Cargando…
A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3)
To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z |
_version_ | 1784592966021545984 |
---|---|
author | Reicherz, Alina Westhues, Hannah Häuser, Lorine Wenzel, Patricia Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter |
author_facet | Reicherz, Alina Westhues, Hannah Häuser, Lorine Wenzel, Patricia Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter |
author_sort | Reicherz, Alina |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 ± 1.3 min versus 24.0 ± 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively (p = 0.06 and p = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group (p = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: p = 0.09; Pain Index: p = 0.67). However, after 3–5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy (p = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study (p = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8560672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85606722021-11-15 A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) Reicherz, Alina Westhues, Hannah Häuser, Lorine Wenzel, Patricia Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter Urolithiasis Original Paper To compare the outcome of a short-term insertion of a mono-J catheter for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal to a conventional double-J catheter. This single-center academic study (Fast Track Stent study 3) evaluated stenting in 108 patients with urinary calculi after ureterorenoscopy. Patients were prospectively randomized into two study arms before primary ureterorenoscopy: (1) mono-J insertion for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and (2) double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. Study endpoints were stent-related symptoms assessed by an ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) and reintervention rates. Stone sizes and location, age, operation duration, BMI, and gender were recorded. Of 67 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy, 36 patients were analyzed in the double-J arm and 31 patients in the mono-J arm. Mean operation time was 27.5 ± 1.3 min versus 24.0 ± 1.3 min, and stone size was 5.2 mm versus 4.5 mm for mono-J versus double-J, respectively (p = 0.06 and p = 0.15). FaST 3 was terminated early due to a high reintervention rate of 35.5% for the mono-J group and 16.7% for the double-J group (p = 0.27). One day after ureterorenoscopy, USSQ scores were similar between the study arms (Urinary Index: p = 0.09; Pain Index: p = 0.67). However, after 3–5 weeks, the Pain Index was significantly lower in those patients who had a double-J inserted after ureterorenoscopy (p = 0.04). Short-term insertion of mono-J post-ureterorenoscopy results in similar micturition symptoms and pain one day after ureterorenoscopy compared to double-J insertion. The reintervention rate was non-significant between the treatment groups most likely due to the early termination of the study (p = 0.27). Ethics approval/Trail Registration: No. 18-6435, 2018 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8560672/ /pubmed/34146117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Reicherz, Alina Westhues, Hannah Häuser, Lorine Wenzel, Patricia Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title | A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title_full | A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title_fullStr | A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title_short | A randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-J insertion after primary URS and stone extraction (FaST 3) |
title_sort | randomized prospective study: assessment of transient ureteral stenting by mono-j insertion after primary urs and stone extraction (fast 3) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34146117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01277-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reicherzalina arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT westhueshannah arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT hauserlorine arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT wenzelpatricia arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT noldusjoachim arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT bachpeter arandomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT reicherzalina randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT westhueshannah randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT hauserlorine randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT wenzelpatricia randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT noldusjoachim randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 AT bachpeter randomizedprospectivestudyassessmentoftransientureteralstentingbymonojinsertionafterprimaryursandstoneextractionfast3 |