Cargando…

Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes

Objective  To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Anderson, Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros, de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira, Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de, Giordano, Vincenzo, Shimano, Antônio Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221
_version_ 1784592665697845248
author Freitas, Anderson
Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros
de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira
Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de
Giordano, Vincenzo
Shimano, Antônio Carlos
author_facet Freitas, Anderson
Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros
de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira
Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de
Giordano, Vincenzo
Shimano, Antônio Carlos
author_sort Freitas, Anderson
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different combined positions. Methods  In total, 25 synthetic bones were used, and they were divided into 4 groups: the control group (CG), with 10 models without perforation, and the test groups (A, B and C), with 5 models each. The test groups were fixed with cannulated screws using the Asnis technique, and they had the synthesis removed, and two of the holes formed by the reinforcement technique with PMMA were filled. The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the large trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. Results  All specimens of the CG and of groups A, B and C presented basal-cervical fracture of the femoral neck, except for a single model in group B, which presented a longitudinal fracture. An average of 5.4 mL of PMMA were used to reinforce the groups with filling. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey multiple comparison test, at the level of 5%, we observed that the CG presented significant differences in relation to groups A and C in the following parameters: maximum load, energy up to the fracture, and displacement. Conclusion  We observed that groups A and C, when compared to the CG, showed significant differences in the observation of displacement, maximum load, and energy until the fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85589252021-11-02 Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes Freitas, Anderson Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de Giordano, Vincenzo Shimano, Antônio Carlos Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different combined positions. Methods  In total, 25 synthetic bones were used, and they were divided into 4 groups: the control group (CG), with 10 models without perforation, and the test groups (A, B and C), with 5 models each. The test groups were fixed with cannulated screws using the Asnis technique, and they had the synthesis removed, and two of the holes formed by the reinforcement technique with PMMA were filled. The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the large trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. Results  All specimens of the CG and of groups A, B and C presented basal-cervical fracture of the femoral neck, except for a single model in group B, which presented a longitudinal fracture. An average of 5.4 mL of PMMA were used to reinforce the groups with filling. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey multiple comparison test, at the level of 5%, we observed that the CG presented significant differences in relation to groups A and C in the following parameters: maximum load, energy up to the fracture, and displacement. Conclusion  We observed that groups A and C, when compared to the CG, showed significant differences in the observation of displacement, maximum load, and energy until the fracture. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8558925/ /pubmed/34733437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Freitas, Anderson
Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros
de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira
Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de
Giordano, Vincenzo
Shimano, Antônio Carlos
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title_full Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title_fullStr Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title_short Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
title_sort mechanical analysis after proximal femoral reinforcement with polymethylmethacrylate in alternated double holes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221
work_keys_str_mv AT freitasanderson mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes
AT lessamarianademedeiros mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes
AT deoliveirasaulopereira mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes
AT oliveirapedrofelixpereirade mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes
AT giordanovincenzo mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes
AT shimanoantoniocarlos mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes