Cargando…

Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort

BACKGROUND: To study the risk factors of Gleason score upgrading (GSU) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a Chinese cohort. METHODS: The data of 637 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and RP in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The age, body mass inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Baoling, Wu, Shangrong, Zhang, Yang, Guo, Mingyu, Liu, Ranlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4274
_version_ 1784592768170983424
author Zhang, Baoling
Wu, Shangrong
Zhang, Yang
Guo, Mingyu
Liu, Ranlu
author_facet Zhang, Baoling
Wu, Shangrong
Zhang, Yang
Guo, Mingyu
Liu, Ranlu
author_sort Zhang, Baoling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study the risk factors of Gleason score upgrading (GSU) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a Chinese cohort. METHODS: The data of 637 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and RP in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The age, body mass index (BMI), prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level, testosterone (TT) level, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), eosinophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (ELR), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine transaminase (AST/ALT) ratio, clinical stage, the biopsy method, and pathological characteristics of specimens after biopsy and RP were collected for all patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of GSU after RP. The predictive efficacy was verified with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We performed the analysis separately in the overall cohort and in the cohort with Gleason score (GS) = 6. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 177 patients (27.79%) had GSU, and in the GS = 6 cohort, 68 patients (60.18%) had GSU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in the overall cohort, clinical stage ≥T2c (OR = 3.201, p < 0.001), the number of positive cores ≥3 (OR = 0.435, p = 0.04), and positive rate of biopsy (OR = 0.990, p = 0.016) can affect whether GS is upgraded, and the AUC of the combination of the three indicators for predicting the occurrence of GSU was 0.627. In the GS = 6 cohort, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that clinical stage ≥T2c (OR = 4.690, p = 0.001) was a risk factor for GSU, and the AUC predicted to occur GSU is 0.675. CONCLUSION: Clinical stage ≥T2c, the number of positive cores <3, and lower positive rate of biopsy are the risk factors of GSU. This study may provide some references for clinicians to judge the accuracy of biopsy pathological grading and formulate treatment strategies, but the specific effect still needs clinical practice certification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85594712021-11-08 Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort Zhang, Baoling Wu, Shangrong Zhang, Yang Guo, Mingyu Liu, Ranlu Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: To study the risk factors of Gleason score upgrading (GSU) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a Chinese cohort. METHODS: The data of 637 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and RP in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The age, body mass index (BMI), prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level, testosterone (TT) level, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), eosinophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (ELR), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine transaminase (AST/ALT) ratio, clinical stage, the biopsy method, and pathological characteristics of specimens after biopsy and RP were collected for all patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of GSU after RP. The predictive efficacy was verified with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We performed the analysis separately in the overall cohort and in the cohort with Gleason score (GS) = 6. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 177 patients (27.79%) had GSU, and in the GS = 6 cohort, 68 patients (60.18%) had GSU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in the overall cohort, clinical stage ≥T2c (OR = 3.201, p < 0.001), the number of positive cores ≥3 (OR = 0.435, p = 0.04), and positive rate of biopsy (OR = 0.990, p = 0.016) can affect whether GS is upgraded, and the AUC of the combination of the three indicators for predicting the occurrence of GSU was 0.627. In the GS = 6 cohort, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that clinical stage ≥T2c (OR = 4.690, p = 0.001) was a risk factor for GSU, and the AUC predicted to occur GSU is 0.675. CONCLUSION: Clinical stage ≥T2c, the number of positive cores <3, and lower positive rate of biopsy are the risk factors of GSU. This study may provide some references for clinicians to judge the accuracy of biopsy pathological grading and formulate treatment strategies, but the specific effect still needs clinical practice certification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8559471/ /pubmed/34528767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4274 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Zhang, Baoling
Wu, Shangrong
Zhang, Yang
Guo, Mingyu
Liu, Ranlu
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title_full Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title_fullStr Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title_short Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
title_sort analysis of risk factors for gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a chinese cohort
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34528767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4274
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbaoling analysisofriskfactorsforgleasonscoreupgradingafterradicalprostatectomyinachinesecohort
AT wushangrong analysisofriskfactorsforgleasonscoreupgradingafterradicalprostatectomyinachinesecohort
AT zhangyang analysisofriskfactorsforgleasonscoreupgradingafterradicalprostatectomyinachinesecohort
AT guomingyu analysisofriskfactorsforgleasonscoreupgradingafterradicalprostatectomyinachinesecohort
AT liuranlu analysisofriskfactorsforgleasonscoreupgradingafterradicalprostatectomyinachinesecohort