Cargando…

Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients

Background  The optimal management and the role of surgery in monomelic amyotrophy, also known as Hirayama disease (HD), remain controversial. In the largest series of patients with HD managed by cervical duraplasty (CD), this study compares the outcomes between conservative and surgical management....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakar, Sumit, Arun, Aditya Atal, Rajagopal, Niranjana, Aryan, Saritha, Mohan, Dilip, Vijayan, Joshy E., Hegde, Alangar S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735248
_version_ 1784592682692116480
author Thakar, Sumit
Arun, Aditya Atal
Rajagopal, Niranjana
Aryan, Saritha
Mohan, Dilip
Vijayan, Joshy E.
Hegde, Alangar S.
author_facet Thakar, Sumit
Arun, Aditya Atal
Rajagopal, Niranjana
Aryan, Saritha
Mohan, Dilip
Vijayan, Joshy E.
Hegde, Alangar S.
author_sort Thakar, Sumit
collection PubMed
description Background  The optimal management and the role of surgery in monomelic amyotrophy, also known as Hirayama disease (HD), remain controversial. In the largest series of patients with HD managed by cervical duraplasty (CD), this study compares the outcomes between conservative and surgical management. Methods  A retrospective case–control study was performed on 60 patients with HD. The cases consisted of 30 patients who underwent CD, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls who managed with long-term collar wear. Clinical improvement was recorded using two patient-reported outcome measures—the Odom's scale and a self-rated hand grip strength score. Median and ulnar compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes and various magnetic resonance imaging parameters were recorded. Results  None of the controls experienced clinical improvement at follow-up; 90% remained status quo at 24.33 ± 9.38 months. Seventy-six percent of the operated patients demonstrated clinical improvement at 29.61 ± 12.78 months, and a majority of them reported moderately better grip strength. The preoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the surgical group improved from 0.74 ± 0.13 to 0.86 ± 0.21 ( p  = 0.01), and the cord demonstrated a significant decrease in forward migration on flexion (0.20 ± 0.11 and 0.03 ± 0.07 preoperatively and at follow-up, respectively, p  < 0.0001). Patients with clinical improvement demonstrated significantly better mean APD and median and ulnar CMAP values than those who did not improve ( p  < 0.0001). The mean cervical alignment did not change significantly at follow-up ( p  = 0.13). Conclusions  This study shows that CD can significantly alter the clinical course of patients with progressive symptoms of HD. This approach successfully arrests the forward migration of the cervical cord on flexion and promotes morphological recovery of the cord. A majority of the patients undergoing CD demonstrate clinical and electrophysiological improvement at mid-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85590612021-11-03 Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients Thakar, Sumit Arun, Aditya Atal Rajagopal, Niranjana Aryan, Saritha Mohan, Dilip Vijayan, Joshy E. Hegde, Alangar S. J Neurosci Rural Pract Background  The optimal management and the role of surgery in monomelic amyotrophy, also known as Hirayama disease (HD), remain controversial. In the largest series of patients with HD managed by cervical duraplasty (CD), this study compares the outcomes between conservative and surgical management. Methods  A retrospective case–control study was performed on 60 patients with HD. The cases consisted of 30 patients who underwent CD, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls who managed with long-term collar wear. Clinical improvement was recorded using two patient-reported outcome measures—the Odom's scale and a self-rated hand grip strength score. Median and ulnar compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes and various magnetic resonance imaging parameters were recorded. Results  None of the controls experienced clinical improvement at follow-up; 90% remained status quo at 24.33 ± 9.38 months. Seventy-six percent of the operated patients demonstrated clinical improvement at 29.61 ± 12.78 months, and a majority of them reported moderately better grip strength. The preoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the surgical group improved from 0.74 ± 0.13 to 0.86 ± 0.21 ( p  = 0.01), and the cord demonstrated a significant decrease in forward migration on flexion (0.20 ± 0.11 and 0.03 ± 0.07 preoperatively and at follow-up, respectively, p  < 0.0001). Patients with clinical improvement demonstrated significantly better mean APD and median and ulnar CMAP values than those who did not improve ( p  < 0.0001). The mean cervical alignment did not change significantly at follow-up ( p  = 0.13). Conclusions  This study shows that CD can significantly alter the clinical course of patients with progressive symptoms of HD. This approach successfully arrests the forward migration of the cervical cord on flexion and promotes morphological recovery of the cord. A majority of the patients undergoing CD demonstrate clinical and electrophysiological improvement at mid-term follow-up. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8559061/ /pubmed/34737497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735248 Text en Association for Helping Neurosurgical Sick People. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thakar, Sumit
Arun, Aditya Atal
Rajagopal, Niranjana
Aryan, Saritha
Mohan, Dilip
Vijayan, Joshy E.
Hegde, Alangar S.
Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title_full Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title_fullStr Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title_short Outcomes after Cervical Duraplasty for Monomelic Amyotrophy (Hirayama Disease): Results of a Case–Control Study of 60 Patients
title_sort outcomes after cervical duraplasty for monomelic amyotrophy (hirayama disease): results of a case–control study of 60 patients
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735248
work_keys_str_mv AT thakarsumit outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT arunadityaatal outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT rajagopalniranjana outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT aryansaritha outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT mohandilip outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT vijayanjoshye outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients
AT hegdealangars outcomesaftercervicalduraplastyformonomelicamyotrophyhirayamadiseaseresultsofacasecontrolstudyof60patients