Cargando…
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
Objective To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in diff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221 |
_version_ | 1784592665697845248 |
---|---|
author | Freitas, Anderson Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de Giordano, Vincenzo Shimano, Antônio Carlos |
author_facet | Freitas, Anderson Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de Giordano, Vincenzo Shimano, Antônio Carlos |
author_sort | Freitas, Anderson |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different combined positions. Methods In total, 25 synthetic bones were used, and they were divided into 4 groups: the control group (CG), with 10 models without perforation, and the test groups (A, B and C), with 5 models each. The test groups were fixed with cannulated screws using the Asnis technique, and they had the synthesis removed, and two of the holes formed by the reinforcement technique with PMMA were filled. The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the large trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. Results All specimens of the CG and of groups A, B and C presented basal-cervical fracture of the femoral neck, except for a single model in group B, which presented a longitudinal fracture. An average of 5.4 mL of PMMA were used to reinforce the groups with filling. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey multiple comparison test, at the level of 5%, we observed that the CG presented significant differences in relation to groups A and C in the following parameters: maximum load, energy up to the fracture, and displacement. Conclusion We observed that groups A and C, when compared to the CG, showed significant differences in the observation of displacement, maximum load, and energy until the fracture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8558925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85589252021-11-02 Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes Freitas, Anderson Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de Giordano, Vincenzo Shimano, Antônio Carlos Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective To evaluate, through a biomechanical assay, the maximum load, energy, and displacement necessary for the occurrence of fractures in synthetic models of femurs after the removal of cannulated screws and the performance of a reinforcement technique with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different combined positions. Methods In total, 25 synthetic bones were used, and they were divided into 4 groups: the control group (CG), with 10 models without perforation, and the test groups (A, B and C), with 5 models each. The test groups were fixed with cannulated screws using the Asnis technique, and they had the synthesis removed, and two of the holes formed by the reinforcement technique with PMMA were filled. The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the large trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. Results All specimens of the CG and of groups A, B and C presented basal-cervical fracture of the femoral neck, except for a single model in group B, which presented a longitudinal fracture. An average of 5.4 mL of PMMA were used to reinforce the groups with filling. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey multiple comparison test, at the level of 5%, we observed that the CG presented significant differences in relation to groups A and C in the following parameters: maximum load, energy up to the fracture, and displacement. Conclusion We observed that groups A and C, when compared to the CG, showed significant differences in the observation of displacement, maximum load, and energy until the fracture. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8558925/ /pubmed/34733437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Freitas, Anderson Lessa, Mariana de Medeiros de Oliveira, Saulo Pereira Oliveira, Pedro Félix Pereira de Giordano, Vincenzo Shimano, Antônio Carlos Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes |
title |
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
|
title_full |
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
|
title_fullStr |
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
|
title_short |
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes
|
title_sort | mechanical analysis after proximal femoral reinforcement with polymethylmethacrylate in alternated double holes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freitasanderson mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes AT lessamarianademedeiros mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes AT deoliveirasaulopereira mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes AT oliveirapedrofelixpereirade mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes AT giordanovincenzo mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes AT shimanoantoniocarlos mechanicalanalysisafterproximalfemoralreinforcementwithpolymethylmethacrylateinalternateddoubleholes |