Cargando…

Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy

BACKGROUND: It is well established that cancer patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are at particularly elevated risk of adverse outcomes, but the comparison of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection risk between cancer patients and cancer‐free individuals has been poorly investigated on a population‐basis. METHODS: A p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serraino, Diego, Zucchetto, Antonella, Dal Maso, Luigino, Del Zotto, Stefania, Taboga, Francesca, Clagnan, Elena, Fratino, Lucia, Tosolini, Francesca, Burba, Ivana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4271
_version_ 1784592774940590080
author Serraino, Diego
Zucchetto, Antonella
Dal Maso, Luigino
Del Zotto, Stefania
Taboga, Francesca
Clagnan, Elena
Fratino, Lucia
Tosolini, Francesca
Burba, Ivana
author_facet Serraino, Diego
Zucchetto, Antonella
Dal Maso, Luigino
Del Zotto, Stefania
Taboga, Francesca
Clagnan, Elena
Fratino, Lucia
Tosolini, Francesca
Burba, Ivana
author_sort Serraino, Diego
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well established that cancer patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are at particularly elevated risk of adverse outcomes, but the comparison of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection risk between cancer patients and cancer‐free individuals has been poorly investigated on a population‐basis. METHODS: A population‐based study was thus conducted in Friuli Venezia Giulia region, northeastern Italy, to estimate prevalence and determinants of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection among cancer patients, as compared to cancer‐free individuals, and to evaluate adverse outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The study included 263,042 individuals tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 in February–December 2020 with cancer history retrieved through the regional cancer registry. Odds ratios (ORs) of SARS‐CoV‐2 positivity, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sex and age. Hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for sex and age for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and all‐cause death were estimated using Cox models. RESULTS: Among 26,394 cancer patients tested for SARS‐CoV‐2, the prevalence of infection was 11.7% versus 16.2% among 236,648 cancer‐free individuals, with a corresponding OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57–0.62). The prevalence was much higher (29% in both groups) during the second pandemic wave (October–December 2020). Among cancer patients, age ≥80 years and cancer diagnosis ≥13 months before SARS‐CoV‐2 testing were the major risk factors of infection. Among 3098 infected cancer patients, the fatality rate was 17.4% versus 15.8% among 23,296 negative ones (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.49–1.78), and versus 5.0% among 38,268 infected cancer‐free individuals (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12–1.36). No significant differences emerged when considering ICU admission risk. CONCLUSION: Albeit cancer patients reported reduced SARS‐CoV‐2 infection risk, those infected showed higher mortality than uninfected ones and infected cancer‐free population. Study findings claim for continuing to protect cancer patients from SARS‐CoV‐2, without reducing the level of oncologic care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85594992021-11-08 Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy Serraino, Diego Zucchetto, Antonella Dal Maso, Luigino Del Zotto, Stefania Taboga, Francesca Clagnan, Elena Fratino, Lucia Tosolini, Francesca Burba, Ivana Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: It is well established that cancer patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are at particularly elevated risk of adverse outcomes, but the comparison of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection risk between cancer patients and cancer‐free individuals has been poorly investigated on a population‐basis. METHODS: A population‐based study was thus conducted in Friuli Venezia Giulia region, northeastern Italy, to estimate prevalence and determinants of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection among cancer patients, as compared to cancer‐free individuals, and to evaluate adverse outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The study included 263,042 individuals tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 in February–December 2020 with cancer history retrieved through the regional cancer registry. Odds ratios (ORs) of SARS‐CoV‐2 positivity, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sex and age. Hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for sex and age for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and all‐cause death were estimated using Cox models. RESULTS: Among 26,394 cancer patients tested for SARS‐CoV‐2, the prevalence of infection was 11.7% versus 16.2% among 236,648 cancer‐free individuals, with a corresponding OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57–0.62). The prevalence was much higher (29% in both groups) during the second pandemic wave (October–December 2020). Among cancer patients, age ≥80 years and cancer diagnosis ≥13 months before SARS‐CoV‐2 testing were the major risk factors of infection. Among 3098 infected cancer patients, the fatality rate was 17.4% versus 15.8% among 23,296 negative ones (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.49–1.78), and versus 5.0% among 38,268 infected cancer‐free individuals (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12–1.36). No significant differences emerged when considering ICU admission risk. CONCLUSION: Albeit cancer patients reported reduced SARS‐CoV‐2 infection risk, those infected showed higher mortality than uninfected ones and infected cancer‐free population. Study findings claim for continuing to protect cancer patients from SARS‐CoV‐2, without reducing the level of oncologic care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8559499/ /pubmed/34551210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4271 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Serraino, Diego
Zucchetto, Antonella
Dal Maso, Luigino
Del Zotto, Stefania
Taboga, Francesca
Clagnan, Elena
Fratino, Lucia
Tosolini, Francesca
Burba, Ivana
Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title_full Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title_fullStr Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title_short Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of SARS‐COV‐2 infection among cancer patients. A population‐based study in northern Italy
title_sort prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of sars‐cov‐2 infection among cancer patients. a population‐based study in northern italy
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4271
work_keys_str_mv AT serrainodiego prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT zucchettoantonella prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT dalmasoluigino prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT delzottostefania prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT tabogafrancesca prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT clagnanelena prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT fratinolucia prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT tosolinifrancesca prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly
AT burbaivana prevalencedeterminantsandoutcomesofsarscov2infectionamongcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyinnorthernitaly