Cargando…

Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots

Introduction  Good hearing in pilots, including central auditory skills, is critical for flight safety and the prevention of aircraft accidents. Pure tone audiometry alone may not be enough to assess hearing in the members of this population who, in addition to high noise levels, routinely face spee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria, Durante, Alessandra Spada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718525
_version_ 1784592674830942208
author Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria
Durante, Alessandra Spada
author_facet Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria
Durante, Alessandra Spada
author_sort Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Good hearing in pilots, including central auditory skills, is critical for flight safety and the prevention of aircraft accidents. Pure tone audiometry alone may not be enough to assess hearing in the members of this population who, in addition to high noise levels, routinely face speech recognition tasks in non-ideal conditions. Objective  To characterize the frequency-following response (FFR) of a group of military pilots compared with a control group. Methods  Twenty military pilots in the Study Group and 20 non-pilot military personnel, not exposed to noise in their work, in the Control Group, all with normal hearing, aged between 30 and 40 years old, completed a questionnaire to assess their hearing habits, and their FFRs were measured with a /da/ syllable (duration 40 milliseconds, speed 10.9/s), at 80 dB NA in the right ear. All procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the institution. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests for quantitative variables, and the Fisher or chi-squared tests for qualitative variables, and a value of p  < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results  There was no significant difference between the groups regarding auditory habits. In the FFR, wave amplitudes A ( p  = 0.01) and C ( p  = 0.04) were significantly lower in the Study Group. Conclusion  Working as a military pilot can be a crucial factor in determining an individual's typical FFR pattern, demonstrated in the present study by statistically significant reductions in the amplitudes of the A and C waves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85589612021-11-03 Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria Durante, Alessandra Spada Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  Good hearing in pilots, including central auditory skills, is critical for flight safety and the prevention of aircraft accidents. Pure tone audiometry alone may not be enough to assess hearing in the members of this population who, in addition to high noise levels, routinely face speech recognition tasks in non-ideal conditions. Objective  To characterize the frequency-following response (FFR) of a group of military pilots compared with a control group. Methods  Twenty military pilots in the Study Group and 20 non-pilot military personnel, not exposed to noise in their work, in the Control Group, all with normal hearing, aged between 30 and 40 years old, completed a questionnaire to assess their hearing habits, and their FFRs were measured with a /da/ syllable (duration 40 milliseconds, speed 10.9/s), at 80 dB NA in the right ear. All procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the institution. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-Student or Mann-Whitney tests for quantitative variables, and the Fisher or chi-squared tests for qualitative variables, and a value of p  < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results  There was no significant difference between the groups regarding auditory habits. In the FFR, wave amplitudes A ( p  = 0.01) and C ( p  = 0.04) were significantly lower in the Study Group. Conclusion  Working as a military pilot can be a crucial factor in determining an individual's typical FFR pattern, demonstrated in the present study by statistically significant reductions in the amplitudes of the A and C waves. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8558961/ /pubmed/34737822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718525 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Martins-Moreira, Graziela Maria
Durante, Alessandra Spada
Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title_full Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title_fullStr Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title_full_unstemmed Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title_short Frequency-Following Response (FFR) in Military Pilots
title_sort frequency-following response (ffr) in military pilots
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718525
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsmoreiragrazielamaria frequencyfollowingresponseffrinmilitarypilots
AT durantealessandraspada frequencyfollowingresponseffrinmilitarypilots