Cargando…
The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z |
_version_ | 1784593172159004672 |
---|---|
author | Pais, Ana Sofia Reis, Sandra Laranjo, Mafalda Caramelo, Francisco Silva, Fátima Botelho, Maria Filomena Almeida-Santos, Teresa |
author_facet | Pais, Ana Sofia Reis, Sandra Laranjo, Mafalda Caramelo, Francisco Silva, Fátima Botelho, Maria Filomena Almeida-Santos, Teresa |
author_sort | Pais, Ana Sofia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out with culture of ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional (2D) culture with an alginate matrix three-dimensional (3D) model for ovarian tissue culture. RESULTS: The ovarian tissue culture within the alginate matrix (3D) was similar to 2D culture, regarding follicular density and cell apoptosis in follicles and stroma. The proliferation rate remained stable in both models for follicles, but for stromal cell proliferation it decreased only in 3D culture (p = 0.001). At 24 h of culture, cytotoxicity was lower in the 3D model (p = 0.006). As culture time increased, cytotoxicity seemed similar. Degradation of the tissue was suggested by the histological score analysis of tissue morphology after 72 h of culture. Tissue injury was greater (p = 0.01) in 3D culture due to higher interstitial oedema (p = 0.017) and tissue necrosis (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our results, 3D culture of ovarian tissue has no advantage over 2Dculture; it is more time consuming and difficult to perform and has worse reproducibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8561954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85619542021-11-03 The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture Pais, Ana Sofia Reis, Sandra Laranjo, Mafalda Caramelo, Francisco Silva, Fátima Botelho, Maria Filomena Almeida-Santos, Teresa J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out with culture of ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional (2D) culture with an alginate matrix three-dimensional (3D) model for ovarian tissue culture. RESULTS: The ovarian tissue culture within the alginate matrix (3D) was similar to 2D culture, regarding follicular density and cell apoptosis in follicles and stroma. The proliferation rate remained stable in both models for follicles, but for stromal cell proliferation it decreased only in 3D culture (p = 0.001). At 24 h of culture, cytotoxicity was lower in the 3D model (p = 0.006). As culture time increased, cytotoxicity seemed similar. Degradation of the tissue was suggested by the histological score analysis of tissue morphology after 72 h of culture. Tissue injury was greater (p = 0.01) in 3D culture due to higher interstitial oedema (p = 0.017) and tissue necrosis (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our results, 3D culture of ovarian tissue has no advantage over 2Dculture; it is more time consuming and difficult to perform and has worse reproducibility. BioMed Central 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8561954/ /pubmed/34724957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pais, Ana Sofia Reis, Sandra Laranjo, Mafalda Caramelo, Francisco Silva, Fátima Botelho, Maria Filomena Almeida-Santos, Teresa The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title | The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title_full | The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title_fullStr | The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title_full_unstemmed | The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title_short | The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture |
title_sort | challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2d versus 3d culture |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paisanasofia thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT reissandra thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT laranjomafalda thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT caramelofrancisco thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT silvafatima thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT botelhomariafilomena thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT almeidasantosteresa thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT paisanasofia challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT reissandra challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT laranjomafalda challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT caramelofrancisco challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT silvafatima challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT botelhomariafilomena challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture AT almeidasantosteresa challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture |