Cargando…
Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial
BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lancet Pub. Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X |
_version_ | 1784592961144619008 |
---|---|
author | Fennell, Dean A Ewings, Sean Ottensmeier, Christian Califano, Raffaele Hanna, Gerard G Hill, Kayleigh Danson, Sarah Steele, Nicola Nye, Mavis Johnson, Lucy Lord, Joanne Middleton, Calley Szlosarek, Peter Chan, Sam Gaba, Aarti Darlison, Liz Wells-Jordan, Peter Richards, Cathy Poile, Charlotte Lester, Jason F Griffiths, Gareth |
author_facet | Fennell, Dean A Ewings, Sean Ottensmeier, Christian Califano, Raffaele Hanna, Gerard G Hill, Kayleigh Danson, Sarah Steele, Nicola Nye, Mavis Johnson, Lucy Lord, Joanne Middleton, Calley Szlosarek, Peter Chan, Sam Gaba, Aarti Darlison, Liz Wells-Jordan, Peter Richards, Cathy Poile, Charlotte Lester, Jason F Griffiths, Gareth |
author_sort | Fennell, Dean A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450. FINDINGS: Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2–16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8–4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4–2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53–0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5–12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0–8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52–0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy. FUNDING: Stand up to Cancer–Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8560642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lancet Pub. Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85606422021-11-08 Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial Fennell, Dean A Ewings, Sean Ottensmeier, Christian Califano, Raffaele Hanna, Gerard G Hill, Kayleigh Danson, Sarah Steele, Nicola Nye, Mavis Johnson, Lucy Lord, Joanne Middleton, Calley Szlosarek, Peter Chan, Sam Gaba, Aarti Darlison, Liz Wells-Jordan, Peter Richards, Cathy Poile, Charlotte Lester, Jason F Griffiths, Gareth Lancet Oncol Articles BACKGROUND: No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450. FINDINGS: Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2–16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8–4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4–2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53–0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5–12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0–8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52–0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy. FUNDING: Stand up to Cancer–Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb. Lancet Pub. Group 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8560642/ /pubmed/34656227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Fennell, Dean A Ewings, Sean Ottensmeier, Christian Califano, Raffaele Hanna, Gerard G Hill, Kayleigh Danson, Sarah Steele, Nicola Nye, Mavis Johnson, Lucy Lord, Joanne Middleton, Calley Szlosarek, Peter Chan, Sam Gaba, Aarti Darlison, Liz Wells-Jordan, Peter Richards, Cathy Poile, Charlotte Lester, Jason F Griffiths, Gareth Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title | Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title_full | Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title_fullStr | Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title_short | Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
title_sort | nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (confirm): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fennelldeana nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT ewingssean nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT ottensmeierchristian nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT califanoraffaele nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT hannagerardg nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT hillkayleigh nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT dansonsarah nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT steelenicola nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT nyemavis nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT johnsonlucy nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT lordjoanne nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT middletoncalley nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT szlosarekpeter nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT chansam nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT gabaaarti nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT darlisonliz nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT wellsjordanpeter nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT richardscathy nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT poilecharlotte nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT lesterjasonf nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT griffithsgareth nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial AT nivolumabversusplaceboinpatientswithrelapsedmalignantmesotheliomaconfirmamulticentredoubleblindrandomisedphase3trial |