Cargando…

A Five Autophagy-Related Long Non-Coding RNA Prognostic Model for Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common pathological type among non-small cell lung cancer. Although huge progress has been made in terms of early diagnosis and precision treatment in recent years, the overall 5-year survival rate of a patient remains low. In our study, we try to construct a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Boxuan, Yang, Shuanying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737609
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S334601
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common pathological type among non-small cell lung cancer. Although huge progress has been made in terms of early diagnosis and precision treatment in recent years, the overall 5-year survival rate of a patient remains low. In our study, we try to construct an autophagy-related lncRNA prognostic signature that may guide clinical practice. METHODS: The mRNA and lncRNA expression matrix of lung adenocarcinoma patients were retrieved from the TCGA database. Next, we constructed a co-expression network of lncRNAs and autophagy-related genes. Lasso regression and multivariate Cox regression were then applied to establish a prognostic risk model. Subsequently, a risk score was generated to differentiate the high and low risk groups and a ROC curve and nomogram to visualize the predictive ability of the current signature. Finally, gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis were executed via GSEA. RESULTS: A total of 1,703 autophagy-related lncRNAs were screened and five autophagy-related lncRNAs (LINC01137, AL691432.2, LINC01116, AL606489.1, and HLA-DQB1-AS1) were finally included in our signature. Judging from univariate (HR=1.075, 95% CI=1.046–1.104) and multivariate (HR=1.088, 95% CI=1.057−1.120) Cox regression analysis, the risk score is an independent factor for LUAD patients. Further, the AUC value based on the risk score for 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years, was 0.735, 0.672, and 0.662, respectively, indicating a reliable model. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed low risk patients were more sensitive to Gemcitabine and Gefitinib, while high risk patients had a better response to Paclitaxel and Erlotinib. Moreover, the lncRNAs included in our signature were primarily enriched in the autophagy process, metabolism, p53 pathway, and JAK/STAT pathway. Finally, a multi-omics analysis of correlated genes showed CFLAR overexpressed in the tumor sample, while GAPDH and MLST8 had a slightly higher expression in the normal sample. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study indicated that the prognostic model we generated had certain predictability for LUAD patients’ prognosis and the related genes might be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.