Cargando…

An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food

CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newell-Price, John, Huatan, Hiep, Quirke, Jo, Porter, John, Daniel, Eleni, Mumdzic, Enis, Voet, Bernard, Keevil, Brian, Whitaker, Martin J, Ross, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606
_version_ 1784592647156924416
author Newell-Price, John
Huatan, Hiep
Quirke, Jo
Porter, John
Daniel, Eleni
Mumdzic, Enis
Voet, Bernard
Keevil, Brian
Whitaker, Martin J
Ross, Richard J
author_facet Newell-Price, John
Huatan, Hiep
Quirke, Jo
Porter, John
Daniel, Eleni
Mumdzic, Enis
Voet, Bernard
Keevil, Brian
Whitaker, Martin J
Ross, Richard J
author_sort Newell-Price, John
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral NT formulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A lipid-based formulation of native testosterone filled into soft-gelatin capsules at 40 mg per capsule was designed with 2 years of stability at ambient temperature. Pharmacokinetic comparison studies of this oral lipidic NT formulation to oral TU were conducted in dogs and hypogonadal men. RESULTS: In dogs, 40 mg NT was well absorbed under fasted conditions whereas 40 mg TU required a high-fat meal: for NT, the mean fed/fasted AUC ratio was 1.63 and for TU 7.05. In hypogonadal men, fed and fasted NT had similar pharmacokinetics: C(max) mean 26.5 vs 30.4 nmol/L (769 vs 882 ng/dL), AUC(0–10 h) 87 vs 88.6 h nmol/L. NT (fed state) showed a testosterone AUC increase of 45% between 120 and 200 mg, and NT 200 mg gave a similar mean AUC(0–10 h) to TU 80 mg: 87 vs 64.8 h nmol/L. Serum TU levels were variable and on a molar basis were ~ten-fold higher than serum testosterone levels after TU 80 mg fed. The DHT: testosterone AUC(0–10 h) ratio was more physiological for NT than TU being 0.19 vs 0.36. There were no emerging safety concerns with NT. CONCLUSION: This novel oral lipidic native testosterone formulation has potential advantages over oral TU of dosing independently of food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. Significance statement There is no licensed oral testosterone because of challenges in formulation, and the oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate, require a fatty meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone levels. We have overcome the design challenges and formulated an oral native testosterone that can be taken with or without food and provides physiological levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in hypogonadal men. This formulation, DITEST, has the potential advantage of being oral for patients who do not tolerate injections and less risk of adverse events that might theoretically be associated with elevated dihydrotestosterone levels. Future studies will need to define the dosing regimen for replacement in hypogonadal men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85588462021-11-03 An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food Newell-Price, John Huatan, Hiep Quirke, Jo Porter, John Daniel, Eleni Mumdzic, Enis Voet, Bernard Keevil, Brian Whitaker, Martin J Ross, Richard J Eur J Endocrinol Clinical Study CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral NT formulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A lipid-based formulation of native testosterone filled into soft-gelatin capsules at 40 mg per capsule was designed with 2 years of stability at ambient temperature. Pharmacokinetic comparison studies of this oral lipidic NT formulation to oral TU were conducted in dogs and hypogonadal men. RESULTS: In dogs, 40 mg NT was well absorbed under fasted conditions whereas 40 mg TU required a high-fat meal: for NT, the mean fed/fasted AUC ratio was 1.63 and for TU 7.05. In hypogonadal men, fed and fasted NT had similar pharmacokinetics: C(max) mean 26.5 vs 30.4 nmol/L (769 vs 882 ng/dL), AUC(0–10 h) 87 vs 88.6 h nmol/L. NT (fed state) showed a testosterone AUC increase of 45% between 120 and 200 mg, and NT 200 mg gave a similar mean AUC(0–10 h) to TU 80 mg: 87 vs 64.8 h nmol/L. Serum TU levels were variable and on a molar basis were ~ten-fold higher than serum testosterone levels after TU 80 mg fed. The DHT: testosterone AUC(0–10 h) ratio was more physiological for NT than TU being 0.19 vs 0.36. There were no emerging safety concerns with NT. CONCLUSION: This novel oral lipidic native testosterone formulation has potential advantages over oral TU of dosing independently of food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. Significance statement There is no licensed oral testosterone because of challenges in formulation, and the oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate, require a fatty meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone levels. We have overcome the design challenges and formulated an oral native testosterone that can be taken with or without food and provides physiological levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in hypogonadal men. This formulation, DITEST, has the potential advantage of being oral for patients who do not tolerate injections and less risk of adverse events that might theoretically be associated with elevated dihydrotestosterone levels. Future studies will need to define the dosing regimen for replacement in hypogonadal men. Bioscientifica Ltd 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8558846/ /pubmed/34379604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Newell-Price, John
Huatan, Hiep
Quirke, Jo
Porter, John
Daniel, Eleni
Mumdzic, Enis
Voet, Bernard
Keevil, Brian
Whitaker, Martin J
Ross, Richard J
An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title_full An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title_fullStr An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title_full_unstemmed An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title_short An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
title_sort oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606
work_keys_str_mv AT newellpricejohn anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT huatanhiep anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT quirkejo anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT porterjohn anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT danieleleni anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT mumdzicenis anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT voetbernard anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT keevilbrian anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT whitakermartinj anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT rossrichardj anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT newellpricejohn orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT huatanhiep orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT quirkejo orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT porterjohn orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT danieleleni orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT mumdzicenis orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT voetbernard orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT keevilbrian orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT whitakermartinj orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood
AT rossrichardj orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood