Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence

BACKGROUND: The global utilization of the physician assistant/associate (PA) is growing. Their increasing presence is in response to the rising demands of demographic changes, new developments in healthcare, and physician shortages. While PAs are present on four continents, the evidence of whether t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Brink, G. T. W. J., Hooker, R. S., Van Vught, A. J., Vermeulen, H., Laurant, M. G. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259183
_version_ 1784592843127390208
author van den Brink, G. T. W. J.
Hooker, R. S.
Van Vught, A. J.
Vermeulen, H.
Laurant, M. G. H.
author_facet van den Brink, G. T. W. J.
Hooker, R. S.
Van Vught, A. J.
Vermeulen, H.
Laurant, M. G. H.
author_sort van den Brink, G. T. W. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global utilization of the physician assistant/associate (PA) is growing. Their increasing presence is in response to the rising demands of demographic changes, new developments in healthcare, and physician shortages. While PAs are present on four continents, the evidence of whether their employment contributes to more efficient healthcare has not been assessed in the aggregate. We undertook a systematic review of the literature on PA cost-effectiveness as compared to physicians. Cost-effectiveness was operationalized as quality, accessibility, and the cost of care. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Literature to June 2021 was searched across five biomedical databases and filtered for eligibility. Publications that met the inclusion criteria were categorized by date, country, design, and results by three researchers independently. All studies were screened with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies—of Interventions (ROBIN-I) tool. The literature search produced 4,855 titles, and after applying criteria, 39 studies met inclusion (34 North America, 4 Europe, 1 Africa). Ten studies had a prospective design, and 29 were retrospective. Four studies were assessed as biased in results reporting. While most studies included a small number of PAs, five studies were national in origin and assessed the employment of a few hundred PAs and their care of thousands of patients. In 34 studies, the PA was employed as a substitute for traditional physician services, and in five studies, the PA was employed in a complementary role. The quality of care delivered by a PA was comparable to a physician’s care in 15 studies, and in 18 studies, the quality of care exceeded that of a physician. In total, 29 studies showed that both labor and resource costs were lower when the PA delivered the care than when the physician delivered the care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies were of good methodological quality, and the results point in the same direction; PAs delivered the same or better care outcomes as physicians with the same or less cost of care. Sometimes this efficiency was due to their reduced labor cost and sometimes because they were more effective as producers of care and activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8559935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85599352021-11-02 The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence van den Brink, G. T. W. J. Hooker, R. S. Van Vught, A. J. Vermeulen, H. Laurant, M. G. H. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The global utilization of the physician assistant/associate (PA) is growing. Their increasing presence is in response to the rising demands of demographic changes, new developments in healthcare, and physician shortages. While PAs are present on four continents, the evidence of whether their employment contributes to more efficient healthcare has not been assessed in the aggregate. We undertook a systematic review of the literature on PA cost-effectiveness as compared to physicians. Cost-effectiveness was operationalized as quality, accessibility, and the cost of care. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Literature to June 2021 was searched across five biomedical databases and filtered for eligibility. Publications that met the inclusion criteria were categorized by date, country, design, and results by three researchers independently. All studies were screened with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies—of Interventions (ROBIN-I) tool. The literature search produced 4,855 titles, and after applying criteria, 39 studies met inclusion (34 North America, 4 Europe, 1 Africa). Ten studies had a prospective design, and 29 were retrospective. Four studies were assessed as biased in results reporting. While most studies included a small number of PAs, five studies were national in origin and assessed the employment of a few hundred PAs and their care of thousands of patients. In 34 studies, the PA was employed as a substitute for traditional physician services, and in five studies, the PA was employed in a complementary role. The quality of care delivered by a PA was comparable to a physician’s care in 15 studies, and in 18 studies, the quality of care exceeded that of a physician. In total, 29 studies showed that both labor and resource costs were lower when the PA delivered the care than when the physician delivered the care. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies were of good methodological quality, and the results point in the same direction; PAs delivered the same or better care outcomes as physicians with the same or less cost of care. Sometimes this efficiency was due to their reduced labor cost and sometimes because they were more effective as producers of care and activity. Public Library of Science 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8559935/ /pubmed/34723999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259183 Text en © 2021 van den Brink et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van den Brink, G. T. W. J.
Hooker, R. S.
Van Vught, A. J.
Vermeulen, H.
Laurant, M. G. H.
The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title_full The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title_short The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence
title_sort cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: a systematic review of international evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8559935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259183
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbrinkgtwj thecosteffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT hookerrs thecosteffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT vanvughtaj thecosteffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT vermeulenh thecosteffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT laurantmgh thecosteffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT vandenbrinkgtwj costeffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT hookerrs costeffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT vanvughtaj costeffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT vermeulenh costeffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence
AT laurantmgh costeffectivenessofphysicianassistantsassociatesasystematicreviewofinternationalevidence