Cargando…

Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions

Knowledge of eye position in the brain is critical for localization of objects in space. To investigate the accuracy and precision of eye position feedback in an unreferenced environment, subjects with normal ocular alignment attempted to localize briefly presented targets during monocular and dicho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karsolia, Apoorva, Stevenson, Scott B., Das, Vallabh E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00597-9
_version_ 1784593026323054592
author Karsolia, Apoorva
Stevenson, Scott B.
Das, Vallabh E.
author_facet Karsolia, Apoorva
Stevenson, Scott B.
Das, Vallabh E.
author_sort Karsolia, Apoorva
collection PubMed
description Knowledge of eye position in the brain is critical for localization of objects in space. To investigate the accuracy and precision of eye position feedback in an unreferenced environment, subjects with normal ocular alignment attempted to localize briefly presented targets during monocular and dichoptic viewing. In the task, subjects’ used a computer mouse to position a response disk at the remembered location of the target. Under dichoptic viewing (with red (right eye)–green (left eye) glasses), target and response disks were presented to the same or alternate eyes, leading to four conditions [green target–green response cue (LL), green–red (LR), red–green (RL), and red–red (RR)]. Time interval between target and response disks was varied and localization errors were the difference between the estimated and real positions of the target disk. Overall, the precision of spatial localization (variance across trials) became progressively worse with time. Under dichoptic viewing, localization errors were significantly greater for alternate-eye trials as compared to same-eye trials and were correlated to the average phoria of each subject. Our data suggests that during binocular dissociation, spatial localization may be achieved by combining a reliable versional efference copy signal with a proprioceptive signal that is unreliable perhaps because it is from the wrong eye or is too noisy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85609362021-11-03 Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions Karsolia, Apoorva Stevenson, Scott B. Das, Vallabh E. Sci Rep Article Knowledge of eye position in the brain is critical for localization of objects in space. To investigate the accuracy and precision of eye position feedback in an unreferenced environment, subjects with normal ocular alignment attempted to localize briefly presented targets during monocular and dichoptic viewing. In the task, subjects’ used a computer mouse to position a response disk at the remembered location of the target. Under dichoptic viewing (with red (right eye)–green (left eye) glasses), target and response disks were presented to the same or alternate eyes, leading to four conditions [green target–green response cue (LL), green–red (LR), red–green (RL), and red–red (RR)]. Time interval between target and response disks was varied and localization errors were the difference between the estimated and real positions of the target disk. Overall, the precision of spatial localization (variance across trials) became progressively worse with time. Under dichoptic viewing, localization errors were significantly greater for alternate-eye trials as compared to same-eye trials and were correlated to the average phoria of each subject. Our data suggests that during binocular dissociation, spatial localization may be achieved by combining a reliable versional efference copy signal with a proprioceptive signal that is unreliable perhaps because it is from the wrong eye or is too noisy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8560936/ /pubmed/34725377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00597-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Karsolia, Apoorva
Stevenson, Scott B.
Das, Vallabh E.
Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title_full Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title_fullStr Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title_full_unstemmed Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title_short Unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
title_sort unreferenced spatial localization under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00597-9
work_keys_str_mv AT karsoliaapoorva unreferencedspatiallocalizationundermonocularanddichopticviewingconditions
AT stevensonscottb unreferencedspatiallocalizationundermonocularanddichopticviewingconditions
AT dasvallabhe unreferencedspatiallocalizationundermonocularanddichopticviewingconditions