Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cong, Lele, Sun, Hongyan, Hao, Miao, Sun, Qian, Zheng, Yang, Cong, Xianling, Jiang, Rihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714
_version_ 1784592908221939712
author Cong, Lele
Sun, Hongyan
Hao, Miao
Sun, Qian
Zheng, Yang
Cong, Xianling
Jiang, Rihua
author_facet Cong, Lele
Sun, Hongyan
Hao, Miao
Sun, Qian
Zheng, Yang
Cong, Xianling
Jiang, Rihua
author_sort Cong, Lele
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I(2) = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I(2) = 55%, P < 0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I(2) = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I(2) = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I(2) = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I(2) = 55%, P=0.79). CONCLUSION: Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85602712021-11-02 The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Cong, Lele Sun, Hongyan Hao, Miao Sun, Qian Zheng, Yang Cong, Xianling Jiang, Rihua J Oncol Review Article OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I(2) = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I(2) = 55%, P < 0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I(2) = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I(2) = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I(2) = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I(2) = 55%, P=0.79). CONCLUSION: Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China. Hindawi 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8560271/ /pubmed/34733328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lele Cong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cong, Lele
Sun, Hongyan
Hao, Miao
Sun, Qian
Zheng, Yang
Cong, Xianling
Jiang, Rihua
The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of lncrna slncr1 in cancers: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714
work_keys_str_mv AT conglele theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT sunhongyan theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT haomiao theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT sunqian theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT zhengyang theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT congxianling theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT jiangrihua theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT conglele prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT sunhongyan prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT haomiao prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT sunqian prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT zhengyang prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT congxianling prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis
AT jiangrihua prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis