Cargando…

A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive study of the structure and functions of the brain using neuroimaging techniques is increasingly being used for its clinical and research perspective. The morphological and volumetric changes in several regions and structures of brains are associated with the prognosis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Mahender Kumar, Singh, Krishna Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972753121990175
_version_ 1784592680289828864
author Singh, Mahender Kumar
Singh, Krishna Kumar
author_facet Singh, Mahender Kumar
Singh, Krishna Kumar
author_sort Singh, Mahender Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The noninvasive study of the structure and functions of the brain using neuroimaging techniques is increasingly being used for its clinical and research perspective. The morphological and volumetric changes in several regions and structures of brains are associated with the prognosis of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, schizophrenia, etc. and the early identification of such changes can have huge clinical significance. The accurate segmentation of three-dimensional brain magnetic resonance images into tissue types (i.e., grey matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid) and brain structures, thus, has huge importance as they can act as early biomarkers. The manual segmentation though considered the “gold standard” is time-consuming, subjective, and not suitable for bigger neuroimaging studies. Several automatic segmentation tools and algorithms have been developed over the years; the machine learning models particularly those using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture are increasingly being applied to improve the accuracy of automatic methods. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to understand the current and emerging state of automatic segmentation tools, their comparison, machine learning models, their reliability, and shortcomings with an intent to focus on the development of improved methods and algorithms. METHODS: The study focuses on the review of publicly available neuroimaging tools, their comparison, and emerging machine learning models particularly those based on CNN architecture developed and published during the last five years. CONCLUSION: Several software tools developed by various research groups and made publicly available for automatic segmentation of the brain show variability in their results in several comparison studies and have not attained the level of reliability required for clinical studies. The machine learning models particularly three dimensional fully convolutional network models can provide a robust and efficient alternative with relation to publicly available tools but perform poorly on unseen datasets. The challenges related to training, computation cost, reproducibility, and validation across distinct scanning modalities for machine learning models need to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8558983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85589832021-11-02 A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison Singh, Mahender Kumar Singh, Krishna Kumar Ann Neurosci Review Articles BACKGROUND: The noninvasive study of the structure and functions of the brain using neuroimaging techniques is increasingly being used for its clinical and research perspective. The morphological and volumetric changes in several regions and structures of brains are associated with the prognosis of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, schizophrenia, etc. and the early identification of such changes can have huge clinical significance. The accurate segmentation of three-dimensional brain magnetic resonance images into tissue types (i.e., grey matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid) and brain structures, thus, has huge importance as they can act as early biomarkers. The manual segmentation though considered the “gold standard” is time-consuming, subjective, and not suitable for bigger neuroimaging studies. Several automatic segmentation tools and algorithms have been developed over the years; the machine learning models particularly those using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture are increasingly being applied to improve the accuracy of automatic methods. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to understand the current and emerging state of automatic segmentation tools, their comparison, machine learning models, their reliability, and shortcomings with an intent to focus on the development of improved methods and algorithms. METHODS: The study focuses on the review of publicly available neuroimaging tools, their comparison, and emerging machine learning models particularly those based on CNN architecture developed and published during the last five years. CONCLUSION: Several software tools developed by various research groups and made publicly available for automatic segmentation of the brain show variability in their results in several comparison studies and have not attained the level of reliability required for clinical studies. The machine learning models particularly three dimensional fully convolutional network models can provide a robust and efficient alternative with relation to publicly available tools but perform poorly on unseen datasets. The challenges related to training, computation cost, reproducibility, and validation across distinct scanning modalities for machine learning models need to be addressed. SAGE Publications 2021-03-11 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8558983/ /pubmed/34733059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972753121990175 Text en © 2021 Indian Academy of Neurosciences (IAN) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Singh, Mahender Kumar
Singh, Krishna Kumar
A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title_full A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title_fullStr A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title_short A Review of Publicly Available Automatic Brain Segmentation Methodologies, Machine Learning Models, Recent Advancements, and Their Comparison
title_sort review of publicly available automatic brain segmentation methodologies, machine learning models, recent advancements, and their comparison
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972753121990175
work_keys_str_mv AT singhmahenderkumar areviewofpubliclyavailableautomaticbrainsegmentationmethodologiesmachinelearningmodelsrecentadvancementsandtheircomparison
AT singhkrishnakumar areviewofpubliclyavailableautomaticbrainsegmentationmethodologiesmachinelearningmodelsrecentadvancementsandtheircomparison
AT singhmahenderkumar reviewofpubliclyavailableautomaticbrainsegmentationmethodologiesmachinelearningmodelsrecentadvancementsandtheircomparison
AT singhkrishnakumar reviewofpubliclyavailableautomaticbrainsegmentationmethodologiesmachinelearningmodelsrecentadvancementsandtheircomparison