Cargando…

The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pais, Ana Sofia, Reis, Sandra, Laranjo, Mafalda, Caramelo, Francisco, Silva, Fátima, Botelho, Maria Filomena, Almeida-Santos, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z
_version_ 1784593172159004672
author Pais, Ana Sofia
Reis, Sandra
Laranjo, Mafalda
Caramelo, Francisco
Silva, Fátima
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Almeida-Santos, Teresa
author_facet Pais, Ana Sofia
Reis, Sandra
Laranjo, Mafalda
Caramelo, Francisco
Silva, Fátima
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Almeida-Santos, Teresa
author_sort Pais, Ana Sofia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out with culture of ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional (2D) culture with an alginate matrix three-dimensional (3D) model for ovarian tissue culture. RESULTS: The ovarian tissue culture within the alginate matrix (3D) was similar to 2D culture, regarding follicular density and cell apoptosis in follicles and stroma. The proliferation rate remained stable in both models for follicles, but for stromal cell proliferation it decreased only in 3D culture (p = 0.001). At 24 h of culture, cytotoxicity was lower in the 3D model (p = 0.006). As culture time increased, cytotoxicity seemed similar. Degradation of the tissue was suggested by the histological score analysis of tissue morphology after 72 h of culture. Tissue injury was greater (p = 0.01) in 3D culture due to higher interstitial oedema (p = 0.017) and tissue necrosis (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our results, 3D culture of ovarian tissue has no advantage over 2Dculture; it is more time consuming and difficult to perform and has worse reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8561954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85619542021-11-03 The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture Pais, Ana Sofia Reis, Sandra Laranjo, Mafalda Caramelo, Francisco Silva, Fátima Botelho, Maria Filomena Almeida-Santos, Teresa J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a powerful technique for preserving female fertility, as it can restore fertility and endocrine function. To increase the longevity of the transplant and decrease the risk of reimplantation of neoplastic cells, several studies have been carried out with culture of ovarian tissue. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional (2D) culture with an alginate matrix three-dimensional (3D) model for ovarian tissue culture. RESULTS: The ovarian tissue culture within the alginate matrix (3D) was similar to 2D culture, regarding follicular density and cell apoptosis in follicles and stroma. The proliferation rate remained stable in both models for follicles, but for stromal cell proliferation it decreased only in 3D culture (p = 0.001). At 24 h of culture, cytotoxicity was lower in the 3D model (p = 0.006). As culture time increased, cytotoxicity seemed similar. Degradation of the tissue was suggested by the histological score analysis of tissue morphology after 72 h of culture. Tissue injury was greater (p = 0.01) in 3D culture due to higher interstitial oedema (p = 0.017) and tissue necrosis (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our results, 3D culture of ovarian tissue has no advantage over 2Dculture; it is more time consuming and difficult to perform and has worse reproducibility. BioMed Central 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8561954/ /pubmed/34724957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pais, Ana Sofia
Reis, Sandra
Laranjo, Mafalda
Caramelo, Francisco
Silva, Fátima
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Almeida-Santos, Teresa
The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title_full The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title_fullStr The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title_short The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
title_sort challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2d versus 3d culture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00892-z
work_keys_str_mv AT paisanasofia thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT reissandra thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT laranjomafalda thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT caramelofrancisco thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT silvafatima thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT botelhomariafilomena thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT almeidasantosteresa thechallengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT paisanasofia challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT reissandra challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT laranjomafalda challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT caramelofrancisco challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT silvafatima challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT botelhomariafilomena challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture
AT almeidasantosteresa challengeofovariantissueculture2dversus3dculture