Cargando…
Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0 |
_version_ | 1784593135954821120 |
---|---|
author | Gordon, Ethan Davila, Federico Riedy, Chris |
author_facet | Gordon, Ethan Davila, Federico Riedy, Chris |
author_sort | Gordon, Ethan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation is essential for creating more sustainable food systems. This paper focuses on discursive change. A prominent discursive alternative to industrial–productivist agriculture is regenerative agriculture. Regenerative discourses are emergent, radically evolving and diverse. It is unclear whether they have the potential to generate the changes required to shift industrial–productivist agriculture. This paper presents a literature-based discourse analysis to illustrate key thematic characteristics of regenerative agricultural discourses. The analysis finds that such discourses: situate agricultural work within nested, complex living systems; position farms as relational, characterised by co-evolution between humans and other landscape biota; perceive the innate potential of living systems as place-sourced; maintain a transformative openness to alternative thinking and practice; believe that multiple regenerative cultures are necessary for deeply regenerative agriculture; and depart from industrialism to varying degrees. The paper concludes by reviewing three transformative opportunities for regenerative discourses—discourse coalitions, translocal organising and collective learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8561679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85616792021-11-02 Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture Gordon, Ethan Davila, Federico Riedy, Chris Agric Human Values Article Agriculture occupies 38% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, using 70% of freshwater resources. Its modern practice is dominated by an industrial–productivist discourse, which has contributed to the simplification and degradation of human and ecological systems. As such, agricultural transformation is essential for creating more sustainable food systems. This paper focuses on discursive change. A prominent discursive alternative to industrial–productivist agriculture is regenerative agriculture. Regenerative discourses are emergent, radically evolving and diverse. It is unclear whether they have the potential to generate the changes required to shift industrial–productivist agriculture. This paper presents a literature-based discourse analysis to illustrate key thematic characteristics of regenerative agricultural discourses. The analysis finds that such discourses: situate agricultural work within nested, complex living systems; position farms as relational, characterised by co-evolution between humans and other landscape biota; perceive the innate potential of living systems as place-sourced; maintain a transformative openness to alternative thinking and practice; believe that multiple regenerative cultures are necessary for deeply regenerative agriculture; and depart from industrialism to varying degrees. The paper concludes by reviewing three transformative opportunities for regenerative discourses—discourse coalitions, translocal organising and collective learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0. Springer Netherlands 2021-11-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8561679/ /pubmed/34744301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0 Text en © Crown 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Gordon, Ethan Davila, Federico Riedy, Chris Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title | Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title_full | Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title_fullStr | Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title_full_unstemmed | Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title_short | Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
title_sort | transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10276-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonethan transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture AT davilafederico transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture AT riedychris transforminglandscapesandmindscapesthroughregenerativeagriculture |