Cargando…
An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food
CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606 |
_version_ | 1784592647156924416 |
---|---|
author | Newell-Price, John Huatan, Hiep Quirke, Jo Porter, John Daniel, Eleni Mumdzic, Enis Voet, Bernard Keevil, Brian Whitaker, Martin J Ross, Richard J |
author_facet | Newell-Price, John Huatan, Hiep Quirke, Jo Porter, John Daniel, Eleni Mumdzic, Enis Voet, Bernard Keevil, Brian Whitaker, Martin J Ross, Richard J |
author_sort | Newell-Price, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral NT formulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A lipid-based formulation of native testosterone filled into soft-gelatin capsules at 40 mg per capsule was designed with 2 years of stability at ambient temperature. Pharmacokinetic comparison studies of this oral lipidic NT formulation to oral TU were conducted in dogs and hypogonadal men. RESULTS: In dogs, 40 mg NT was well absorbed under fasted conditions whereas 40 mg TU required a high-fat meal: for NT, the mean fed/fasted AUC ratio was 1.63 and for TU 7.05. In hypogonadal men, fed and fasted NT had similar pharmacokinetics: C(max) mean 26.5 vs 30.4 nmol/L (769 vs 882 ng/dL), AUC(0–10 h) 87 vs 88.6 h nmol/L. NT (fed state) showed a testosterone AUC increase of 45% between 120 and 200 mg, and NT 200 mg gave a similar mean AUC(0–10 h) to TU 80 mg: 87 vs 64.8 h nmol/L. Serum TU levels were variable and on a molar basis were ~ten-fold higher than serum testosterone levels after TU 80 mg fed. The DHT: testosterone AUC(0–10 h) ratio was more physiological for NT than TU being 0.19 vs 0.36. There were no emerging safety concerns with NT. CONCLUSION: This novel oral lipidic native testosterone formulation has potential advantages over oral TU of dosing independently of food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. Significance statement There is no licensed oral testosterone because of challenges in formulation, and the oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate, require a fatty meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone levels. We have overcome the design challenges and formulated an oral native testosterone that can be taken with or without food and provides physiological levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in hypogonadal men. This formulation, DITEST, has the potential advantage of being oral for patients who do not tolerate injections and less risk of adverse events that might theoretically be associated with elevated dihydrotestosterone levels. Future studies will need to define the dosing regimen for replacement in hypogonadal men. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8558846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85588462021-11-03 An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food Newell-Price, John Huatan, Hiep Quirke, Jo Porter, John Daniel, Eleni Mumdzic, Enis Voet, Bernard Keevil, Brian Whitaker, Martin J Ross, Richard J Eur J Endocrinol Clinical Study CONTEXT: There is no licensed oral native testosterone (NT) because of challenges in the formulation. Licensed oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. OBJECTIVE: To develop an oral NT formulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A lipid-based formulation of native testosterone filled into soft-gelatin capsules at 40 mg per capsule was designed with 2 years of stability at ambient temperature. Pharmacokinetic comparison studies of this oral lipidic NT formulation to oral TU were conducted in dogs and hypogonadal men. RESULTS: In dogs, 40 mg NT was well absorbed under fasted conditions whereas 40 mg TU required a high-fat meal: for NT, the mean fed/fasted AUC ratio was 1.63 and for TU 7.05. In hypogonadal men, fed and fasted NT had similar pharmacokinetics: C(max) mean 26.5 vs 30.4 nmol/L (769 vs 882 ng/dL), AUC(0–10 h) 87 vs 88.6 h nmol/L. NT (fed state) showed a testosterone AUC increase of 45% between 120 and 200 mg, and NT 200 mg gave a similar mean AUC(0–10 h) to TU 80 mg: 87 vs 64.8 h nmol/L. Serum TU levels were variable and on a molar basis were ~ten-fold higher than serum testosterone levels after TU 80 mg fed. The DHT: testosterone AUC(0–10 h) ratio was more physiological for NT than TU being 0.19 vs 0.36. There were no emerging safety concerns with NT. CONCLUSION: This novel oral lipidic native testosterone formulation has potential advantages over oral TU of dosing independently of food and a lower risk of supraphysiological DHT levels. Significance statement There is no licensed oral testosterone because of challenges in formulation, and the oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate, require a fatty meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone levels. We have overcome the design challenges and formulated an oral native testosterone that can be taken with or without food and provides physiological levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in hypogonadal men. This formulation, DITEST, has the potential advantage of being oral for patients who do not tolerate injections and less risk of adverse events that might theoretically be associated with elevated dihydrotestosterone levels. Future studies will need to define the dosing regimen for replacement in hypogonadal men. Bioscientifica Ltd 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8558846/ /pubmed/34379604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Newell-Price, John Huatan, Hiep Quirke, Jo Porter, John Daniel, Eleni Mumdzic, Enis Voet, Bernard Keevil, Brian Whitaker, Martin J Ross, Richard J An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title | An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title_full | An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title_fullStr | An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title_full_unstemmed | An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title_short | An oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
title_sort | oral lipidic native testosterone formulation that is absorbed independent of food |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34379604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newellpricejohn anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT huatanhiep anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT quirkejo anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT porterjohn anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT danieleleni anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT mumdzicenis anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT voetbernard anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT keevilbrian anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT whitakermartinj anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT rossrichardj anorallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT newellpricejohn orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT huatanhiep orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT quirkejo orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT porterjohn orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT danieleleni orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT mumdzicenis orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT voetbernard orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT keevilbrian orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT whitakermartinj orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood AT rossrichardj orallipidicnativetestosteroneformulationthatisabsorbedindependentoffood |