Cargando…

Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint react...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goetti, Patrick, Denard, Patrick J., Collin, Philippe, Ibrahim, Mohamed, Mazzolari, Adrien, Lädermann, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014
_version_ 1784592784812933120
author Goetti, Patrick
Denard, Patrick J.
Collin, Philippe
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Mazzolari, Adrien
Lädermann, Alexandre
author_facet Goetti, Patrick
Denard, Patrick J.
Collin, Philippe
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Mazzolari, Adrien
Lädermann, Alexandre
author_sort Goetti, Patrick
collection PubMed
description The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening. The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis. The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont’s reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm. More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85595682021-11-09 Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Goetti, Patrick Denard, Patrick J. Collin, Philippe Ibrahim, Mohamed Mazzolari, Adrien Lädermann, Alexandre EFORT Open Rev Shoulder & Elbow The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening. The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis. The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont’s reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm. More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8559568/ /pubmed/34760291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 Text en © 2021 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Goetti, Patrick
Denard, Patrick J.
Collin, Philippe
Ibrahim, Mohamed
Mazzolari, Adrien
Lädermann, Alexandre
Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_short Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014
work_keys_str_mv AT goettipatrick biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT denardpatrickj biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT collinphilippe biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT ibrahimmohamed biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT mazzolariadrien biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT ladermannalexandre biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty