Cargando…

Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture

Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Ethan, Davila, Federico, Riedy, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0
_version_ 1784593135954821120
author Gordon, Ethan
Davila, Federico
Riedy, Chris
author_facet Gordon, Ethan
Davila, Federico
Riedy, Chris
author_sort Gordon, Ethan
collection PubMed
description Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation is essential for creating more sustainable food systems. This paper focuses on discursive change. A prominent discursive alternative to industrial–productivist agriculture is regenerative agriculture. Regenerative discourses are emergent, radically evolving and diverse. It is unclear whether they have the potential to generate the changes required to shift industrial–productivist agriculture. This paper presents a literature-based discourse analysis to illustrate key thematic characteristics of regenerative agricultural discourses. The analysis finds that such discourses: situate agricultural work within nested, complex living systems; position farms as relational, characterised by co-evolution between humans and other landscape biota; perceive the innate potential of living systems as place-sourced; maintain a transformative openness to alternative thinking and practice; believe that multiple regenerative cultures are necessary for deeply regenerative agriculture; and depart from industrialism to varying degrees. The paper concludes by reviewing three transformative opportunities for regenerative discourses—discourse coalitions, translocal organising and collective learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85616792021-11-02 Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture Gordon, Ethan Davila, Federico Riedy, Chris Agric Human Values Article Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation is essential for creating more sustainable food systems. This paper focuses on discursive change. A prominent discursive alternative to industrial–productivist agriculture is regenerative agriculture. Regenerative discourses are emergent, radically evolving and diverse. It is unclear whether they have the potential to generate the changes required to shift industrial–productivist agriculture. This paper presents a literature-based discourse analysis to illustrate key thematic characteristics of regenerative agricultural discourses. The analysis finds that such discourses: situate agricultural work within nested, complex living systems; position farms as relational, characterised by co-evolution between humans and other landscape biota; perceive the innate potential of living systems as place-sourced; maintain a transformative openness to alternative thinking and practice; believe that multiple regenerative cultures are necessary for deeply regenerative agriculture; and depart from industrialism to varying degrees. The paper concludes by reviewing three transformative opportunities for regenerative discourses—discourse coalitions, translocal organising and collective learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0. Springer Netherlands 2021-11-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8561679/ /pubmed/34744301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0 Text en © Crown 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Gordon, Ethan
Davila, Federico
Riedy, Chris
Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title_full Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title_fullStr Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title_short Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
title_sort transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonethan transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture
AT davilafederico transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture
AT riedychris transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture