Cargando…

Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population

BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rate of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients were higher than the younger population. Different scoring systems, including The quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment (qSOFA), Combination of Confusion, Urea, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Chunxin, Chen, Yue, Shi, Wen, Pan, Teng, Deng, Jinhai, Xu, Jiayi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737556
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S335315
_version_ 1784592869295652864
author Lv, Chunxin
Chen, Yue
Shi, Wen
Pan, Teng
Deng, Jinhai
Xu, Jiayi
author_facet Lv, Chunxin
Chen, Yue
Shi, Wen
Pan, Teng
Deng, Jinhai
Xu, Jiayi
author_sort Lv, Chunxin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rate of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients were higher than the younger population. Different scoring systems, including The quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment (qSOFA), Combination of Confusion, Urea, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, and Age ≥65 (CURB-65), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and National Early Warning Score (NEWS), were used widely for predicting mortality and ICU admission of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aimed to identify the most suitable score system for better hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed elderly patients with CAP in Minhang Hospital, Fudan University from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2020. We recorded information of the patients including age, gender, underlying disease, consciousness state, vital signs, physiological and laboratory variables and further calculated the qSOFA, CURB-65, MEWS, and NEWS scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the mortality risk and ICU admission. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used in survival rate. RESULTS: In total, 1044 patients were selected for analysis and divided into two groups, namely survivor groups (902 cases) and non-survivor groups (142 cases). Depending on ICU admission enrolled patients were classified into ICU admission (n = 102) and non-ICU admission (n = 942) groups. Mortality expressed as AUC values were 0.844 (p < 0.001), 0.868 (p < 0.001), 0.927 (p < 0.001) and 0.892 (p < 0.001) for qSOFA, CURB 65, MEWS and NEWS, respectively. There were clear differences in MEWS vs CURB-65 (p < 0.0001), MEWS vs NEWS (p < 0.001), MEWS vs qSOFA (p < 0.0001). For ICU-admission, the AUC values of qSOFA, CURB-65, MEWS and NEWS scores were 0.866 (p < 0.001), 0.854 (p < 0.001), 0.922 (p < 0.001), 0.976 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in NEWS vs CURB-65 (p < 0.0001), NEWS vs MEWS (p < 0.001), NEWS vs qSOFA (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We explored the outcome prediction values of CURB65, qSOFA, MEWS and NEWS for patients aged 65-years and older with community-acquired pneumonia. We found that MEWS showed superiority over the other severity scores in predicting hospital mortality, and NEWS showed superiority over the other scores in predicting ICU admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85600642021-11-03 Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population Lv, Chunxin Chen, Yue Shi, Wen Pan, Teng Deng, Jinhai Xu, Jiayi Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rate of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients were higher than the younger population. Different scoring systems, including The quick Sequential Organ Function Assessment (qSOFA), Combination of Confusion, Urea, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, and Age ≥65 (CURB-65), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and National Early Warning Score (NEWS), were used widely for predicting mortality and ICU admission of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aimed to identify the most suitable score system for better hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed elderly patients with CAP in Minhang Hospital, Fudan University from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2020. We recorded information of the patients including age, gender, underlying disease, consciousness state, vital signs, physiological and laboratory variables and further calculated the qSOFA, CURB-65, MEWS, and NEWS scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict the mortality risk and ICU admission. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used in survival rate. RESULTS: In total, 1044 patients were selected for analysis and divided into two groups, namely survivor groups (902 cases) and non-survivor groups (142 cases). Depending on ICU admission enrolled patients were classified into ICU admission (n = 102) and non-ICU admission (n = 942) groups. Mortality expressed as AUC values were 0.844 (p < 0.001), 0.868 (p < 0.001), 0.927 (p < 0.001) and 0.892 (p < 0.001) for qSOFA, CURB 65, MEWS and NEWS, respectively. There were clear differences in MEWS vs CURB-65 (p < 0.0001), MEWS vs NEWS (p < 0.001), MEWS vs qSOFA (p < 0.0001). For ICU-admission, the AUC values of qSOFA, CURB-65, MEWS and NEWS scores were 0.866 (p < 0.001), 0.854 (p < 0.001), 0.922 (p < 0.001), 0.976 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in NEWS vs CURB-65 (p < 0.0001), NEWS vs MEWS (p < 0.001), NEWS vs qSOFA (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We explored the outcome prediction values of CURB65, qSOFA, MEWS and NEWS for patients aged 65-years and older with community-acquired pneumonia. We found that MEWS showed superiority over the other severity scores in predicting hospital mortality, and NEWS showed superiority over the other scores in predicting ICU admission. Dove 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8560064/ /pubmed/34737556 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S335315 Text en © 2021 Lv et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lv, Chunxin
Chen, Yue
Shi, Wen
Pan, Teng
Deng, Jinhai
Xu, Jiayi
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title_full Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title_short Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
title_sort comparison of different scoring systems for prediction of mortality and icu admission in elderly cap population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737556
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S335315
work_keys_str_mv AT lvchunxin comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation
AT chenyue comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation
AT shiwen comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation
AT panteng comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation
AT dengjinhai comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation
AT xujiayi comparisonofdifferentscoringsystemsforpredictionofmortalityandicuadmissioninelderlycappopulation