Cargando…

Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military

OBJECTIVES: Many workers in high-risk occupations, such as soldiers, are exposed to stressors at work, increasing their risk of developing mental health conditions and substance abuse (MHC/SA). Disclosure can lead to both positive (eg, support) and negative (eg, discrimination) work outcomes, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogaers, Rebecca, Geuze, Elbert, van Weeghel, Jaap, Leijten, Fenna, Rüsch, Nicolas, van de Mheen, Dike, Varis, Piia, Rozema, Andrea, Brouwers, Evelien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049370
_version_ 1784592692657782784
author Bogaers, Rebecca
Geuze, Elbert
van Weeghel, Jaap
Leijten, Fenna
Rüsch, Nicolas
van de Mheen, Dike
Varis, Piia
Rozema, Andrea
Brouwers, Evelien
author_facet Bogaers, Rebecca
Geuze, Elbert
van Weeghel, Jaap
Leijten, Fenna
Rüsch, Nicolas
van de Mheen, Dike
Varis, Piia
Rozema, Andrea
Brouwers, Evelien
author_sort Bogaers, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many workers in high-risk occupations, such as soldiers, are exposed to stressors at work, increasing their risk of developing mental health conditions and substance abuse (MHC/SA). Disclosure can lead to both positive (eg, support) and negative (eg, discrimination) work outcomes, and therefore, both disclosure and non-disclosure can affect health, well-being and sustainable employment, making it a complex dilemma. The objective is to study barriers to and facilitators for disclosure in the military from multiple perspectives. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups with soldiers with and without MHC/SA and military mental health professionals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was done using a general inductive approach. SETTING: The study took place within the Dutch military. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 46 people participated in 8 homogeneous focus groups, including 3 perspectives: soldiers with MHC/SA (N=20), soldiers without MHC/SA (N=10) and military mental health professionals (N=16). RESULTS: Five barriers for disclosure were identified (fear of career consequences, fear of social rejection, lack of leadership support, lack of skills to talk about MHC/SA, masculine workplace culture) and three facilitators (anticipated positive consequences of disclosure, leadership support, work-related MHC/SA). Views of the stakeholder groups were highly congruent. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all barriers (and facilitators) were related to fear for stigma and discrimination. This was acknowledged by all three perspectives, suggesting that stigma and discrimination are considerable barriers to sustainable employment and well-being. Supervisor knowledge, attitudes and behaviour were critical for disclosure, and supervisors thus have a key role in improving health, well-being and sustainable employment for soldiers with MHC/SA. Furthermore, adjustments could be made by the military on a policy level, to take away some of the fears that soldiers have when disclosing MHC/SA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85591082021-11-04 Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military Bogaers, Rebecca Geuze, Elbert van Weeghel, Jaap Leijten, Fenna Rüsch, Nicolas van de Mheen, Dike Varis, Piia Rozema, Andrea Brouwers, Evelien BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Many workers in high-risk occupations, such as soldiers, are exposed to stressors at work, increasing their risk of developing mental health conditions and substance abuse (MHC/SA). Disclosure can lead to both positive (eg, support) and negative (eg, discrimination) work outcomes, and therefore, both disclosure and non-disclosure can affect health, well-being and sustainable employment, making it a complex dilemma. The objective is to study barriers to and facilitators for disclosure in the military from multiple perspectives. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups with soldiers with and without MHC/SA and military mental health professionals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was done using a general inductive approach. SETTING: The study took place within the Dutch military. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 46 people participated in 8 homogeneous focus groups, including 3 perspectives: soldiers with MHC/SA (N=20), soldiers without MHC/SA (N=10) and military mental health professionals (N=16). RESULTS: Five barriers for disclosure were identified (fear of career consequences, fear of social rejection, lack of leadership support, lack of skills to talk about MHC/SA, masculine workplace culture) and three facilitators (anticipated positive consequences of disclosure, leadership support, work-related MHC/SA). Views of the stakeholder groups were highly congruent. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all barriers (and facilitators) were related to fear for stigma and discrimination. This was acknowledged by all three perspectives, suggesting that stigma and discrimination are considerable barriers to sustainable employment and well-being. Supervisor knowledge, attitudes and behaviour were critical for disclosure, and supervisors thus have a key role in improving health, well-being and sustainable employment for soldiers with MHC/SA. Furthermore, adjustments could be made by the military on a policy level, to take away some of the fears that soldiers have when disclosing MHC/SA. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8559108/ /pubmed/34706950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049370 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Bogaers, Rebecca
Geuze, Elbert
van Weeghel, Jaap
Leijten, Fenna
Rüsch, Nicolas
van de Mheen, Dike
Varis, Piia
Rozema, Andrea
Brouwers, Evelien
Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title_full Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title_fullStr Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title_full_unstemmed Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title_short Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
title_sort decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049370
work_keys_str_mv AT bogaersrebecca decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT geuzeelbert decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT vanweegheljaap decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT leijtenfenna decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT ruschnicolas decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT vandemheendike decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT varispiia decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT rozemaandrea decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary
AT brouwersevelien decisionnottodisclosementalhealthconditionsorsubstanceabuseintheworkenvironmentamultiperspectivefocusgroupstudywithinthemilitary