Cargando…

Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma

To date, there exists no established endoscopic surveillance interval strategy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric adenoma. In this study, we suggest a risk factor-based statistical model for optimal surveillance intervals for gastric adenoma after ESD with curative resection. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Choong-Kyun, Lee, Eunyoung, Lee, Gil Ho, Lim, Sun Gyo, Lee, Kee Myung, Roh, Jin, Kim, Young Bae, Park, Bumhee, Shin, Sung Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00969-1
_version_ 1784592999692369920
author Noh, Choong-Kyun
Lee, Eunyoung
Lee, Gil Ho
Lim, Sun Gyo
Lee, Kee Myung
Roh, Jin
Kim, Young Bae
Park, Bumhee
Shin, Sung Jae
author_facet Noh, Choong-Kyun
Lee, Eunyoung
Lee, Gil Ho
Lim, Sun Gyo
Lee, Kee Myung
Roh, Jin
Kim, Young Bae
Park, Bumhee
Shin, Sung Jae
author_sort Noh, Choong-Kyun
collection PubMed
description To date, there exists no established endoscopic surveillance interval strategy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric adenoma. In this study, we suggest a risk factor-based statistical model for optimal surveillance intervals for gastric adenoma after ESD with curative resection. A cox proportional hazard model was applied to identify risk factors for recurrence after ESD. Patients (n = 698) were categorized into groups based on the identified risk factors. The cumulative density of recurrence over time was computed using a cubic splined baseline hazard function, and the customized surveillance interval was modeled for each risk group. The overall cumulative incidence of recurrence was 7.3% (n = 51). Risk factors associated with recurrence were male (hazard ratio [HR], 2.60, P = 0.030), protruded scar (HR, 3.18, P < 0.001), and age ≥ 59 years (HR, 1.05, P < 0.001). The surveillance interval for each group was developed by using the recurrence limit for the generated risk groups. According to the developed schedule, high-risk patients would have a maximum of seven surveillance visits for 5 years, whereas low-risk patients would have biennial surveillance for cancer screening. We proposed a simple and promising strategy for determining a better endoscopic surveillance interval by parameterizing diverse and group-specific recurrence risk factors into a well-known survival model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85608182021-11-03 Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma Noh, Choong-Kyun Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Gil Ho Lim, Sun Gyo Lee, Kee Myung Roh, Jin Kim, Young Bae Park, Bumhee Shin, Sung Jae Sci Rep Article To date, there exists no established endoscopic surveillance interval strategy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric adenoma. In this study, we suggest a risk factor-based statistical model for optimal surveillance intervals for gastric adenoma after ESD with curative resection. A cox proportional hazard model was applied to identify risk factors for recurrence after ESD. Patients (n = 698) were categorized into groups based on the identified risk factors. The cumulative density of recurrence over time was computed using a cubic splined baseline hazard function, and the customized surveillance interval was modeled for each risk group. The overall cumulative incidence of recurrence was 7.3% (n = 51). Risk factors associated with recurrence were male (hazard ratio [HR], 2.60, P = 0.030), protruded scar (HR, 3.18, P < 0.001), and age ≥ 59 years (HR, 1.05, P < 0.001). The surveillance interval for each group was developed by using the recurrence limit for the generated risk groups. According to the developed schedule, high-risk patients would have a maximum of seven surveillance visits for 5 years, whereas low-risk patients would have biennial surveillance for cancer screening. We proposed a simple and promising strategy for determining a better endoscopic surveillance interval by parameterizing diverse and group-specific recurrence risk factors into a well-known survival model. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8560818/ /pubmed/34725444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00969-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Noh, Choong-Kyun
Lee, Eunyoung
Lee, Gil Ho
Lim, Sun Gyo
Lee, Kee Myung
Roh, Jin
Kim, Young Bae
Park, Bumhee
Shin, Sung Jae
Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title_full Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title_fullStr Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title_full_unstemmed Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title_short Risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
title_sort risk factor-based optimal endoscopic surveillance intervals after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00969-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nohchoongkyun riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT leeeunyoung riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT leegilho riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT limsungyo riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT leekeemyung riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT rohjin riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT kimyoungbae riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT parkbumhee riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma
AT shinsungjae riskfactorbasedoptimalendoscopicsurveillanceintervalsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforgastricadenoma