Cargando…
Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study
Objective To evaluate awareness and response to stroke among the general public. Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational study, self-reported stroke awareness questionnaire was administered in 2000 consecutive participants who visited outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735822 |
_version_ | 1784592688276832256 |
---|---|
author | Sirisha, Sai Jala, Sireesha Vooturi, Sudhindra Yada, Praveen Kumar Kaul, Subhash |
author_facet | Sirisha, Sai Jala, Sireesha Vooturi, Sudhindra Yada, Praveen Kumar Kaul, Subhash |
author_sort | Sirisha, Sai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate awareness and response to stroke among the general public. Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational study, self-reported stroke awareness questionnaire was administered in 2000 consecutive participants who visited outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. For data analysis, comparison included for awareness of stroke and response in case of stroke. Results The average age of the study participants was 39.64 ± 15.55 (17–85), with 651(32.6%) women. Among the respondents, 786(39.3%) participants mentioned stroke as blood clot in the brain; 268(13.4%) stated it as brain hemorrhage. Awareness of stroke was higher in people in cities (71.0 vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) and graduates (75.3 vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001) or knew a family member or friend who had stroke (42.7 vs. 30.4%; p < 0.001). Most commonly recognized risk factors included stress (1,152; 57.6%) and hypertension (1,148; 57.4%). Most identified warning sign was weakness of one side of body (807; 40.4%) and speech impairment (658; 32.9%). Participants who were aware of stroke knew a greater number of risk factors (3.75 ± 2.88 vs. 2.45 ± 2.66; p < 0.001) and warning signs (2.85 ± 2.25 vs. 1.49 ± 1.41; p <0.001). Among 1,138 participants who were aware of stroke, 166 (14.6%) participants knew one correct response in case of a stroke, either call a doctor (49.3 vs. 35.0%; p <0.001) or call an ambulance (41.1 vs. 34.9%; p = 0.055). Participants who knew one correct response to stroke had at least a family member/friend who had stroke (44.1 vs. 34.3%; p < 0.022). Conclusion We report that among 56.9% of the participants who were aware of stroke most could not name more than four risk factors or three warning signs of stroke. Only 14.6% of those aware of stroke knew appropriate response to stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8559085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85590852021-11-03 Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study Sirisha, Sai Jala, Sireesha Vooturi, Sudhindra Yada, Praveen Kumar Kaul, Subhash J Neurosci Rural Pract Objective To evaluate awareness and response to stroke among the general public. Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational study, self-reported stroke awareness questionnaire was administered in 2000 consecutive participants who visited outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. For data analysis, comparison included for awareness of stroke and response in case of stroke. Results The average age of the study participants was 39.64 ± 15.55 (17–85), with 651(32.6%) women. Among the respondents, 786(39.3%) participants mentioned stroke as blood clot in the brain; 268(13.4%) stated it as brain hemorrhage. Awareness of stroke was higher in people in cities (71.0 vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) and graduates (75.3 vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001) or knew a family member or friend who had stroke (42.7 vs. 30.4%; p < 0.001). Most commonly recognized risk factors included stress (1,152; 57.6%) and hypertension (1,148; 57.4%). Most identified warning sign was weakness of one side of body (807; 40.4%) and speech impairment (658; 32.9%). Participants who were aware of stroke knew a greater number of risk factors (3.75 ± 2.88 vs. 2.45 ± 2.66; p < 0.001) and warning signs (2.85 ± 2.25 vs. 1.49 ± 1.41; p <0.001). Among 1,138 participants who were aware of stroke, 166 (14.6%) participants knew one correct response in case of a stroke, either call a doctor (49.3 vs. 35.0%; p <0.001) or call an ambulance (41.1 vs. 34.9%; p = 0.055). Participants who knew one correct response to stroke had at least a family member/friend who had stroke (44.1 vs. 34.3%; p < 0.022). Conclusion We report that among 56.9% of the participants who were aware of stroke most could not name more than four risk factors or three warning signs of stroke. Only 14.6% of those aware of stroke knew appropriate response to stroke. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8559085/ /pubmed/34737504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735822 Text en Association for Helping Neurosurgical Sick People. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sirisha, Sai Jala, Sireesha Vooturi, Sudhindra Yada, Praveen Kumar Kaul, Subhash Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title | Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title_full | Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title_short | Awareness, Recognition, and Response to Stroke among the General Public—An Observational Study |
title_sort | awareness, recognition, and response to stroke among the general public—an observational study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735822 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sirishasai awarenessrecognitionandresponsetostrokeamongthegeneralpublicanobservationalstudy AT jalasireesha awarenessrecognitionandresponsetostrokeamongthegeneralpublicanobservationalstudy AT vooturisudhindra awarenessrecognitionandresponsetostrokeamongthegeneralpublicanobservationalstudy AT yadapraveenkumar awarenessrecognitionandresponsetostrokeamongthegeneralpublicanobservationalstudy AT kaulsubhash awarenessrecognitionandresponsetostrokeamongthegeneralpublicanobservationalstudy |