Cargando…

Effect of 2% Hyaluronic Acid on the Rate of Healing of Corneal Epithelial Defect After Pterygium Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the effects of 2% hyaluronic acid (HA) on corneal epithelial defect after pterygium surgery in comparison with the control group, measured in terms of the healing rate of corneal epithelial defect and pain score after surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaidaroon, Winai, Satayawut, Narudom, Tananuvat, Napaporn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737549
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S336372
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the effects of 2% hyaluronic acid (HA) on corneal epithelial defect after pterygium surgery in comparison with the control group, measured in terms of the healing rate of corneal epithelial defect and pain score after surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, fifty patients with primary pterygium were randomized into 2 groups: a control group or the group treated with a single topical application of 2% HA. Comprehensive ophthalmological examinations included measuring the area of corneal epithelium defect using ImageJ freeware and the pain score assessment after the operation. RESULTS: The mean and SD of the area of epithelial defect measured on postoperative Day 0, 1, and 2 were 10.89 ± 1.33 mm(2), 5.04 ± 0.87mm(2), and 2.44 ± 0.74 mm(2) for the HA group, and 11.14 ± 1.11 mm(2), 7.74 ± 1.17 mm(2), and 5.31 ± 1.15 mm(2) for the control group, respectively. While the initial area of the defect on Day 0 was essentially the same for both groups (p = 0.478), the area of the defect in the HA group was significantly smaller on both Day 1 and Day 2 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the HA group exhibited a statistically significant higher rate of healing for the cornea epithelial defect over Day 0 and 1 compared to the control group (5.85 ± 0.89 mm(2)/day vs 3.14 ± 1.28 mm(2)/day, p < 0.001), respectively. The median (range) pain scores were evaluated at Day 0 was 7 (4–10) in the HA group and 7 (3–10) in the control group (p = 0.953). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05) for Days 1, 2, and 3. CONCLUSION: A single topical application of 2% HA tended to accelerate the healing process of corneal epithelium defect after pterygium surgery without any observable adverse effects during short-term follow-up.