Cargando…

The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process

BACKGROUND: Students with a greater number of research experiences are more successful in the National Residency Match Program (NRMP.) As a result, approximately two-thirds of allopathic medical schools have implemented a scholarly research project (SP) as a part of their curriculum. While inclusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daus, Kelly, McEchron, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02989-x
_version_ 1784593170641715200
author Daus, Kelly
McEchron, Matthew
author_facet Daus, Kelly
McEchron, Matthew
author_sort Daus, Kelly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Students with a greater number of research experiences are more successful in the National Residency Match Program (NRMP.) As a result, approximately two-thirds of allopathic medical schools have implemented a scholarly research project (SP) as a part of their curriculum. While inclusion of an SP in the medical school curriculum increases research productivity, literature to date has not investigated the frequency with which it is a discussion topic during residency interviews. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three students from the graduating class of 2019 and 2020 at the University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix (UACOMP) completed a 17-question survey examining the student’s SP and whether they completed additional research, with an overall response rate of 82.6%. Survey participants were asked to quantify how many residency interviewers asked about their SP or additional research during the interview process. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of interviewers asked students about their SP and 41% of interviewers asked students about additional non-SP research. 40% of interviewers asked about research overall to include SP and/or non-SP research. A greater percentage of interviewers (50%) asked students about their SP if they had undertaken additional research compared to interviewers of students who did not undertake additional research (29%, p = 0.0237). A greater percentage of interviewers at academic institutions (31%) asked students about their SP, compared with a smaller percentage of interviewers at predominantly non-academic programs (22%, p = 0.0054). There were no significant differences in the proportion of interviewers asking about the SP based on the type of specialty, competitiveness of specialty, relatedness project topic to specialty, and publication/presentation status of project. CONCLUSION: Student research experiences may serve as a frequent discussion topic during the residency interview. Approximately one-quarter of interviewers ask about the SP regardless of specialty, research topic, and publication/presentation status of the project. Students with additional research experiences beyond their SP may experience a higher percentage of interviewers asking about their SP. Also, students applying to predominantly academic programs may experience a higher proportion of interview questions about research compared to peers interviewing at non-academic programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85619462021-11-03 The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process Daus, Kelly McEchron, Matthew BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Students with a greater number of research experiences are more successful in the National Residency Match Program (NRMP.) As a result, approximately two-thirds of allopathic medical schools have implemented a scholarly research project (SP) as a part of their curriculum. While inclusion of an SP in the medical school curriculum increases research productivity, literature to date has not investigated the frequency with which it is a discussion topic during residency interviews. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three students from the graduating class of 2019 and 2020 at the University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix (UACOMP) completed a 17-question survey examining the student’s SP and whether they completed additional research, with an overall response rate of 82.6%. Survey participants were asked to quantify how many residency interviewers asked about their SP or additional research during the interview process. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of interviewers asked students about their SP and 41% of interviewers asked students about additional non-SP research. 40% of interviewers asked about research overall to include SP and/or non-SP research. A greater percentage of interviewers (50%) asked students about their SP if they had undertaken additional research compared to interviewers of students who did not undertake additional research (29%, p = 0.0237). A greater percentage of interviewers at academic institutions (31%) asked students about their SP, compared with a smaller percentage of interviewers at predominantly non-academic programs (22%, p = 0.0054). There were no significant differences in the proportion of interviewers asking about the SP based on the type of specialty, competitiveness of specialty, relatedness project topic to specialty, and publication/presentation status of project. CONCLUSION: Student research experiences may serve as a frequent discussion topic during the residency interview. Approximately one-quarter of interviewers ask about the SP regardless of specialty, research topic, and publication/presentation status of the project. Students with additional research experiences beyond their SP may experience a higher percentage of interviewers asking about their SP. Also, students applying to predominantly academic programs may experience a higher proportion of interview questions about research compared to peers interviewing at non-academic programs. BioMed Central 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8561946/ /pubmed/34724944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02989-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Daus, Kelly
McEchron, Matthew
The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title_full The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title_fullStr The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title_full_unstemmed The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title_short The impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
title_sort impact of medical student research as a discussion topic during the residency interview process
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02989-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dauskelly theimpactofmedicalstudentresearchasadiscussiontopicduringtheresidencyinterviewprocess
AT mcechronmatthew theimpactofmedicalstudentresearchasadiscussiontopicduringtheresidencyinterviewprocess
AT dauskelly impactofmedicalstudentresearchasadiscussiontopicduringtheresidencyinterviewprocess
AT mcechronmatthew impactofmedicalstudentresearchasadiscussiontopicduringtheresidencyinterviewprocess