Cargando…

A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)

To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reicherz, Alina, Westhues, Hannah, Häuser, Lorine, Wenzel, Patricia, Noldus, Joachim, Bach, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z
_version_ 1784592966021545984
author Reicherz, Alina
Westhues, Hannah
Häuser, Lorine
Wenzel, Patricia
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
author_facet Reicherz, Alina
Westhues, Hannah
Häuser, Lorine
Wenzel, Patricia
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
author_sort Reicherz, Alina
collection PubMed
description To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 ± 1.3 min versus 24.0 ± 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively (p = 0.06 and p = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group (p = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: p = 0.09; Pain Index: p = 0.67). However, after 3–5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy (p = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study (p = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85606722021-11-15 A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) Reicherz, Alina Westhues, Hannah Häuser, Lorine Wenzel, Patricia Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter Urolithiasis Original Paper To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 ± 1.3 min versus 24.0 ± 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively (p = 0.06 and p = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group (p = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: p = 0.09; Pain Index: p = 0.67). However, after 3–5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy (p = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study (p = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8560672/ /pubmed/34146117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Reicherz, Alina
Westhues, Hannah
Häuser, Lorine
Wenzel, Patricia
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title_full A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title_fullStr A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title_full_unstemmed A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title_short A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
title_sort randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-j insertion after primary urs and stone extraction (fast 3)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z
work_keys_str_mv AT reicherzalina arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT westhueshannah arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT hauserlorine arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT wenzelpatricia arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT noldusjoachim arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT bachpeter arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT reicherzalina randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT westhueshannah randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT hauserlorine randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT wenzelpatricia randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT noldusjoachim randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3
AT bachpeter randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3