Cargando…

Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fennell, Dean A, Ewings, Sean, Ottensmeier, Christian, Califano, Raffaele, Hanna, Gerard G, Hill, Kayleigh, Danson, Sarah, Steele, Nicola, Nye, Mavis, Johnson, Lucy, Lord, Joanne, Middleton, Calley, Szlosarek, Peter, Chan, Sam, Gaba, Aarti, Darlison, Liz, Wells-Jordan, Peter, Richards, Cathy, Poile, Charlotte, Lester, Jason F, Griffiths, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Pub. Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X
_version_ 1784592961144619008
author Fennell, Dean A
Ewings, Sean
Ottensmeier, Christian
Califano, Raffaele
Hanna, Gerard G
Hill, Kayleigh
Danson, Sarah
Steele, Nicola
Nye, Mavis
Johnson, Lucy
Lord, Joanne
Middleton, Calley
Szlosarek, Peter
Chan, Sam
Gaba, Aarti
Darlison, Liz
Wells-Jordan, Peter
Richards, Cathy
Poile, Charlotte
Lester, Jason F
Griffiths, Gareth
author_facet Fennell, Dean A
Ewings, Sean
Ottensmeier, Christian
Califano, Raffaele
Hanna, Gerard G
Hill, Kayleigh
Danson, Sarah
Steele, Nicola
Nye, Mavis
Johnson, Lucy
Lord, Joanne
Middleton, Calley
Szlosarek, Peter
Chan, Sam
Gaba, Aarti
Darlison, Liz
Wells-Jordan, Peter
Richards, Cathy
Poile, Charlotte
Lester, Jason F
Griffiths, Gareth
author_sort Fennell, Dean A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450. FINDINGS: Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2–16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8–4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4–2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53–0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5–12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0–8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52–0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy. FUNDING: Stand up to Cancer–Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lancet Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85606422021-11-08 Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial Fennell, Dean A Ewings, Sean Ottensmeier, Christian Califano, Raffaele Hanna, Gerard G Hill, Kayleigh Danson, Sarah Steele, Nicola Nye, Mavis Johnson, Lucy Lord, Joanne Middleton, Calley Szlosarek, Peter Chan, Sam Gaba, Aarti Darlison, Liz Wells-Jordan, Peter Richards, Cathy Poile, Charlotte Lester, Jason F Griffiths, Gareth Lancet Oncol Articles BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450. FINDINGS: Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2–16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8–4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4–2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53–0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5–12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0–8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52–0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy. FUNDING: Stand up to Cancer–Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb. Lancet Pub. Group 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8560642/ /pubmed/34656227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Fennell, Dean A
Ewings, Sean
Ottensmeier, Christian
Califano, Raffaele
Hanna, Gerard G
Hill, Kayleigh
Danson, Sarah
Steele, Nicola
Nye, Mavis
Johnson, Lucy
Lord, Joanne
Middleton, Calley
Szlosarek, Peter
Chan, Sam
Gaba, Aarti
Darlison, Liz
Wells-Jordan, Peter
Richards, Cathy
Poile, Charlotte
Lester, Jason F
Griffiths, Gareth
Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title_full Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title_fullStr Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title_short Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
title_sort nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (confirm): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X
work_keys_str_mv AT fennelldeana nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT ewingssean nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT ottensmeierchristian nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT califanoraffaele nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT hannagerardg nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT hillkayleigh nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT dansonsarah nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT steelenicola nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT nyemavis nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT johnsonlucy nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT lordjoanne nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT middletoncalley nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT szlosarekpeter nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT chansam nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT gabaaarti nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT darlisonliz nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT wellsjordanpeter nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT richardscathy nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT poilecharlotte nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT lesterjasonf nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT griffithsgareth nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial
AT nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial