Cargando…

Degree of improving TMS focality through a geometrically stable solution of an inverse TMS problem

The Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) inverse problem (TMS-IP) investigated in this study aims to focus the TMS induced electric field close to a specified target point defined on the gray matter interface in the M 1 (HAND) area while otherwise minimizing it. The goal of the study is to numeri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makarov, S.N., Wartman, W.A., Noetscher, G.M., Fujimoto, K., Zaidi, T., Burnham, E.H., Daneshzand, M., Nummenmaa, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34332043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118437
Descripción
Sumario:The Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) inverse problem (TMS-IP) investigated in this study aims to focus the TMS induced electric field close to a specified target point defined on the gray matter interface in the M 1 (HAND) area while otherwise minimizing it. The goal of the study is to numerically evaluate the degree of improvement of the TMS-IP solutions relative to the well-known sulcus-aligned mapping (a projection approach with the 90° local sulcal angle). In total, 1536 individual TMS-IP solutions have been analyzed for multiple target points and multiple subjects using the boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) as the forward solver. Our results show that the optimal TMS inverse-problem solutions improve the focality – reduce the size of the field “hot spot ” and its deviation from the target – by approximately 21–33% on average for all considered subjects, all observation points, two distinct coil types, two segmentation types, two intracortical observation surfaces under study, and three tested values of the field threshold. The inverse-problem solutions with the maximized focality simultaneously improve the TMS mapping resolution (differentiation between neighbor targets separated by approximately 10 mm) although this improvement is quite modest. Coil position/orientation and conductivity uncertainties have been included into consideration as the corresponding de-focalization factors. The present results will change when the levels of uncertainties change. Our results also indicate that the accuracy of the head segmentation critically influences the expected TMS-IP performance.