Cargando…
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder. While current treatment options are effective for some, many individuals fail to respond to first-line psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged over the past several decades...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20451253211049921 |
_version_ | 1784592634870759424 |
---|---|
author | Petrosino, Nicholas J. Cosmo, Camila Berlow, Yosef A. Zandvakili, Amin van ’t Wout-Frank, Mascha Philip, Noah S. |
author_facet | Petrosino, Nicholas J. Cosmo, Camila Berlow, Yosef A. Zandvakili, Amin van ’t Wout-Frank, Mascha Philip, Noah S. |
author_sort | Petrosino, Nicholas J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder. While current treatment options are effective for some, many individuals fail to respond to first-line psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged over the past several decades as a noninvasive neuromodulatory intervention for psychiatric disorders including depression, with mounting evidence for its safety, tolerability, and efficacy in treating PTSD. While several meta-analyses of TMS for PTSD have been published to date showing large effect sizes on PTSD overall, there is marked variability between studies, making it difficult to draw simple conclusions about how best to treat patients. The following review summarizes over 20 years of the existing literature on TMS as a PTSD treatment, and includes nine randomized controlled trials and many other prospective studies of TMS monotherapy, as well as five randomized controlled trials investigating TMS combined with psychotherapy. While the majority of studies utilize repetitive TMS targeted to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at low frequency (1 Hz) or high frequency (10 or 20 Hz), others have used alternative frequencies, targeted other regions (most commonly the left DLPFC), or trialed different stimulation protocols utilizing newer TMS modalities such as synchronized TMS and theta-burst TMS (TBS). Although it is encouraging that positive outcomes have been shown, there is a paucity of studies directly comparing available approaches. Biomarkers, such as functional imaging and electroencephalography, were seldomly incorporated yet remain crucial for advancing our knowledge of how to predict and monitor treatment response and for understanding mechanism of action of TMS in this population. Effects on PTSD are often sustained for up to 2–3 months, but more long-term studies are needed in order to understand and predict duration of response. In short, while TMS appears safe and effective for PTSD, important steps are needed to operationalize optimal approaches for patients suffering from this disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8558793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85587932021-11-02 Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder Petrosino, Nicholas J. Cosmo, Camila Berlow, Yosef A. Zandvakili, Amin van ’t Wout-Frank, Mascha Philip, Noah S. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol Review Article Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder. While current treatment options are effective for some, many individuals fail to respond to first-line psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged over the past several decades as a noninvasive neuromodulatory intervention for psychiatric disorders including depression, with mounting evidence for its safety, tolerability, and efficacy in treating PTSD. While several meta-analyses of TMS for PTSD have been published to date showing large effect sizes on PTSD overall, there is marked variability between studies, making it difficult to draw simple conclusions about how best to treat patients. The following review summarizes over 20 years of the existing literature on TMS as a PTSD treatment, and includes nine randomized controlled trials and many other prospective studies of TMS monotherapy, as well as five randomized controlled trials investigating TMS combined with psychotherapy. While the majority of studies utilize repetitive TMS targeted to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at low frequency (1 Hz) or high frequency (10 or 20 Hz), others have used alternative frequencies, targeted other regions (most commonly the left DLPFC), or trialed different stimulation protocols utilizing newer TMS modalities such as synchronized TMS and theta-burst TMS (TBS). Although it is encouraging that positive outcomes have been shown, there is a paucity of studies directly comparing available approaches. Biomarkers, such as functional imaging and electroencephalography, were seldomly incorporated yet remain crucial for advancing our knowledge of how to predict and monitor treatment response and for understanding mechanism of action of TMS in this population. Effects on PTSD are often sustained for up to 2–3 months, but more long-term studies are needed in order to understand and predict duration of response. In short, while TMS appears safe and effective for PTSD, important steps are needed to operationalize optimal approaches for patients suffering from this disorder. SAGE Publications 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8558793/ /pubmed/34733479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20451253211049921 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Petrosino, Nicholas J. Cosmo, Camila Berlow, Yosef A. Zandvakili, Amin van ’t Wout-Frank, Mascha Philip, Noah S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title | Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title_full | Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title_fullStr | Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title_short | Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
title_sort | transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20451253211049921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrosinonicholasj transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder AT cosmocamila transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder AT berlowyosefa transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder AT zandvakiliamin transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder AT vantwoutfrankmascha transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder AT philipnoahs transcranialmagneticstimulationforposttraumaticstressdisorder |