Cargando…

四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the extensive development of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary nodules, preoperative localization becomes more and more critical. There are some defects in traditional localization methods, so it is necessary to improve. The aim of this study was to compare and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.30
_version_ 1784593039500509184
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the extensive development of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary nodules, preoperative localization becomes more and more critical. There are some defects in traditional localization methods, so it is necessary to improve. The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the safety and effectiveness of two new methods, namely four-hook needle and memory alloy coil, in the localization of pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 152 patients was performed. 76 cases were in four-hook needle group, and 76 cases were in memory alloy coil group. Pulmonary nodules were located before operation, and then video-assisted wedge resection was performed. The average procedure time, localization complications and nodule resection time were counted. RESULTS: The target pulmonary nodules were successfully removed in both groups. In four-hook needle group, 76 patients found localization devices, all the pulmonary nodules were successfully removed, and one case was transferred to open the chest for wedge resection of pulmonary nodules due to severe thoracic adhesion. All 76 patients in memory alloy coil group were successfully resected with pulmonary nodules, and one patient underwent compromising enlarged resection because no lesion was found after the specimen was removed during the operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage, the success rate of localization and nodule wedge resection time between the two groups. The average time of localization in four-hook needle group was (13.66±3.11) min, lower than that of memory alloy coil group (15.51±3.65) min, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). In memory alloy coil group, when the distance from the nodule to the pleura was ≥1.5 cm and < 1.5 cm, the average localization time was (17.20±4.46) min and (14.91±3.15) min, respectively, and there was a statistical difference between the two distance (P=0.044). CONCLUSION: Four-hook needle and memory alloy coil have good safety and effectiveness, and the localization time of four-hook needle is shorter. When using memory alloy coil, the effect of the method is better for pulmonary nodules with a distance less than 1.5 cm to pleura.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8560988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85609882021-11-10 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the extensive development of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary nodules, preoperative localization becomes more and more critical. There are some defects in traditional localization methods, so it is necessary to improve. The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the safety and effectiveness of two new methods, namely four-hook needle and memory alloy coil, in the localization of pulmonary nodules. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 152 patients was performed. 76 cases were in four-hook needle group, and 76 cases were in memory alloy coil group. Pulmonary nodules were located before operation, and then video-assisted wedge resection was performed. The average procedure time, localization complications and nodule resection time were counted. RESULTS: The target pulmonary nodules were successfully removed in both groups. In four-hook needle group, 76 patients found localization devices, all the pulmonary nodules were successfully removed, and one case was transferred to open the chest for wedge resection of pulmonary nodules due to severe thoracic adhesion. All 76 patients in memory alloy coil group were successfully resected with pulmonary nodules, and one patient underwent compromising enlarged resection because no lesion was found after the specimen was removed during the operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage, the success rate of localization and nodule wedge resection time between the two groups. The average time of localization in four-hook needle group was (13.66±3.11) min, lower than that of memory alloy coil group (15.51±3.65) min, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.001). In memory alloy coil group, when the distance from the nodule to the pleura was ≥1.5 cm and < 1.5 cm, the average localization time was (17.20±4.46) min and (14.91±3.15) min, respectively, and there was a statistical difference between the two distance (P=0.044). CONCLUSION: Four-hook needle and memory alloy coil have good safety and effectiveness, and the localization time of four-hook needle is shorter. When using memory alloy coil, the effect of the method is better for pulmonary nodules with a distance less than 1.5 cm to pleura. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8560988/ /pubmed/34628780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.30 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle 临床研究
四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title_full 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title_fullStr 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title_full_unstemmed 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title_short 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
title_sort 四钩定位针和记忆合金弹簧圈在肺结节定位中的应用比较
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8560988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34628780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.30
work_keys_str_mv AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào
AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào
AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào
AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào
AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào
AT sìgōudìngwèizhēnhéjìyìhéjīndànhuángquānzàifèijiéjiédìngwèizhōngdeyīngyòngbǐjiào