Cargando…

Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews

BACKGROUND: There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However, little...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassidy, Christine E., Shin, Hwayeon Danielle, Ramage, Emily, Conway, Aislinn, Mrklas, Kelly, Laur, Celia, Beck, Amy, Varin, Melissa Demery, Steinwender, Sandy, Nguyen, Tram, Langley, Jodi, Dorey, Rachel, Donnelly, Lauren, Ormel, Ilja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0
_version_ 1784593106008539136
author Cassidy, Christine E.
Shin, Hwayeon Danielle
Ramage, Emily
Conway, Aislinn
Mrklas, Kelly
Laur, Celia
Beck, Amy
Varin, Melissa Demery
Steinwender, Sandy
Nguyen, Tram
Langley, Jodi
Dorey, Rachel
Donnelly, Lauren
Ormel, Ilja
author_facet Cassidy, Christine E.
Shin, Hwayeon Danielle
Ramage, Emily
Conway, Aislinn
Mrklas, Kelly
Laur, Celia
Beck, Amy
Varin, Melissa Demery
Steinwender, Sandy
Nguyen, Tram
Langley, Jodi
Dorey, Rachel
Donnelly, Lauren
Ormel, Ilja
author_sort Cassidy, Christine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However, little is known about how health research trainees engage in research partnership approaches such as IKT. In response, the purpose of this scoping review was to map and characterize the evidence related to using an IKT or other research partnership approach from the perspective of health research trainees in thesis and/or postdoctoral work. METHODS: We conducted this scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched the following databases in June 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched sources of unpublished studies and grey literature. We reported our findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS: We included 74 records that described trainees’ experiences using an IKT or other research partnership approach to health research. The majority of studies involved collaboration with knowledge users in the research question development, recruitment and data collection stages of the research process. Intersecting barriers to IKT or other research partnerships at the individual, interpersonal and organizational levels were reported, including lack of skills in partnership research, competing priorities and trainees’ “outsider” status. We also identified studies that evaluated their IKT approach and reported impacts on partnership formation, such as valuing different perspectives, and enhanced relevance of research. CONCLUSION: Our review provides insights for trainees interested in IKT or other research partnership approaches and offers guidance on how to apply an IKT approach to their research. The review findings can serve as a basis for future reviews and primary research focused on IKT principles, strategies and evaluation. The findings can also inform IKT training efforts such as guideline development and academic programme development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85613632021-11-02 Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews Cassidy, Christine E. Shin, Hwayeon Danielle Ramage, Emily Conway, Aislinn Mrklas, Kelly Laur, Celia Beck, Amy Varin, Melissa Demery Steinwender, Sandy Nguyen, Tram Langley, Jodi Dorey, Rachel Donnelly, Lauren Ormel, Ilja Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: There are increasing expectations for researchers and knowledge users in the health system to use a research partnership approach, such as integrated knowledge translation, to increase the relevance and use of research findings in health practice, programmes and policies. However, little is known about how health research trainees engage in research partnership approaches such as IKT. In response, the purpose of this scoping review was to map and characterize the evidence related to using an IKT or other research partnership approach from the perspective of health research trainees in thesis and/or postdoctoral work. METHODS: We conducted this scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched the following databases in June 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched sources of unpublished studies and grey literature. We reported our findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS: We included 74 records that described trainees’ experiences using an IKT or other research partnership approach to health research. The majority of studies involved collaboration with knowledge users in the research question development, recruitment and data collection stages of the research process. Intersecting barriers to IKT or other research partnerships at the individual, interpersonal and organizational levels were reported, including lack of skills in partnership research, competing priorities and trainees’ “outsider” status. We also identified studies that evaluated their IKT approach and reported impacts on partnership formation, such as valuing different perspectives, and enhanced relevance of research. CONCLUSION: Our review provides insights for trainees interested in IKT or other research partnership approaches and offers guidance on how to apply an IKT approach to their research. The review findings can serve as a basis for future reviews and primary research focused on IKT principles, strategies and evaluation. The findings can also inform IKT training efforts such as guideline development and academic programme development. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0. BioMed Central 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8561363/ /pubmed/34727926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Cassidy, Christine E.
Shin, Hwayeon Danielle
Ramage, Emily
Conway, Aislinn
Mrklas, Kelly
Laur, Celia
Beck, Amy
Varin, Melissa Demery
Steinwender, Sandy
Nguyen, Tram
Langley, Jodi
Dorey, Rachel
Donnelly, Lauren
Ormel, Ilja
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title_full Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title_fullStr Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title_full_unstemmed Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title_short Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
title_sort trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34727926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cassidychristinee traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT shinhwayeondanielle traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT ramageemily traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT conwayaislinn traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT mrklaskelly traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT laurcelia traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT beckamy traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT varinmelissademery traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT steinwendersandy traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT nguyentram traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT langleyjodi traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT doreyrachel traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT donnellylauren traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews
AT ormelilja traineeledresearchusinganintegratedknowledgetranslationorotherresearchpartnershipapproachesascopingreviews