Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714 |
_version_ | 1784592908221939712 |
---|---|
author | Cong, Lele Sun, Hongyan Hao, Miao Sun, Qian Zheng, Yang Cong, Xianling Jiang, Rihua |
author_facet | Cong, Lele Sun, Hongyan Hao, Miao Sun, Qian Zheng, Yang Cong, Xianling Jiang, Rihua |
author_sort | Cong, Lele |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I(2) = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I(2) = 55%, P < 0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I(2) = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I(2) = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I(2) = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I(2) = 55%, P=0.79). CONCLUSION: Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8560271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85602712021-11-02 The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis Cong, Lele Sun, Hongyan Hao, Miao Sun, Qian Zheng, Yang Cong, Xianling Jiang, Rihua J Oncol Review Article OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to identify the prognostic value of SLNCR1 in multiple cancer types. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, BioMed Central, Springer, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), were searched for relevant studies up to August 2021, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between SLNCR1 expression and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 12 studies with a total of 1155 patients with 9 different types of cancers were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR indicates that high SLNCR1 expression represented poorer prognosis of cancer (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, I(2) = 0%, P < 0.00001). Additionally, high SLNCR1 expression was correlated with TNM stage (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08–2.74, I(2) = 62%, P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR:2.42, 95% CI: 1.61–3.64, I(2) = 55%, P < 0.0001), and distant metastases (DM) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.50–3.55, I(2) = 27%, P=0.0002). However, no evidence was found for a relationship between SLNCR1 expression and clinical features such as tumor size (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.93–3.14, I(2) = 71%, P=0.09), age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.68–1.08, I(2) = 0%, P=0.19), or gender (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.64–1.81, I(2) = 55%, P=0.79). CONCLUSION: Our findings found that high SLNCR1 expression was associated with poor OS, advanced tumor stage, tumor size, LNM, and DM in multiple cancers, indicating that SLNCR1 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients in China. Hindawi 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8560271/ /pubmed/34733328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lele Cong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Cong, Lele Sun, Hongyan Hao, Miao Sun, Qian Zheng, Yang Cong, Xianling Jiang, Rihua The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title | The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of LncRNA SLNCR1 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of lncrna slncr1 in cancers: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3161714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conglele theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT sunhongyan theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT haomiao theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT sunqian theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT zhengyang theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT congxianling theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT jiangrihua theprognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT conglele prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT sunhongyan prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT haomiao prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT sunqian prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT zhengyang prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT congxianling prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis AT jiangrihua prognosticvalueoflncrnaslncr1incancersametaanalysis |