Cargando…

Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy

To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of short-term Mono-J insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal. Patients treated with a Mono-J for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and stone removal were analysed. FaST 1 and 2 (Fast Track Stent Studies), two consecutive single academic centre stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reicherz, Alina, Maas, Verena, Reike, Moritz, Brehmer, Mirco, Noldus, Joachim, Bach, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4
_version_ 1784592978168250368
author Reicherz, Alina
Maas, Verena
Reike, Moritz
Brehmer, Mirco
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
author_facet Reicherz, Alina
Maas, Verena
Reike, Moritz
Brehmer, Mirco
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
author_sort Reicherz, Alina
collection PubMed
description To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of short-term Mono-J insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal. Patients treated with a Mono-J for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and stone removal were analysed. FaST 1 and 2 (Fast Track Stent Studies), two consecutive single academic centre studies, were conducted between August 2014 and April 2018. In each study, we randomized patients with renal or ureteral calculi to two groups before ureterorenoscopy. FaST 1 compared a Mono-J insertion for 6 h versus Double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. FaST 2 compared a Mono-J insertion to a tubeless procedure in the same clinical setting. All patients were pre-stented for 3–5 days before URS. The study endpoint was stent-related symptoms as assessed by a validated questionnaire (USSQ). Results were stratified by clinical parameters, stone characteristics and operation details. 108 of 156 initially randomized patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy were included. USSQ scores covering the time 3–5 weeks after stone removal showed a significantly reduced urinary symptoms and pain index compared to the scores before ureterorenoscopy. USSQ results before and after stone removal did not correlate with stone size or operation time and did not differ significantly depending on stone localization, the treating endourologist, or ureterorenoscopic device used (p > 0.05). Six patients (5%) required reintervention. Following secondary ureterorenoscopy and ureteral drainage with a Mono-J for 6 h, quality of life is independent of stone size and localization, operation time, the treating endourologist, and the URS device used. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85607262021-11-15 Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy Reicherz, Alina Maas, Verena Reike, Moritz Brehmer, Mirco Noldus, Joachim Bach, Peter Urolithiasis Original Paper To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of short-term Mono-J insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal. Patients treated with a Mono-J for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and stone removal were analysed. FaST 1 and 2 (Fast Track Stent Studies), two consecutive single academic centre studies, were conducted between August 2014 and April 2018. In each study, we randomized patients with renal or ureteral calculi to two groups before ureterorenoscopy. FaST 1 compared a Mono-J insertion for 6 h versus Double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. FaST 2 compared a Mono-J insertion to a tubeless procedure in the same clinical setting. All patients were pre-stented for 3–5 days before URS. The study endpoint was stent-related symptoms as assessed by a validated questionnaire (USSQ). Results were stratified by clinical parameters, stone characteristics and operation details. 108 of 156 initially randomized patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy were included. USSQ scores covering the time 3–5 weeks after stone removal showed a significantly reduced urinary symptoms and pain index compared to the scores before ureterorenoscopy. USSQ results before and after stone removal did not correlate with stone size or operation time and did not differ significantly depending on stone localization, the treating endourologist, or ureterorenoscopic device used (p > 0.05). Six patients (5%) required reintervention. Following secondary ureterorenoscopy and ureteral drainage with a Mono-J for 6 h, quality of life is independent of stone size and localization, operation time, the treating endourologist, and the URS device used. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8560726/ /pubmed/33847780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Reicherz, Alina
Maas, Verena
Reike, Moritz
Brehmer, Mirco
Noldus, Joachim
Bach, Peter
Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title_full Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title_fullStr Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title_short Striking a balance: outcomes of short-term Mono-J placement following ureterorenoscopy
title_sort striking a balance: outcomes of short-term mono-j placement following ureterorenoscopy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reicherzalina strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy
AT maasverena strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy
AT reikemoritz strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy
AT brehmermirco strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy
AT noldusjoachim strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy
AT bachpeter strikingabalanceoutcomesofshorttermmonojplacementfollowingureterorenoscopy