Cargando…

Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis

BACKGROUND: In several reports, gastric cancer nomograms for predicting overall or disease‐specific survival have been described. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the attractiveness of disease‐specific mortality (DSM) as an endpoint of risk model. This study aimed to develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bando, Etsuro, Ji, Xinge, Kattan, Michael W., Bencivenga, Maria, de Manzoni, Giovanni, Terashima, Masanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4279
_version_ 1784592765742481408
author Bando, Etsuro
Ji, Xinge
Kattan, Michael W.
Bencivenga, Maria
de Manzoni, Giovanni
Terashima, Masanori
author_facet Bando, Etsuro
Ji, Xinge
Kattan, Michael W.
Bencivenga, Maria
de Manzoni, Giovanni
Terashima, Masanori
author_sort Bando, Etsuro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In several reports, gastric cancer nomograms for predicting overall or disease‐specific survival have been described. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the attractiveness of disease‐specific mortality (DSM) as an endpoint of risk model. This study aimed to develop the first pretreatment gastric cancer nomogram for predicting DSM that considers competing risks (CRs). METHODS: The prediction model was developed using data for 5231 gastric cancer patients. Fifteen prognosticators, which were registered at diagnosis, were evaluated. The nomogram for DSM was created as visualizations of the multivariable Fine and Gray regression model. An independent cohort for external validation consisted of 389 gastric cancer patients from a different institution. The performance of the model was assessed by discrimination (Harrell's concordance (C)‐index), calibration, and decision curve analysis. DSM and CRs were evaluated, paying special attention to host‐related factors such as age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), by using Gray's univariable method. RESULTS: Fourteen prognostic factors were selected to develop the nomogram. The new nomogram for DSM exhibited good discrimination. Its C‐index of 0.887 surpassed that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical staging (0.794). The C‐index was 0.713 (AJCC, 0.582) for the external validation cohort. The nomogram showed good performance internally and externally, in the calibration and decision curve analysis. Host‐related factors including age and ECOG PS, were strongly correlated with competing risks. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed nomogram accurately predicts DSM, which can be used for patient counseling in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85594612021-11-08 Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis Bando, Etsuro Ji, Xinge Kattan, Michael W. Bencivenga, Maria de Manzoni, Giovanni Terashima, Masanori Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: In several reports, gastric cancer nomograms for predicting overall or disease‐specific survival have been described. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the attractiveness of disease‐specific mortality (DSM) as an endpoint of risk model. This study aimed to develop the first pretreatment gastric cancer nomogram for predicting DSM that considers competing risks (CRs). METHODS: The prediction model was developed using data for 5231 gastric cancer patients. Fifteen prognosticators, which were registered at diagnosis, were evaluated. The nomogram for DSM was created as visualizations of the multivariable Fine and Gray regression model. An independent cohort for external validation consisted of 389 gastric cancer patients from a different institution. The performance of the model was assessed by discrimination (Harrell's concordance (C)‐index), calibration, and decision curve analysis. DSM and CRs were evaluated, paying special attention to host‐related factors such as age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), by using Gray's univariable method. RESULTS: Fourteen prognostic factors were selected to develop the nomogram. The new nomogram for DSM exhibited good discrimination. Its C‐index of 0.887 surpassed that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical staging (0.794). The C‐index was 0.713 (AJCC, 0.582) for the external validation cohort. The nomogram showed good performance internally and externally, in the calibration and decision curve analysis. Host‐related factors including age and ECOG PS, were strongly correlated with competing risks. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed nomogram accurately predicts DSM, which can be used for patient counseling in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8559461/ /pubmed/34628732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4279 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Bando, Etsuro
Ji, Xinge
Kattan, Michael W.
Bencivenga, Maria
de Manzoni, Giovanni
Terashima, Masanori
Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title_full Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title_fullStr Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title_short Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐A competing risk analysis
title_sort development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease‐specific mortality in gastric cancer‐a competing risk analysis
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4279
work_keys_str_mv AT bandoetsuro developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis
AT jixinge developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis
AT kattanmichaelw developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis
AT bencivengamaria developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis
AT demanzonigiovanni developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis
AT terashimamasanori developmentandvalidationofpretreatmentnomogramfordiseasespecificmortalityingastriccanceracompetingriskanalysis