Cargando…

An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology

Scientific education provides a set of tools to make sense of a complex world by teasing out complicated cause-and-effect relationships, such as the elimination of effects of confounding factors in controlled experiments. There is evidence that depth of understanding of controlled experiments is lac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreher, Scott A., Pavlova, Iglika V., Nelms, April
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00172-21
_version_ 1784593152327286784
author Kreher, Scott A.
Pavlova, Iglika V.
Nelms, April
author_facet Kreher, Scott A.
Pavlova, Iglika V.
Nelms, April
author_sort Kreher, Scott A.
collection PubMed
description Scientific education provides a set of tools to make sense of a complex world by teasing out complicated cause-and-effect relationships, such as the elimination of effects of confounding factors in controlled experiments. There is evidence that depth of understanding of controlled experiments is lacking among undergraduate science students despite exposure to controlled experiments in courses. To examine the understanding of controlled experiments, we developed a two-tiered assessment that includes closed-ended and open-ended questions, with three types of questions, i.e., (i) a scientific scenario about a flawed drug study, (ii) an everyday-life scenario about flawed thinking regarding product effectiveness, and (iii) a direct question about explaining controlled experiments. Consistent with previous findings, we demonstrated that large percentages of students in introductory biology courses at both a research-intensive institution and a primarily undergraduate, minority-serving institution failed to recognize the need to account for confounds. Based on these findings, we tested the hypothesis that scientific literacy could be improved through a course-based intervention using an active learning framework focused on science as a process of evaluating alternative hypotheses. We found start-to-end-of-semester improvement in students’ identification of unaccounted confounds with a scientific scenario in an intervention course but not in the control course. Interestingly, students in both the control and intervention courses showed improvement when tested with a scenario based on everyday life. The study findings suggest that a concerning number of college students may not account sufficiently for uncontrolled variables in real-life situations, and we present a widely applicable instructional strategy that improves on this broadly relevant scientific reasoning skill.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85618342021-11-18 An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology Kreher, Scott A. Pavlova, Iglika V. Nelms, April J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Article Scientific education provides a set of tools to make sense of a complex world by teasing out complicated cause-and-effect relationships, such as the elimination of effects of confounding factors in controlled experiments. There is evidence that depth of understanding of controlled experiments is lacking among undergraduate science students despite exposure to controlled experiments in courses. To examine the understanding of controlled experiments, we developed a two-tiered assessment that includes closed-ended and open-ended questions, with three types of questions, i.e., (i) a scientific scenario about a flawed drug study, (ii) an everyday-life scenario about flawed thinking regarding product effectiveness, and (iii) a direct question about explaining controlled experiments. Consistent with previous findings, we demonstrated that large percentages of students in introductory biology courses at both a research-intensive institution and a primarily undergraduate, minority-serving institution failed to recognize the need to account for confounds. Based on these findings, we tested the hypothesis that scientific literacy could be improved through a course-based intervention using an active learning framework focused on science as a process of evaluating alternative hypotheses. We found start-to-end-of-semester improvement in students’ identification of unaccounted confounds with a scientific scenario in an intervention course but not in the control course. Interestingly, students in both the control and intervention courses showed improvement when tested with a scenario based on everyday life. The study findings suggest that a concerning number of college students may not account sufficiently for uncontrolled variables in real-life situations, and we present a widely applicable instructional strategy that improves on this broadly relevant scientific reasoning skill. American Society for Microbiology 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8561834/ /pubmed/34804321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00172-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kreher et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Kreher, Scott A.
Pavlova, Iglika V.
Nelms, April
An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title_full An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title_fullStr An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title_full_unstemmed An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title_short An Active Learning Intervention Based on Evaluating Alternative Hypotheses Increases Scientific Literacy of Controlled Experiments in Introductory Biology
title_sort active learning intervention based on evaluating alternative hypotheses increases scientific literacy of controlled experiments in introductory biology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00172-21
work_keys_str_mv AT kreherscotta anactivelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology
AT pavlovaiglikav anactivelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology
AT nelmsapril anactivelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology
AT kreherscotta activelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology
AT pavlovaiglikav activelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology
AT nelmsapril activelearninginterventionbasedonevaluatingalternativehypothesesincreasesscientificliteracyofcontrolledexperimentsinintroductorybiology