Cargando…

The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions and physical frailty have overlapping constructs. We aimed to quantify individual contributions of musculoskeletal factors to frailty. METHODS: Participants included 347 men and 360 women aged ≥60 yr (median ages; 70.8 (66.1–78.6) and 71.0 (65.2–77.5), respecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tembo, Monica C., Mohebbi, Mohammadreza, Holloway-Kew, Kara L., Gaston, James, Sui, Sophia X., Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L., Williams, Lana J., Kotowicz, Mark A., Pasco, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04795-4
_version_ 1784593163690704896
author Tembo, Monica C.
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Gaston, James
Sui, Sophia X.
Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L.
Williams, Lana J.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
author_facet Tembo, Monica C.
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Gaston, James
Sui, Sophia X.
Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L.
Williams, Lana J.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
author_sort Tembo, Monica C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions and physical frailty have overlapping constructs. We aimed to quantify individual contributions of musculoskeletal factors to frailty. METHODS: Participants included 347 men and 360 women aged ≥60 yr (median ages; 70.8 (66.1–78.6) and 71.0 (65.2–77.5), respectively) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Frailty was defined as ≥3, pre-frail 1–2, and robust 0, of the following; unintentional weight loss, weakness, low physical activity, exhaustion, and slowness. Measures were made of femoral neck BMD, appendicular lean mass index (ALMI, kg/m(2)) and whole-body fat mass index (FMI, kg/m(2)) by DXA (Lunar), SOS, BUA and SI at the calcaneus (Lunar Achilles Insight) and handgrip strength by dynamometers. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models and AUROC curves were used to quantify the contribution of musculoskeletal parameters to frailty. Potential confounders included anthropometry, smoking, alcohol, prior fracture, FMI, SES and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 54(15.6%) men and 62(17.2%) women were frail. In adjusted-binary logistic models, SI, ALMI and HGS were associated with frailty in men (OR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.53–1.01; OR=0.48, 0.34–0.68; and OR = 0.11, 0.06–0.22; respectively). Muscle measures (ALMI and HGS) contributed more to this association than did bone (SI) (AUROCs 0.77, 0.85 vs 0.71, respectively). In women, only HGS was associated with frailty in adjusted models (OR = 0.30 95%CI 0.20–0.45, AUROC = 0.83). In adjusted ordinal models, similar results were observed in men; for women, HGS and ALMI were associated with frailty (ordered OR = 0.30 95%CI 0.20–0.45; OR = 0.56, 0.40–0.80, respectively). CONCLUSION: Muscle deficits appeared to contribute more than bone deficits to frailty. This may have implications for identifying potential musculoskeletal targets for preventing or managing the progression of frailty. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04795-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85619082021-11-03 The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study Tembo, Monica C. Mohebbi, Mohammadreza Holloway-Kew, Kara L. Gaston, James Sui, Sophia X. Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L. Williams, Lana J. Kotowicz, Mark A. Pasco, Julie A. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions and physical frailty have overlapping constructs. We aimed to quantify individual contributions of musculoskeletal factors to frailty. METHODS: Participants included 347 men and 360 women aged ≥60 yr (median ages; 70.8 (66.1–78.6) and 71.0 (65.2–77.5), respectively) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Frailty was defined as ≥3, pre-frail 1–2, and robust 0, of the following; unintentional weight loss, weakness, low physical activity, exhaustion, and slowness. Measures were made of femoral neck BMD, appendicular lean mass index (ALMI, kg/m(2)) and whole-body fat mass index (FMI, kg/m(2)) by DXA (Lunar), SOS, BUA and SI at the calcaneus (Lunar Achilles Insight) and handgrip strength by dynamometers. Binary and ordinal logistic regression models and AUROC curves were used to quantify the contribution of musculoskeletal parameters to frailty. Potential confounders included anthropometry, smoking, alcohol, prior fracture, FMI, SES and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 54(15.6%) men and 62(17.2%) women were frail. In adjusted-binary logistic models, SI, ALMI and HGS were associated with frailty in men (OR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.53–1.01; OR=0.48, 0.34–0.68; and OR = 0.11, 0.06–0.22; respectively). Muscle measures (ALMI and HGS) contributed more to this association than did bone (SI) (AUROCs 0.77, 0.85 vs 0.71, respectively). In women, only HGS was associated with frailty in adjusted models (OR = 0.30 95%CI 0.20–0.45, AUROC = 0.83). In adjusted ordinal models, similar results were observed in men; for women, HGS and ALMI were associated with frailty (ordered OR = 0.30 95%CI 0.20–0.45; OR = 0.56, 0.40–0.80, respectively). CONCLUSION: Muscle deficits appeared to contribute more than bone deficits to frailty. This may have implications for identifying potential musculoskeletal targets for preventing or managing the progression of frailty. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04795-4. BioMed Central 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8561908/ /pubmed/34724934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04795-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tembo, Monica C.
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Holloway-Kew, Kara L.
Gaston, James
Sui, Sophia X.
Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L.
Williams, Lana J.
Kotowicz, Mark A.
Pasco, Julie A.
The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title_full The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title_short The contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
title_sort contribution of musculoskeletal factors to physical frailty: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04795-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tembomonicac thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT mohebbimohammadreza thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT hollowaykewkaral thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT gastonjames thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT suisophiax thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT brennanolsensharonl thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT williamslanaj thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT kotowiczmarka thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT pascojuliea thecontributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT tembomonicac contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT mohebbimohammadreza contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT hollowaykewkaral contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT gastonjames contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT suisophiax contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT brennanolsensharonl contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT williamslanaj contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT kotowiczmarka contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy
AT pascojuliea contributionofmusculoskeletalfactorstophysicalfrailtyacrosssectionalstudy