquiry about the basic concepts concerning ophthalmology may support better reasoning styles. Reflecting on epistemological questions such as “What is true knowledge?”, justifying information, and having a skeptical attitude may help to make decisions with more accurate information. The philosophy of science is concerned with the detailed investigation, questioning, and understanding of ophthalmologists’ scientific activities and may form the missing link between ophthalmology and philosophy. Moreover, the claim that philosophy’s contribution to science is of no interest to scientists warrants consideration. The philosophers of science Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn have made significant contributions to the perception of science that are still valid today. Karl Popper proposed that a demarcation between science and pseudo-science might be made through the concept of “falsification”. According to this concept, a statement is scientific if it can be tested and falsified using valid methods. Thomas Kuhn stated that major scientific changes (i.e., revolutions) occur through paradigm shifts. Although the areas of moral philosophy/ethics/bioethics have generated useful ideas and practices for the improvement of the art of medicine, bioethics in particular deserves to be questioned philosophically by physicians living in real life. Ophthalmologists can develop more beneficial and realistic ophthalmology education, research, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation practices by utilizing the basic methods of philosophy. Galenos Publishing 2021-10 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8558692/ /pubmed/34702804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.29569 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ceyhan, Doğan
Yaşar, Tekin
Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title_full Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title_fullStr Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title_full_unstemmed Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title_short Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?
title_sort does ophthalmology need philosophy?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.29569
work_keys_str_mv AT ceyhandogan doesophthalmologyneedphilosophy
AT yasartekin doesophthalmologyneedphilosophy