Cargando…

A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal leiomyomas are one of the most common benign oesophageal tumours. This retrospective, observational study summarized and compared the clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma between single-lumen endotracheal intubation with a bronchial blocker...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Luo, Zhang, Xue, Gao, Chao, He, Jia, Han, Zhijun, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34719379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01707-4
_version_ 1784592748993576960
author Zhao, Luo
Zhang, Xue
Gao, Chao
He, Jia
Han, Zhijun
Li, Li
author_facet Zhao, Luo
Zhang, Xue
Gao, Chao
He, Jia
Han, Zhijun
Li, Li
author_sort Zhao, Luo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oesophageal leiomyomas are one of the most common benign oesophageal tumours. This retrospective, observational study summarized and compared the clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma between single-lumen endotracheal intubation with a bronchial blocker and double-lumen endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A total of 36 patients who underwent thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Fifteen patients received single-lumen endotracheal intubation combined with a right bronchial blocker (SLT-B group), and twenty-one patients received double-lumen endotracheal intubation (DLT group). Clinical data, surgical variables, and postoperative complications were analysed and compared. RESULTS: The average tumour size in all patients was 4.3 ± 2.0 cm. The average tumour size among symptomatic patients was significantly larger than that among asymptomatic patients (5.1 ± 2.0 cm vs 3.7 ± 1.7 cm, P < 0.05). Patients in the SLT-B group had a significantly larger average tumour size than patients in the DLT group (5.4 ± 2.1 cm vs 3.5 ± 1.4 cm, P < 0.05). The SLT-B group had a significantly shorter operation time and shorter total hospital stay than the DLT group. No mucosal injury, conversion to thoracotomy, or other operative complications occurred in the SLT-B group. In the follow-up, no recurrence, dysphagia, or regurgitation was found in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional double-lumen intubation, artificial pneumothorax-assisted single-lumen endotracheal intubation combined with a bronchial blocker for thoracoscopic oesophageal leiomyoma enucleation can achieve complete removal of larger tumours, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85593832021-11-03 A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma Zhao, Luo Zhang, Xue Gao, Chao He, Jia Han, Zhijun Li, Li J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Oesophageal leiomyomas are one of the most common benign oesophageal tumours. This retrospective, observational study summarized and compared the clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma between single-lumen endotracheal intubation with a bronchial blocker and double-lumen endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A total of 36 patients who underwent thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Fifteen patients received single-lumen endotracheal intubation combined with a right bronchial blocker (SLT-B group), and twenty-one patients received double-lumen endotracheal intubation (DLT group). Clinical data, surgical variables, and postoperative complications were analysed and compared. RESULTS: The average tumour size in all patients was 4.3 ± 2.0 cm. The average tumour size among symptomatic patients was significantly larger than that among asymptomatic patients (5.1 ± 2.0 cm vs 3.7 ± 1.7 cm, P < 0.05). Patients in the SLT-B group had a significantly larger average tumour size than patients in the DLT group (5.4 ± 2.1 cm vs 3.5 ± 1.4 cm, P < 0.05). The SLT-B group had a significantly shorter operation time and shorter total hospital stay than the DLT group. No mucosal injury, conversion to thoracotomy, or other operative complications occurred in the SLT-B group. In the follow-up, no recurrence, dysphagia, or regurgitation was found in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional double-lumen intubation, artificial pneumothorax-assisted single-lumen endotracheal intubation combined with a bronchial blocker for thoracoscopic oesophageal leiomyoma enucleation can achieve complete removal of larger tumours, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. BioMed Central 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8559383/ /pubmed/34719379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01707-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Luo
Zhang, Xue
Gao, Chao
He, Jia
Han, Zhijun
Li, Li
A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title_full A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title_fullStr A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title_short A comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
title_sort comparison of bronchial blocker under artificial pneumothorax and double-lumen endobronchial tube for lung isolation in thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34719379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01707-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoluo acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT zhangxue acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT gaochao acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT hejia acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT hanzhijun acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT lili acomparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT zhaoluo comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT zhangxue comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT gaochao comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT hejia comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT hanzhijun comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma
AT lili comparisonofbronchialblockerunderartificialpneumothoraxanddoublelumenendobronchialtubeforlungisolationinthoracoscopicenucleationofoesophagealleiomyoma