Association of systemic inflammation indices with visual field loss progression in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma: potential biomarkers for 3P medical approaches

RELEVANCE: Accumulating evidence suggests a dysfunction of the para-inflammation in the retinal ganglion cell layer and the optic nerve head in patients with glaucoma. Currently, circulating blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are regarded as novel indicators of systemic inflammation. Biomarkers allow early identification of patients with visual field (VF) loss progression and timely implementation of replacement therapies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether higher inflammatory indices (PLR, NLR, and LMR) were associated with VF loss progression in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) for the predictive diagnostics, targeted prevention, and personalization of medical services. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed up 277 patients with PACG for at least 24 months, with clinical examination and VF testing every 6 months. Inflammatory cell quantification, including platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes, was measured using the Sysmex XN-A1 automated inflammatory cells quantification system. Three systemic inflammatory indices, PLR, NLR, and LMR, were determined on the basis of baseline neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts in patients with PACG. The risk factors for PACG were analyzed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and the Kaplan–Meier curve. RESULTS: Our results revealed that 111 (40.07%) patients showed VF loss progression. The PLR was significantly higher (P = 0.046) in the progression group than in the non-progression group. A higher PLR (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.08, P = 0.004) was a risk factor for PACG progression. In multivariate analyses, PLR independently predicted VF loss progression (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01, P = 0.04). Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that higher PLR indicated significantly higher rates of VF loss progression (66.91% vs. 52.90%, P = 0.03). Comparable results were observed in the male and female subgroups. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed the significant association between a high PLR and a greater risk of VF loss progression in patients with PACG. PLR may be highly recommended as a novel predictive/diagnostic tool for the assessment of VF loss progression from the perspectives of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine in vulnerable populations and for individual screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-021-00260-3.