Cargando…
Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint react...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 |
_version_ | 1784592784812933120 |
---|---|
author | Goetti, Patrick Denard, Patrick J. Collin, Philippe Ibrahim, Mohamed Mazzolari, Adrien Lädermann, Alexandre |
author_facet | Goetti, Patrick Denard, Patrick J. Collin, Philippe Ibrahim, Mohamed Mazzolari, Adrien Lädermann, Alexandre |
author_sort | Goetti, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening. The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis. The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont’s reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm. More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8559568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85595682021-11-09 Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Goetti, Patrick Denard, Patrick J. Collin, Philippe Ibrahim, Mohamed Mazzolari, Adrien Lädermann, Alexandre EFORT Open Rev Shoulder & Elbow The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics. With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening. The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis. The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont’s reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm. More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8559568/ /pubmed/34760291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 Text en © 2021 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. |
spellingShingle | Shoulder & Elbow Goetti, Patrick Denard, Patrick J. Collin, Philippe Ibrahim, Mohamed Mazzolari, Adrien Lädermann, Alexandre Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title | Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full | Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title_short | Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
title_sort | biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
topic | Shoulder & Elbow |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goettipatrick biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT denardpatrickj biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT collinphilippe biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT ibrahimmohamed biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT mazzolariadrien biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT ladermannalexandre biomechanicsofanatomicandreverseshoulderarthroplasty |